The movie, Philadelphia, was an excellent example of the severe discrimination many people with Aids are exposed to. In this instance the main character, Andy, was also gay. Unfortunately, in our society, he was faced with a double whammy. The gay is sis controversial enough, but to compound that in the work force with having Aids would be almost unbearable for any person to cope with. Tom Hanks played Andy with a serious need to communicate to the viewers how everyday life, work, emotions and being are affected by this kind of situation. The movie was well cast and thoughtfully portrayed Andy’s serious predicament.
The theme was very interesting. It made me realize how lucky I am to not have to deal with those kinds of problems. It’s really very frightening to realize, as Andy did, that even our legal system can be discriminating. When he started looking for a lawyer, he found many people who did not want to represent him because of his illness. The frustration he felt must ha been a real burden. Most people were afraid of him.
Even the man who finally represented him was afraid of him. He soon came to understand Andy was no threat to his health or his reputation, but someone he learned from and ended up becoming friends th. Andy himself feared his disease even before he was sure he had it. He did not want to go for his blood test. He didn’t want to face the reality of having Aids. He really didn’t have any choice.
After the doctor confirmed his fears and diagnosed him a having Aids, Andy began to deal with the news and the way it was changing his life and how people treated him. His employer was trying to shaft him. He fought for his rights, not knowing what the outcome would be, but knowing this was something he fel he must do. The turning point in the movie for Andy was when he was in the library trying to learn more about Aids. He was asked by the librarian to go to a private room. His lawyer was there and saw this happening, although he was hiding behind a pile of books.
The Essay on Andy Aids Internal Conflicts
... to overcome throughout the entire movie. The biggest is having to live with aids. Andy is a lawyer for a ... Joe Miller eventually agreed to take on Andy's case. Andy was in the library studying and as soon as ... were caused by aids. That would defiantly be a major internal conflict having to deal with people not liking you ... him and died peacefully also knowing that the people around him loved him.
guess this is when he realized Andy needed him to help protect his rights. It killed me to think just because someone has an illness people don’t understand that they can let their ignorance make them behave in a way they normally wouldn’t. To tell yo the truth I can’t honestly say I would have acted any different then the librarian did! ! ! The lawyer took the book Andy was holding out of his hand to show the librarian he was not afraid getting the disease by touching something Andy had touched. An must have felt one hell of a big relief when that happened! ! ! He finally had someone on his side. I hated the firm Andy worked for. At first they seemed okay, but after they tried shafting Andy, I was really pissed.
He worked for them, produced for them, was an asset to their business and then they just blew him off. The blowing him off part was nas bad as how they tried to do it. They tried to make him look like a loser. They cut down his work, his character, his abilities as an employee. What gives them the right to try and destroy someone’s life? ? Especially someone whose life is being anyway by the disease he has. The illness didn’t affect the way he did his job or how well he did it.
They were just a bunch of ignorant morons who didn’t care about anything other than how having someone with Aids working for them would make tm and their business look… and in their opinions it could ruin them. So, just fire the guy to cover their own asses. What a bunch of shit! ! ! ! Especially coming from the very institution that was supposed to help protect peoples’ rights, lawyers! ! The whole system must have really gotten to Andy. Especially because he was a part of that very same system. I agreed with the verdict of the trial hands down.
The Term Paper on Andy Warhol Images Art Work
... disposability. The artist who understood this best was Andy Warhol. He constantly warned people not to look any deeper than the surface ... of his art and life and yet he consistently connected the two. Through his works we are constantly reminded of ... search for artistic truths, Warhol stripped away the layers of make-believe and repression that had obscured the dark memories and ...
It really made me happy to see Andy get true justice. I also loved to see his so called ‘associates ” eat crow pie! ! ! ! I have to admit I was a little nervous during the trial. I wondered if the as strongly as I did about Andy’s situation. Justice prevailed, but Iknow this was only a movie. I have to ask myself how many people in the real world suffer from this kind of discrimination and don’t get the help Andy had.
It’s a terrible th out… really a terrible reality because it probably happens every day. The most important thing I learned from this movie is not to be too quick to pass judgment against people who, for whatever reason, are different than you are. It could be their health, financial status, color of their skin, the way they talk, their het age or the culture they grew up in. None of these things should matter.
People are people. They all deserve the same consideration, compassion and right to live their lives in a way that’s comfortable to them. No one should be so quick to ‘judge a ok by it’s cover! ! ! !’.
