A Tale of Two Cities In the novel A Tale of Two Cities there were three strands of people: theManettes, the Everemonds and the revolutionists. These three strands became critically entangled at one point in the book. Everyone of the strands became involved when Charles Darnay was found guilty at his trial and sentenced to death. Charles was currently involved with the Manette family when the revolutionists imprisoned him for being an Evremonde. Of course there were many events leading up to Darnay’s conviction. The first event occurred when Dr.
Manette was locked up in the Bastille by the Evremonde family. He was called upon to care for Madame Defarge’s sister and brother, but when they died he was imprisoned so he could not tell anyone of their murder. Madame Defarge became very angry with the loss of her family and planned revenge against all the Evremondes. Dr. Manette stayed in the Bastille for eighteen years.
During his time in there he wrote a diary of what went on. He also lost his identity and became a shoe cobbler. When he finally got out of prison he had no recollection of his early life. The second event was when Charles Darnay asked to marry Lucie Manette.
Dr. Manette, who had be reunited with his daughter, saw no problem with the marriage until Charles revealed his real identity to everyone on the wedding day. Charles’s last name was really Evremonde. His father was the man who put Dr.
Manette in the Bastille for all those years. Manette forgave Charles because he was not like his evil father or his uncle, the Marquis St. Evremonde. Charles and Lucie got married as they planned to. The last event occurred when Madame Defarge planned revenge against all the Evremondes. She was a revolutionist and knitted a list of names for her people to murder.
The Essay on Portrayal of Charles Bovary in Madame Bovary
He had on a short green jacket with black buttons, which must have pinched him under the arms although he was not broad-shouldered, and which revealed at the cuffs a glimpse of red wrists that were used to going bare. ” From the very beginning, Charles is marginalized by Flaubert as a rural figure. This report shows the scene that unfolds itself at the introduction of Charles through the eyes of ...
Charles Darnay was added when she found out his real identity as anEvremonde. Also the names of his wife, Lucie Manette, and his newly born daughter, Little Lucie, were added to her murder list. Charles and his family were now in the middle of the three strands differences. Charles Dickens showed the relationship between the Evremondes, theManettes and the revolutionists all through the one character, Charles Darnay. Hew as closely related to all these groups in many ways.
Each part of the story was connected and related to each other so without the three events leading up toDarnay’s trial, the outcome of the story would of been different. It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way — in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only. -Charles Dickens This was the opening paragraph to A Tale of Two Cities. It had a great deal of contrast within it.
Every sentence that Dickens wrote, he went back and contradicted himself on it. It became a very well known paragraph with many readers. Charles also contrasted his characters, settings, ideas and the moods in the novel. Dickens said it was the best of times and it was the worst of times. So which one was it? It was both, clearly depending on which group you were in at that time.
It was the best of times for the revolutionists. They got to rebel against the aristocrats like they planned to do while getting revenge on the people they disliked. It was the worst of times for the Evremondes. They got murdered for things that they did in the past years. The Manette were having good times and bad times both. They just got mixed up in the middle of all the confusion.
The Essay on Compare and Contrast of Short Stories
In “The Ones That Walk Away From Omelas” and “The Lottery”, Ursula Le Guin and Shirley Jackson portray a supposedly perfect society built on clandestine secrets. In the short story “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas”, Omelas’ inhabitants are smart and cultured, and it seems like a utopian city of happiness and delight. Everything about Omelas is your every desire, disregarding the secret of the ...
Charles Dickens also contrasted his characters. Two men, Sydney Carton and Charles Darnay, resembled each other a whole lot. However, their personalities and attitudes contrasted very much. Sydney was a sensitive and caring man, where Charles was a self-centered and passive man. How could these two men that looked so much a like be so different? Also, Lucie Manette and Miss Pross contrasted in the novel. These two women spent so much time together.
Miss Pross raised Lucie from childhood but yet she grew up with a completely different personality. Without all the contrast in A Tale of Two Cities the story would of been very dull. Charles did a good job writing the story to contrast the two countries of England and France, but at the same time he showed how they went through some of the same problems.
