Media Coursework
global warming is a critical issue of our generation. There is a constant reminder of this issue across all forms of media whether that is on the television, newspapers or even on the radio. The main reason upon which this matter is so serious is the apparent apocalyptic side effects of global warming e.g. floods, freak storms, temperature increase etc. Although many people believe that these effects of global will cause many problems to our day to day lives, a small minority believe that global warming benefits outweigh the negatives. Some even believe that global warming is merely a myth and fairly does not exist. Because of these contrasting beliefs, there is a constant struggle, on either side, to prove the opposing person’s hypothesis incorrect. However this does not stop at mere rivalry, but across all forms of media, especially newspaper articles, there is almost as if to say there a recruiting process upon which both sides tries to persuade the reader into believing their personal viewpoints. This consequently makes the reader the pass on the message to friends and family thus expanding their “numbers of members.” Two prime examples of this kind of this rivalry are the two similar articles “Meltdown in the Arctic puts the heat on us all” written by John Arlidge and “Welcome to the Garden of Eden” written by Dennis Avery.
Both of these articles are taken from a broadsheet newspaper. This can be easily speculated because of the use of sophisticated and polysyllabic language, lack of imagery and lengthy and dense paragraphs. Another way to comprehend that it is actually a broadsheet article was to see where it had been extracted from. “The Observer” and “The Guardian” are renowned for their publication of broadsheet articles so consequently it is clear that the extracts are actually broadsheets. Nevertheless these articles link with my initial point of competition because they both use a range of various persuasive techniques to win over the reader, though that will be discussed in greater detail through the following paragraphs. The main point, however, is that which article actually persuades the reader the most.
The Term Paper on Sociological Perspective On Global Warming And Health Problems Associated With It
Sociological Perspective on Global Warming and Health Problems, Associated With It (1) The effects of Global have been discussed from different perspectives; however, only in recent years, it became obvious to many scientists that rising of Earths atmosphere affects the lives of people in very immediate manner. Therefore, those who suggest that humanity have another hundred years, before Global ...
Immediately, from the headline alone, we can confirm which view of global warming each article has. This can easily be seen, by not just the use but also the effects upon which each persuasive techniques cause. Let’s start off with the article “Meltdown in the Arctic puts the heat on us all.” This headline contains many persuasive techniques to emphasis the negativity of climate change. One of these techniques is the use of the word ‘Meltdown.’ The word meltdown was used precisely to add a chaotic atmosphere as the word meltdown brings upon negative connotations. This is due to the fact that meltdowns usually are associated with nuclear related disasters which, then, affect the surrounding s and living organisms. It is trying to imply that this will also happen to if global warming continues to increase thus backing up the point that global warming is bad and makes the reader want to stop global warming. This then links in with the following phrase ‘puts the heat on us all.’ This is an excellent way to persuade the reader as it puts the reader directly under the spotlight. ‘ Puts the heat’ is an appropriate idiom to use in this context as it basically means putting someone under pressure and that someone is later explained to be “us,” the reader.
It makes you think that you are causing the and consequently guilt trips you into atoning for your sins by stopping global warming. This headline, however, is the complete opposite of the second article “Welcome to the Garden of Eden” were the whole meaning is that there is no sin. This is due to the biblical reference of the Garden of Eden where, as you may know, Adam and Eve dwelled before their life on Earth. It has positives connotations because of its perfectness and purity. This then tied with the word ‘welcome’ almost makes it sound as if it was an invitation. You have been invited to a place of no sin therefore you have not committed sin. This is a great technique as it makes the reader comfortable and happy rather than accusing them of what they have or haven’t done straight away. It reassures the reader that nothing is going to happen because they haven’t done anything.
The Term Paper on Global Warming 41
The ability to understand and address effects of global warming forms the basis to sustainability of resources, greater social-economic development, political stability and ecological sanctity in the fast globalizing society. Global warming, unlike it was previously thought, is not a one state issue, but a highly diverse aspect with far reaching implications to all environmental spheres. To concur ...
Another way Dennis Avery and John Arlidge persuade their audience is by using list to create various effects. In the garden they are used this to convince the reader of the benefits of globalwarming. An example of a list that uses this effect is “farming moved further north in Scandinavia, Russia, Manchuria, northern Japan and north America.” It is almost as if it had been taken out of a brochure due to the way it is presented. It is implying that with global warming you will receive many benefits and that is why you should join us. It is almost as if they are selling global warming to you. And many people do get reeled in by this. With the sufficient data a list is an amazing way to persuade a person especially in cases involving discouraging outcomes as people would rather see a list of positives rather than negatives. However, that is not always the case. In the Meltdown the writer uses lists in a negative way however they twist it into their advantage. The way they accomplish this is by using the lists to add a sad and sympathetic atmosphere. For instance “ice, snow and permafrost are home to polar bears, walruses, several species of seals, caribou, collared lemmings, Arctic foxes, wolves and muskoxen.” By putting these animals in a list it allows the reader to imagine the animals within their head.
This allows the reader to create a small bond with their animals. However, immediately that bond is taken away as that thought of their home melting comes into place. At this point the reader is feeling guilt and sympathy towards the animals as he thinks that he causing the loss of their habitat and in a way he is. Subsequently the reader has stronger views toward global warming and is persuaded to make a change. This is a perfect way to persuade someone as it allows them to feel a sense of accomplishment and pride when they helpsomeone. People are encouraged at the idea of saving someone’s life. It allows them to feel the hero. The lists in meltdown fully utilise this.
The Review on Tea Cake Janie Reader People
AP Book Report 1. Title: Their Eyes Were Watching God 2. Author and Date Written: Zora Neale Hurston; 1937 3. Country of Author: America 4. Major Characters: Janie, the protagonist of the novel, is described as powerful, articulate, self-reliant, and radically different. She is a very strong woman, both mentally and physically. She also is a very beautiful woman, adored by many. The novel follows ...
The opening for Meltdown is peculiar for an article. It is almost as if it is written in story format though there is a good reason for it. At the start of the article it sets the scene, in the arctic sea. Then, suddenly a mysterious figure approaches the boat. The author then involves the reader by saying ‘is it a seal? A whale? An Eskimo fishing boat?’ to amplify the following effect. After the suspense subsides the figure turns out to be a polar bear. Though the story of the polar bear is disheartening the persuasive technique within the story is the emotive language that they use to describe the polar bear. Words and phrases like ‘emaciated’ ‘pathetic’ and ‘so weak it can hardly swim’ add a really saddening atmosphere especially since this was an anecdote, meaning that these kinds of events really happen. People feel sorry for the polar bear as they can just imagine the poor lonely bear in their head. This is then reinforced by the image on the other side. Because this mental image leaves negative connotations in their head they start to believe in the destructive side of global warming. The use of emotive language adds this extra impact to this. For instance instead of just using plain old hungry they used emaciated. As you can see the two words add completely different sets of imagery. If you are hungry it means you just haven’t eaten however if you are emaciated then you are starving, thin and weary. And it is because of this emotive language that more people are persuaded.
The other way that Meltdown’s adds a sense of sympathy is by using the views of the Inuit to show the change in climate. “We used to have a good life. We caught walrus and seals very much. But now we cannot find animals so easily. We go hunting for days but do not find anything. The fishermen do not take food on their boats like the white man and after days come home real skinny.” This shows that even a local inhabitant who doesn’t really understand the laws of science can notice a significant change in the environment. By using someone from the specific place to adds credibility to the point of the negative effects of global warming. This consequently shows that not only are the effects of global warming are affecting animals but also humans. By our fuel consumptions we are causing the suffering of fellow humans. This idea of man slaughter gives the reader a sense of guilt and the makes the reader want to change their ways.
The Essay on People Should Not Persuade Others to Join Their Religion
I agree with the statement ‘People should not persuade others to join their religion’ because it’s the persons choice. Everyone has the right to choose what religion they want, or don’t want, based on their own reasons and feelings and no one should try and influence them into choosing one religion that they may not actually believe in but have been persuaded by others that it is the best religion ...
One more way that each article persuades the reader is by the use of statistics. However the main difference between each article is the use of scientist that quotes the statistic. In meltdown they use many quotes from professionals and experts. An example of this is when they use a quote from ‘Lori Quakenbush, an Arctic researcher at Alaska University.’ By using Lori it adds credibility to her view as she is an arctic researcher, so she is dealing in her specialised subject and since she has gone to university, meaning she has had higher education within that subject. Due to this more people believe the quote as they think that the specialists are more likely to be correct and therefore more people are persuaded by the quotes. On the contrary the use of scientists does not occur in the Garden of Eden article however it should. This is because since the article is claiming that global warming doesn’t exist they need as much evidence as possible to prove this controversial statement. By not supplying valid scientists they would instantly lose many readers. That is why they use a different technique to compensate for this .That technique is the use of historical facts. Many people are persuaded of the story of the ‘Little Optimum’ and of all its benefits. This is because it reassures reader that great benefits of climate change do exist as they have happened in the past. That is why when this technique is linked with lists they make a powerful persuasive combination. It allows the reader to think that since good things happened before good things are going to happen now. It reminds of the saying ‘history always repeats itself.’
The Essay on Bobby Knight Article Reader One
Comparison between two persuasive arguments Should legendary coach Bobby Knight been fired from the University of Indiana? Does the punishment fit the crime? The two articles "The Knight Who Thought He Was King," and "Knight Fall" try to answer these two controversial questions. Each of these articles present the debated issue in their own distinct ways. "Knight Fall" is written in a way that the ...
The final way to persuade their readers about their points of views is by using the wrap up. Since it’sthe last thing you read, it’s most likely to be remembered the most. That is why it is important to add a last form of persuasion into this. The Meltdowns is “for the last great wilderness and the rest of humanity, the heat is on.” Upon reading the short paragraph the full impact of the article is transmitted. It refers back to the headline about applying pressure while using the clever pun of heat. By using this pun it also helps the reader to remember this statement. By mentioning the word ‘last’ also adds a sense of urgency especially when followed by words like ‘wilderness’ and ‘humanity.’ The whole views of the article are reflected in this statement as it saying we are driving ourselves into extinction. However it is the complete opposite in Garden as it says “we have nothing to fear but fearmongers themselves.” By adapting the famous phrase from Franklin D. Roosevelt it is trying to say that there is nothing to worry and scientist just like to cause trouble. Though this does reassure readers many people will also be worried about this controversial statement since there is insufficient evidence to prove that this statement is true. But he reassure the reader by mention the ‘Little Climate Optimum’ again and relating to the past.
Overall, I think that meltdown in the arctic is more persuasive as it uses each technique more effectively than the Garden of Eden. For instance, the headline is the start of the whole article so right from then you have to reel the audience into the article. The Garden of Eden was not assertive enough and did not explain what the whole article was about whereas in meltdown you know immediately what it is about. Though the garden uses historical references that does not account for the mockery of scientist whilst writing a controversial article. You cannot do that in that sitituation as people won’t believe what you say due to the lack of credibility. Also, Meltdown uses animals and humans successfully to create a heartbreaking atmosphere. This is then used to persuade many people as people feel sad and guilty towards the two. And finally, all the facts that they state are backed up by valid scientist to consequently add more credibility. So overall Meltdown is more persuasive.
The Essay on Intended Effect Article Writer Reader
ARTICLE 1. 1. State the type of text- letter to the editor, editorial etc. - In her letter to the editor titled, "Don't dump waste", L. Bourke argues, claims, asserts, advocates, contends... Writer's main contention- state the writers main contention and mention a couple of the main reasons given to support his contention. - the author supports this view by highlighting - claims that - asserts ...
