The Oxford English Dictionary defines the word anger, a noun physical affliction or pain; inflammatory state of any part of the body. Then defines anger, a verb to distress, trouble, vex, hurt, wound. In Linda Pastan’s poem “Anger” the word anger takes the action of a noun. The word anger stands out for two reasons, the author chooses it for the title, and the only sentence with anger gives the poem meaning. In the beginning of the poem the word “it” gets used many times and we don’t know what “it” refers to until she actually states the word “anger,” then we realize the “it” referred to earlier means anger. She only uses the word “anger” once, “You whose anger is a pet dog” (pg 717, line 12).
She chooses to finally use the word “anger” here to show the reader that the person she refers to and her ways of dealing with anger differ. The magnitude of her anger causes her to remain secretive, though she wants to tell him she knows it will only make things worse. The serious thing about her anger remains that we don’t know what causes these feelings. We only know what she states, “But mine is a rabid thing, sharpening its teeth on my very bones, and I will never let it go.” (pg 717, lines 14-16) This is important for two reasons, first, it is the point at which we see how the author views her anger and to what subjective nature it is relevant.
Second, we come to know that her anger is also an adversary of hers, because something good, something friendly would not “sharpen its teeth” on your bones. Pastan knows releasing her anger or physical pain she will cause more problems, hence becoming even angrier. She can’t express her anger because the “other” she talks of causes her anger. Telling the “other” will only emotionally anger both of them. That’s why Pastan ends her poem with, “I will never let it go” (pg 717, line 16).
The Essay on Interpretation of Anger by Linda Pastan
An Interpretation of Anger by Linda Pastan Many poets compare animals to feelings or objects (whether tangible or intangible), because it is easy for a person to comprehend what an author is actually feeling through everyday comparisons to animals (i. e a lion symbolizes pride or courage). For example: In the poem “A Noiseless Patient Spider” by author Walt Whitman, he compares his soul to the ...
So despite its antagonistic nature, Pastan sees her anger as something she needs.
Also, it seems that she sees her anger as superior to the “other” person she speaks to. It is ironic that something harmful, even possibly fatal to a person would be held on to with such love and disregard. The anger she holds in this cage is seen by the reader as a problem due to the allusion. The cage, in which she holds her anger, implies a certain sense of imprisonment.
The anger is in the prison, but vice versa the anger can be seen as imprisoning her. At the end of the poem she states “I will never let it go” referring to her anger. This implies that she cherishes this anger or perhaps does not have the will to let her anger go. Pastan states, “You whose anger is a pet dog” referring to the other’s anger.
This shows the voluntary actions of the other’s anger. A pet dog is normally not very angry, so by saying this Pastan tries to implicate that this person has no anger or doesn’t reveal it. Another way to interpret this line is that the other has control of his anger. The way a owner controls his pet, the other controls his anger.
The poem though short has a lot to say about anger and the ways people should deal with it. People interpret the poem in many ways, but I see it has the author, a woman having anger toward another and can’t express her anger or cherishes it far to much to tell anyone. The man on the other hand controls or has no anger as we are told by Pastan. The main lesson states take control of your anger; don’t let your anger control you.
The Essay on Gun Control Empire State Building
One of the most controversial issues in our society is gun control legislation. Violence associated with guns is increasing every year and something must be done to stop it. Gun legislation varies in every state. In some states gun policy is stricter than in other states. Gun legislation should be abolished in favor of federal gun legislation. To analyze the problem with gun violence today you ...
