Also, in the story, the judge seems quite a bit more serious about making the jurors really think about what is going on and having them be conscience about the fact that if there is at all any doubt then they will have to vote ‘not guilty. ’ In the movie, the judge plainly says you, jurors, have to think about how the actions you take are going to affect the defendant. During deliberation there are multiple occasions where there are similarities between the story and the movie. One occasion, how the juror members are sitting around the table in order.
Another, how #3 is still a sadist. Also, juror #7 is very obnoxious and wants to leave early because he has places to go. The jurors’ votes are the same in the book and the movie. The first, second, third, and fourth vote remain the same throughout both of them. Another similarity is how the jurors think that #3 is ignorant due to the fact that he is a sadist and only wants to convict the boy of his charge so the boy can suffer. There are also several differences during deliberation in the short story and the movie version of 12 Angry Men.
For one example, in the story the foreman did not seem like he was in control at all and throughout the movie he was in more control. There were a lot of arguments and confrontations among the jurors during deliberation and the man that broke it up and calmed everyone down was the foreman. Another example, during the movie the jurors don’t truly care that much about the case. They are extremely sarcastic and they call #5 out and say that he is ‘soft’ just because he is one of the few that is actually listening to #8 give reasons to why the defendant is not guilty and testing the actual evidence to see if it is legitimate.
The Essay on Forrest Gump Movie Story Bench
Ideology The themes in the movie Forrest Gump are believed by some to be the search for destiny while understanding that simple is good. The movie features many ideas for someone s destiny. For example, are we all just floating around on a breeze or we all have a destiny in life that we need to figure out. The style of the movie is told by a man telling his life story from his point of view. The ...
Also, in the story, the #8 juror never once said that it was the lawyers fault for not questioning the sources that the testimonies’ stories were real. In the movie, the #8 juror strongly preaches that if the defendant’s lawyer was not court appointed and wanted the kid to win his case then there would have been another lawyer in the courtroom that day that would have actually questioned the testimonies.
Another difference between the story and the movie is in the story, the jury basically only said that the boy could have been the only one to kill his father due to the fact that the person that heard him scream “I’m going to kill you” said that he seen him running down the stairs with a hood over his head. Then in the movie #8 makes a strong point about how it could have been anyone that was in the area at that time could have done the dirty to the dad. There were only a few differences between the story and the movie.
In conclusion, I think that both the story and the movie were both very interesting because there were several similarities, but there were differences between the two of them. I thoroughly enjoyed reading the story then watching the movie. They are both very good. Another thing is that I would definitely recommend both of them to my friends. If there were no differences, then it would possibly be better but there were so it is what it is. The similarities are what made both the story and the book so interesting for me. Finally, the differences and the similarities played roles in the outcome of the story, but I still thought it was good.
