Doll s House Going through your young adult years you go from being young and foolish to mature and wise. You also learn a lot about your inner strength and power. When first reading the Dolls House by Henrik Ibe son, it was clearly evident that Nora and Torvalds relationship was unhealthy and unbalanced. Nora never made the dwelling on her feelings and weaknesses passover and exhibits no strength. As well as Torvald in the end of the story, however things differ and Nora made some quick decisions. I believe she made the right decisions.
I also believe she ll continue to exhibit her new found strength. Nora did herself a favor by leaving Torvald. Her thoughts were deep on how she needed to find herself and establish a personality. The fact that had to deal with degrading comments from her loved ones all her life shows a need for change. And her leaping strength was proof that she could provide herself with what she needed.
It also concluded that she was capable to stand alone. In comparing Nora to a doll in a house you can also see her as a puppet. It was clear she had no ideas or thoughts of her own. Starting from birth when living with her farther through to her marriage with Torvald, Nora has been a puppeteer and it is clearly evident it has all been unhealthy psychologically. Her behavior towards her family and their behavior towards her also shows more weakness and immaturity which is probably more specifically why Nora abandoned the burden of living there. Her relationship with her children was horrendous, a terrible example of motherly love.
The Essay on A Dolls House By Henrik Ibsen
A Dolls House by Henrik Ibsen History has proven that the holy sanctity of marriage has faltered. Women no longer feel obligated to remain in a union that does not suite her needs or hold her best interest. In the late nineteenth century, it was considered scandalous for a woman to walk out on her family obligations. Henrik Ibsen's "A Doll's House," written in 1879, is a direct attack on the ...
The way Nora played hide-n-seek with them as if she were one of them was disturbing. Also how she threw their snow clothes about the floor after they returned from playing outside, displayed Nora s lack of responsibility. I agree with her saying she was incompetent as a mother. Then there is her demented relationship with her husband. Torvalds treatment to Nora was especially rude. His use of the degrading words, little Capri girl, darling songbird and child was inexcusable.
He also put a limit on how many sweets she could eat and when he was angry he sent her to her room. Her role in the household rather than a Mother was a foolish child. As the story progressed and the conflict of Krogstad s letter arose my feelings were anything but swayed. The way Nora went about hiding it was not something I would expect from a mother of three and loving faithful wife and showed even more irresponsibility and immaturity.
When everything came out in the open I was shocked at Torvald and his exhibiting such shallowness Being a very opinionated person the story got to me. I judged characters harshly because there are under lying concepts. So when Nora broke out and decided to stand up for herself and leave I was thinking to myself that was the only way to go. Her unhealthy relationships with her husband, her children and her late father along with the Krogstad letter conflict and Torvalds reaction finally combining with Nora s inner feelings led me to believe that Nora made the right decision regarding her life. One could say that leaving her children is a terrible wrongdoing, however her reasons for leaving outnumbered her reasons for staying. After all isn t the key to life that have you to be happy with yourself first before being able to be happy with another?.
