Question 1: In today’s society people are used to receiving things how they want it and when they want it. Since this started becoming the case the world had to start changing as did the news. Today’s news is not like the one 90`s. it appears that the news station are starting to get the picture as well. Personally I remember turning on the news and they only talking about death war or something in that category. It was sad to turn the news on and at one point I remember my family wouldn’t watch it. After jeopardy we would simply turn the TV off. The American race is to upbeat for daily news stations, by that I mean the channel 11`s and 13`s will soon become obsolete. The American wants the news here and now with some sadness to it.
If you look at the two different types of news you wanted us to look at you will see exactly what I mean on one hand we have news shows like The Daily Show and The Colbert Report. This type of news grabs hold to my generation. I know when I first watched the Colbert report I didn’t at first think I was watching news he has a way to bring people into the news in such a way that you will forget quickly that you are even watching the news. Today’s society has become an age of internet, internet sites and in all a viral generation the news we once knew of came on once or twice a day. In today’s day and age people want to be able to check their news at any time. The Colbert Report makes this possible you can pull up whatever episode at any time via internet. the pros to the up tempo news is such that it will keep the audience attentive and hooked the sarcasm that is placed in simply helps us relate to what they are saying. Colbert is simply using everyday language, unlike Rachel Maddow she uses your typical high society that not the average foe and listen to and grasp the concepts in which they are talking about. In the future I believe that all news will become more “viral” and they will start to speak more in a sarcastic every day tone.
The Essay on Extensive Internet Information People Online
The Extensive Internet The Internet is a growing phenomenon that was introduced into our homes in the early 1990 s. Over 50 million people used the Internet in 1995 and by the year 2001 the number is predicted to be over 150 million. The net has helped the free flow of ideas, created a place for people to interact with each other, allowed one to express viewpoints with a large audience, and ...
Question #4: With the way media and culture is today you must have a critical perspective in order to fully understand what is going on. Having an open mind allows for a more in depth thought on what you are watching or listening to. As a human race we tend to use more metaphors then anything. In order to fully understand these metaphors we must critically dissect what we are doing. I think that persons with a cynical perspective, they look for the most obvious answer which isn’t all ways the right answer. For instance if President Bush back in 2001, had thought cynical he would have simply wiped Iran and Iraq off the face of the earth. He didn’t though he thought critically and now both of the two main members of arcadia are dead and deposed of. That might be a little on the extreme side but it gets the point across.
With today’s media you have to go through the steps that Campbell outlines. When I learned about this concept back in 11th grade I was taught it by the name of critical dissecting. Which is what it is when you ingest today’s media you cannot just take it in? You must analysis it, interpret it, evaluate it and engage in it head first. When you just look at the media in a cynical few you skip all these steps and simply stop, and go straight the evaluation or judging stage. This makes for a non-thorough understanding of the document or show in which you are watching. The cynical view is like selective reading you interpret it how you want because you have yet to fully evaluate the substance you are inserting into your brain. In order to fully adhere and understand today’s media and culture you must look at it with open eyes and with a critical perspective
Question #5: Does the mass media have a significant amount of power of its audience? I could see why some would see this as so in the media today has become more open to post things however they want and as long as you can have a little creditability people will take what they say and suck it up with ease. This gives anyone with a little bit of money and power to post anything or say anything. If you go onto the internet you can find ANYTHING you want in a matter of seconds. The media today tends to only voice the options of the few. By that I mean the amount of people out there who are on television that are expression there ideas is only the few, we the majority that have no to little voice go unheard. If we the people opened our mouth and spoke out we would change the world around. This leads me to the next question.
The Essay on The media has far too much power over people’s opinion
We live in a time and age that people are daily bombarded with news of any kind not only on TV, on the radio or in the press but also on the Internet. Numerous news bulletins on the same subject is a common phenomenon whose receivers do not have time to develop an opinion of their own and they just repeat what they have heard,seen or read without processing it. People, nowadays, have been leading ...
Does the audience ultimately have more power than the media? In theory the audience is the media. We the people choose what we want to watch; when we want to watch it and which of our many devices do we want to watch it on. To go as far as to say we have power over the media I do not believe this can be rightfully stated. As stated before the media is run by the “few” I mean yes we do control the ratings but the heads behind the shows really have power of the media. Americans are so caught up to the newest best thing they tend to forget that they have the power to change what is protracted by the media. So to answer the question I believe the media is controlled by the “few”.
Question #6: I think that I am persuaded most by the positive and the negative type of ad complains equally. The positive ads help show what kind of person and am about to cote for. It lets me open up my heart in order that I might put the candidate inside. In most cases these positive campaign ads have some type of slow calm yet authoritative music playing in the background. This gives off the allusion that the candidate appeals to the average day man. This is what pulls me in and pulls most people in. I remember when Obama`s presidential campaigns first started coming on the message that I was getting out of was that he will be the first black president and isn’t it time for a change. I if I could have voted this would have been a deciding factor although it might be wrong. For once can we change history in a HUGE was. The ads that Obamas people placed out where that of a positive note the appealed to the everyday man in a way that was simple to understand and even easier to love.
The Term Paper on Media and Politics 3
We all agree that a well-informed public leads to a more open, just and civic-minded society. Yet today it seems every major and minor news network has a Sunday talk show or weekly roundtable dedicated to “educating” the American public about politics. In addition, with the growth of the Internet, thousands of Web sites exist with information on politics and government. The irony is ...
On the other hand you have the negative type of campaign ads this type tends to slander the other opposing candidates. These types of ads are my favorite and you mostly have to go on YouTube to find them, for they tend to not be shared as much as the positive ads. The reason why I like these types of ads appeal to me so much is because; they tend to show the side of the candidates that we tend to not see. When Obama first came out they stressed the fact that he smoked in these negative campaigns. These ads help slander Obama although they did not work they derived its purpose they made it to show that Obama isn’t as perfect the American race have perceived him to be. In theory there is no right or wrong type of ad it all depends on how you interpret it and which one appeals to you the most.
