That is a question which many generations of Canadians have asked themselves. Many ideas for reform have arisen form this dialogue, but why havent Canadiatopic I came across many rather insightful and humorous quotations that I am going to share with you. 1. Senator Eugene For sey commenting on the 1987 me ech Lake proposal: The transformed Senate will have all the legal powers of the present Senate. Most notably the power to reject, absolutely, any bill whatsoever.
But it will have a political clout the present Senate cannot even dream of. Its members will take seriously their job of representing provincial and regional interests, and if that makes trouble A Reformed Canadian Senate That is a question which many generations of Canadians have asked themselves. Many ideas for reform have arisen form this dialogue, but why havent Canadians accepted any of those proposals First, Canada as we know is governed federally by a parliament that consists of the the Monarch, the Senate, and the House of Commons. These three bodies tend to work harmoniously with one another to allow the government of the day to carry out its business efficiently. This synchronism of the federal parliament has also been criticised for in effect giving the governing party a five-year dictatorship.
One of the largest contributors to this apparent lack of accountability of the federal government is the ineffective senate. The senate was established as the chamber of sober second thought but it contemporary practice it has to a great degree become the chamber of the second rubber stamp on a bills way to the governor general. The reasons for the senates lack of effectiveness are apparent to us all: 1. Senators lack credibility as they are appointed 2. As senators ar appointed by the PM they are effectively puppets of the federal government 3.
The Essay on Comparison of Canadian Government and Chinese Government
Government: Canada and ChinaThe two countries I have chosen to compare are China and Canada. Their systems of government are very different and have different powers and rolls in their country. Canada has a system of government very similar to our own. While china's government appears to be similar as well, but it is quite different. Canada's government democratic and is parliamentary in form but, ...
The unequal provincial representation makes it nearly impossible for senators to adequately defend their provinces interests. As well recent scandals involving the attendance of senators have all contributed to the publics unfavourable view of the senate. Many proposals for senate reform have been made over the years a few of them being: 1. The House of the federation, where in the constitution there should be a role for provinces in selecting members of the senate, as well as a greater representation of the western and Atlantic provinces in the upper house. 2.
One proposal from 1908 suggests that 1/3 of senators be appointed by the federal government, 1/3 by the provincial government, and the remaining 1/3 by universities and public bodies. 3. Recent proposals have included the German Bundesrat model whereby the provinces would send delegations to represent them in the federal senate. 4. In 1984 it was recommended by a special Joint Committee on Senate reform that the senate be elected directly by the people. 5.
The previous proposal is the basis for the current triple E senate, elected, equal, and effective, which the Reform party of Canada is currently proposing. 6. There is also a movement for the abolition of the senate with political backing form the New Democratic Party of Canada. Variations on these proposals have been made over the years but none have them have been widely accepted by the Canadian people, why 1. One of the reasons that the many house of federation, or mixed appointment and elected models have failed is a result of the publics negative perception of the appointment process. By giving the provinces power to name senators it would give the premiers the ability to perpetuate the patronage process and thus reduce the credibility of the reformed senate.
The Term Paper on Senate Reform Senators Canada Party
... However, in order to ensure that Senate reform takes place, both the provinces and the current Senators must make sacrifices for the ... is for Senate reform, since a reformed Senate plays an important role in a democratic government. Looking at the U. S. Senate, as well ... a majority vote for Senate reform, then Quebec is a member of the minority. This proposal for Senate reform is a suggestion to ...
It would take the criticism of the senate away from the federal government and place it in the provincial arena. There is a benefit to this proposal that could lead to further senate reforms over time. If it were the responsibility of the provinces to appoint senators it is reasonable to assume that in certain provinces there would be a push towards electing senators provincially. This idea is not too far off, as in Alberta we have seen this occur even without the provincial authority to appoint senators, thus it is reasonable to predict that if the provinces had the authority to appoint senators that the process of senatorial selection would become more popular elsewhere. 2. The largest stumbling block to a triple E senate has been Quebec and Ontario’s apprehension to reducing their influence within the federal government.
Under the triple E proposal their representation would be significantly diluted. 3. There are also the questions of how effective we would want the senate to be Should it continue to have the same legislative powers as it currently does If not what powers should it exercise If it retained the same powers many have argued that that we would be creating a second house of commons that would only slow down the process of government as well as increase the cost of government conducting its business. Proponents of the triple e senate argue that that is the reason we need a reformed senate, to disable the government from trampling over provincial rights and to limit the Governments ability to rush through legislation that deserves sober second thought.
4. There is also no incentive for the federal government to agree to senate reform as it would significantly lessen their importance in parliament. The only acceptable proposals that would appear to satisfy the federal governments desire to maintain control would be keeping the status quo, or the complete abolition of the senate. As you can see it is apparent that there are many reasons for why senate reform proposals have not been broadly accepted by the Canadian populace. Regrettably it is often not the proposed reform that is rejected it is the additional constitutional reforms that have been in the past packaged along with senate reforms. It seems even some members of the upper chamber dont see it as being an effective tool in parliament.
The Term Paper on Should U.S. government reform its surveillance policy?
I was not interested in the privacy issue until former NSA contractor Edward Snowden publicly disclosed a large number of classified documents which are about U. S. government implemented massive surveillance program toward American citizens and foreign countries. This incident was viewed as the most significant leak in America history and of course it has caused sensation worldwide. However, ...
The senate has been severely criticised for its action… I f we enact legislation speedily, we are called rubber stamps. If we exercise the constitutional authority which the Senate posses under the British North America Act, we are told that we are doing something that we have no right to do. I dont know how to satisfy our critics 3… the importance of this question in the minds of the statesmen at Quebec may be gleaned from the fact that practically the whole six days out of a total of fourteen spent in discussing the details of the {union} scheme were given over to the problems of constituting the second chamber.
If the upper chamber was that important to the founding Fathers perhaps we should follow their example and not rush when it comes to reforming the upper house. I would encourage any of you have any concerns about the senate or would like any further information to contact the senate too free at 1800 267 7362. There you can contact any senator too free and from my experience they are more than happy to assist you. kes it nearly impossible for se.
