An absolute monarch is a ruler by divine right who has control over every portion of his kingdom. The most famous absolute monarch, Louis XIV, had the longest reign of any of the French kings. Louis achieved this as a result of his reformed laws, foreign policy, a smart economic advisor, and his decision to deny power to the nobility. Although some of these ideas could be viewed as having a negative impacting on France, overall Louis XIV’s absolute government was beneficial to the development of his country.
By restructuring France’s laws into one standard legal code Louis gained public support, by showing that he was a fair leader. “The Code”, as Louis labeled it, was applicable to everyone (except Louis, of course), and universalized laws across France. The power to enforce “The Code” was taken away from lords and nobles, and instead given to “Intendants”, upper-middle class men appointed by Louis. These intendants, having recently “fallen” into their positions of power, were not used to their positions, and because of this felt indebted and completely loyal to Louis. The lack of criticism and discussion allowed decrees to be passed more quickly. The end consequence of these actions was that the government operated more efficiently.
Louis also gained support from people by reforming France’s foreign policy. By adopting an aggressive foreign strategy (to expand France’s borders to “the natural boundaries of ancient Gaul”), Louis was able to unite the people within France against common enemies. Although these expansionist actions led to wars with Holland, Germany, Italy and Spain, it gained France better strategic boundaries. These new borders allowed the French civilians to feel more secure in their homes, and generated more tax revenue from the newly acquired citizens. These factors, in combination with harvesting new natural resources from newly acquired land, provided a greater benefit for France than the alternative, that is to sit at home waiting to be attacked. Another way Louis gained support from his people which positively benefited France was by improving the financial status of France.
The Term Paper on Nuclear Power 4
Since the beginning of civilization, man has always persuaded development with a lot of vigor and determination. In his pursuit he created of the most sophisticated technologies for quenching his thirst for science and invention. Out of all the technologies that have been invented, one technology stands apart from all, due to its excessively diverse nature in terms of advantage and disadvantages. ...
Louis hired Jean-Baptiste Colbert, a Swiss banker, to reform France’s financial situation. By seeking out people who avoided their taxes (for example, people posing as nobles) and reorganizing the tax collection system (Before Colbert the majority of collected tax never even made it to the treasury), Colbert was able to reduce the loses of the treasury by 30, 000, 000 liras. This, in conjunction with stimulating the economy by reducing taxes, allowing monopolies, and encouraging immigration of skilled workers, boosted the worth of the French economy, and had a positive influence on the country as a whole. During the reign of Louis XIV, France’s stability and success was threatened by the power of the nobility. When Louis looked back at the Fronde, a nobility revolt that occurred during his childhood, he realized the thirst for power the nobility held, and as a result limited their power. To begin with, Louis forced the nobles to move to Versailles where they could cause less trouble, and Louis could keep a close eye on them.
Louis achieved this by threatening to deny them their pensions if they didn’t move. Louis also instituted heavy taxing for the nobles, in the form of a 10% income tax as well as a head tax. These measures prevented a Noble uprising during Louis’ reign as king, and allowed France to develop positively as a country. It can be argued that Louis XIV’s absolutist government was counter-productive for the development of France. The very nature of an absolutist government, where all power is held by one person, can result in poor decisions which are based purely on personal vendetta’s or uneducated opinions.
The Essay on Ruler People Power Generous
Question: Machiavelli lists several virtues that all rulers should have. Describe in your own words what those virtues are. Do you agree with Machiavelli? Why? (Note that it is possible that you may agree with some of his virtues but not others. ) Through his many years of experience with Italian politics Machiavelli wrote "The Prince"; a how-to guide for new rulers. We are given descriptions of ...
Louie’s expansionist policies, for example, were not always a wise course of action and created many enemies, including Holland, England and Germany. These wars, as well as investment in Versailles, ultimately emptied the French treasury. Louis also revoked the edict of Nantes, because he felt that Protestants were more likely to rebel because they didn’t share his religion. This resulted in many educated and talented people leaving France. These events show that there are some negative trade-offs to having an absolutist government. Louis’s “uneducated” actions did have positive effects.
Louis expansionist foreign policy, although it created enemies, allowed France to maintain safer borders, and achieve greater economic success through tax collection and harvesting natural resources. The grand palace of Versailles, although it did bankrupt the country, gave France a public image of civilized glory that is still represented by Versailles today. By revoking the Edict of Nantes, which encouraged Protestants to leave, Louis prevented catholic-protestant feuds from occurring within France. Although many of Louis’s actions appeared to be detrimental to France’s development, they did in fact encourage France’s growth as a nation. Louis took the power of the Absolutist government and used it to the benefit of the country of France, the people of France, and the King of France.
As a result of Louis XIV’s actions France grew during his reign from a group of French speaking people to a nation of proud, powerful Europeans.
