Jefferson and Hamilton were both fundamental in the creation of the Constitution and the present government. They both agreed that the government needed some changes, but that is where the similarities ended. Hamilton was the creator of the Federalist Party which represented favor in strong central government, a Federal Bank, and a stable financial system. Jefferson was the creator of the Anti-Federalist Party who did not favor strong central government, and believed in an agrarian economy. Both leaders had influence on the new government and economy of America, but had different view on how it should be run.
Both leaders/groups contributed in the ratification of the Constitution, but interpreted the foundations and articles differently. For example, Jefferson believed that the proposed central government was unconstitutional because it was not written in the Constitution. In Doc. A, Jefferson stated “that all powers not delegated to the U.S. by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it by the states, remain with the people.” Hamilton and the Federalists believed in loose interpretation of the Constitution, so that the central government could become more powerful. An example of this is the foundation of the Bank of the United States in 1789. Hamilton stated in Doc. B, that the Constitution can be decisive when needed. “That the Constitution and the laws of the U.S. made in pursuance of it, and all treaties made… under their authority should be the supreme law of the land.”
The Essay on Federal Government Constitution Commonwealth State
Explain and evaluate both the limits placed on Commonwealth power under the Constitution and the extension of that power through international law and elements of the Constitution. In the year 2001, The Australian nation will celebrate the reaching of a significant milestone one hundred years of government under our present constitution. As the anniversary approaches, it is important for all ...
On the topic of individual liberty and uniting the people; Hamilton and the Federalists, and Jefferson and the Anti-Federalists had different views of this. The disagreement between the two parties would bring about a great outcome that is still in use today, the Bill of Rights. The Federalist’s were afraid above all, of disorder, anarchy, and chaos. This reason supported why they did not think that a Bill of Rights was needed. It would bring freedom and liberty to act differently, not to be the same. As in Doc. E and Doc. F the Federalists wanted, “every citizen to have the same option, the same passion, and the same interests.” Also, that “any such person being therefore convicted… shall be punished by fine, and imprisoned.” This was part of the Sedition Acts that the Federalists made partly to silence opposition from the Anti-Federalists.
The Anti-Federalists wanted a Bill of Rights because they believed that no government could be trusted to protect the liberties of its citizens; only by enumerating the natural rights of the people could there be any assurance that those rights would be preserved. In Doc. C, President Jefferson believed in independence for everyone. He stated that “all will, of course, arrange themselves under the will of the law, and unite in common efforts for the common good.” In Doc. D, the Constitution needed “to reform the federal system and to establish peace, order, and justice in the community,” but the Federalists saw it just as a “stepping stone” to set the same, identical values for everyone. One issue, agreed finally by both factions was the question of sovereignty. It would flow ultimately from the people. Resolving this problem made possible one of the distinctive features of the Constitution – its distribution of powers between the national and state governments.
Alexander Hamilton and the Federalists, and Thomas Jefferson and the Anti-Federalists disagreed about certain decisive issues about the Constitution, but both wanted the best government for the nation. The Federalists brought about a great contribution; the Bank of the United States. The Anti-Federalists helped the individual people of the United States with the Bill of Rights. These two great leaders contributed so much to the beginning of this great nation. Even if they did not agree with each other, they both wanted America’s government and economy to grow, prosper, and to bring the nation under a firm, stable Constitution.
The Research paper on Anti Federalists Rights Constitution Government
Anti-Federalists Vs. Federalists Essay Anti-Federalists Vs. Federalists Essay, Research Paper Essay Question # 7: Federalists v. Anti-Federalists The Constitution of the United States is the system of fundamental laws of ... direct responsibility to the people. The Federalists on the other hand believed that the danger particularly associated with republican governments was not aristocracy, ...
Note: This is a DBQ Essay for an AP American Histroy Class and may need more bcakground information and do not abreviate the word document!
