History research have shown and proved that the leading cause of the American Revolution was originated from economic and political problems. During the late seventeen hundreds, many tumultuous events resulted in Colonial opposition to Great Britain. The conditions of rights of the colonists will slowly be changed, as the constriction of the parliament becomes more and more intolerable. From 1763, Americans had only to be convinced that an arbitrary ruler- whether Parliament or King- was violating their rights, to feel that rebellion was justified. This bred them into a series of events that occurred between 1763 and 1776. The language used to protest the British Acts was legal, and political.
But the primary cause of the Revolution was economics. In theory, the colonists accepted the principle that natural laws rather than royal decrees should govern the economy. In practice only the southern colonies were bound to England by the tobacco trade. The New England and Middle Colonies, unable to find markets in Britain, found prosperity by trading outside the empire. Any attempt to stop this trade would lead to rebellion and consequently ensued. The idea of mercantilism where the channelizing of all trade through England, was a restriction upon economic prosperity of the New England colony.
The major cause for revolution within the economic theory is of economic subordination of colonies to England. The Grenville Ministry passed a number of acts, but of provocation to the colonists was the stamp act. On October 19, 1765 the stamp act Congress and Parliamentary Taxation committee’s passed some laws that attempted to strengthen the grip of the English crown. The stamp act was protested upon the principle of ‘no taxation without representation’. The stamp act was affecting virtually all the colonists, and restricted economic prosperity; thus colonists protested it. The Townshend acts were also a factor in the cause of the revolution.
The Essay on Similarities Between The Settler Societies Of New England, The Middle Colonies, Chesapeake, And The South
The settler societies of New England, the middle colonies, the Chesapeake, and the South had similarities as well as many differences, some being religious beliefs, labor, and their societies economic standpoint. In the article, “Advice to a Young Tradesman” by Benjamin Franklin, it’s stated, “…the way to wealth, if you desire it, is as plain as the way to market. It depends chiefly on two words, ...
Sam Adams had said, ‘The parliament was taxing illegally’, most colonists agreed, and a boycott of British goods resulted. When the British passed the Currency act, this left the paper money worthless, and the colonists had to rely on England for Hard Currency. The colonies were economically subordinate to England by the tea and coercive acts. The tea act was an act where the colonists’ middlemen merchants were bypassed, and the British did the trading. This hurt the economic prosperity of the colonists, mobs had strengthened in anger and the Boston Tea Party followed.
The British were irate at the colonial resistance to British law; therefore, the British passed the Coercive Act or ‘Intolerable Act’. The Intolerable act closed off the Boston Port, which closed off the center of economic prosperity of New England. England was also limiting the colonists to raw material production, which hindered the colonists’ economic prosperity. There are many other reasons that do not support the economic theory but support the political theories.
The Proclamation of 1763 restricted the settlement west of the Appalachians. This was done because the British had wanted to avoid conflict with the Indians. The colonists perceived this as an illegal act of restricting the colonists to a specific area. The writ of assistance is an example of a political liberty being narrowed in abolishing the right of privacy for the colonists. Colonial ideology was also a constituent in how the colonists viewed England. The colonists saw a conspiracy to destroy their liberty in British policies.
The Essay on A modernday revolution American turmoil in the 1960s
Hubert Humphrey once stated, ?When we say, ?One nation under God, with liberty and justice for all,? we are talking about all people. We either ought to believe it or quit saying it? (Hakim 111). During the 1960?s, a great number of people did, in fact, begin to believe it. These years were a time of great change for America. The country was literally redefined as people from all walks of life ...
Thus, when the colonists were forming the Declaration of Independence, the main goal was to show the Americans concern for the importance of liberty. The statement ‘The primary cause of the American Revolution is economics and politics’ is a very strong dictum which can be proved, but the American Revolution also was cause by a restriction of colonial liberty. The majority of the policies that affected the colonists between 1763 and 1776 were economic changes that limited the economic success of the colonies; furthermore, these policies also had negative political influences that led to the American Revolution. In conclusion, I feel that the American Revolution was inevitable. There were many that chose not to go by the British laws and felt they were unfair. The revolution maybe could have been avoided if they knew how to negotiate well..
