animal testing can be defined as the process of using animals in experiments. Normally the research such as biomedical researches, drug tests and toxicology tests are conducted in universities, medical schools, and pharmaceutical companies. Scientists use many types of animals in their experiments such as guinea pigs, hamsters, gerbils, monkeys, chimpanzees, rats, mice, dogs and cats. Around 50-100 millions vertebrates are used in experiments annually and in United States, the number of rats and mice used are 20 million annually.
The articles that are going to be discussed in this piece of writing are, “Animal Testing A Necessary Research Tool, for Now” written by Dr. George Poste and “Of Mice Or Men, The Problems With Animal Testing” written by Arthur Allen. The author of the article “Animal Testing; A Necessary Research Tool, for Now” agrees with animal testing since it saves lives and undoubtedly brings benefit to human health and animal health. Even though animal experimentation sounds wicked, it could not be denied that it plays important role in medical advance.
For instances, researchers have successfully discovered new drugs, vaccines and surgical implants that are first tested on animal. Nowadays, scientists are able to find many vaccines through experiments that are done on animals. Vaccine which is defined by Oxford Dictionary as a substance that is put into the blood and that protects the body from a disease is found after scientists test the animals by injecting them with drugs, chemical solutions or medicines.
The Research paper on Animal Testing Experiments Research Suffer
... about animal testing. In 1990 the British association for the advancement of science created a declaration in support of animal experiments. It stated, "Animal research has, ... go into horrendous details about the various tests that scientists perform often jade the issue of animal testing. I have heard about the rabbit ...
According to the author, the vaccines can be used on humans if the animals give a good response towards the tests because the animals have similar inner organs like in humans thus giving similar reactions like humans in the experiments done. The vaccines which are known after animal experimentation are vaccines for smallpox, measles, chickenpox, rubella, polio, rabies, mumps, scarlet fever, and tuberculosis. Besides, the writer argues in this article that animal testing should be replaced with other ways because it requires a huge amount of money.
The author of the second article, “Of Mice Or Men, The Problems with Animal Testing” believes that there is no problem with animal testing, but the only problem is the result which is not applicable to humans. He gives an example from an experiment done on some men. In the experiment, they are injected with tiny doses of TGN1412; the same doses given to some animals. Those animals do not have any ill effects but for the men, they writhe on the floor after a couple of minutes being injected.
Some of them suffered permanent organ damage, and one man’s head swelled up so horribly that British tabloids refer to the case as the “elephant man trial. ” This shows that animal testing does not necessarily bring benefit to humans. Moreover, the writer also suggests that new design in animal testing is needed such as the scientists can use transgenic mice with genes knocked out, inserted, or imported from the human genome. Instead of making more animal to suffer because of the unknown result or effect, this way can helps to give a better result since human genome is used.
In addition, the writers also include many examples and data to support his argument in this article. He brings them from the Health and Environmental Science Institute, Frederick Banting and Charles Best’s diabetic dogs, and Bureau of Mines’ George A. Burrell. Those data and examples are able to support and explain more upon the issues presented. Obviously, both articles are similar in discussing the same issue which is animal testing. The writers have convinced their readers throughout the articles by explaining the issue appropriately and by showing the examples and data to support their points.
The Term Paper on Animal Testing 5
Animal testing is used for many products worldwide. Also animal testing is used for a wide range of things, such as items in houses and medicines. Many places test on animals, such as private facilities, universities, and government laboratories. A big debate in today’s society is whether or not scientist should use animals for testing. Most of the animals die during or after the testing. Typing ...
Similarly the writers of the both articles agree that new ways should be found to replace animal testing. The writer of the first article, Poste says that the ideas of replacing animal testing with another ways are compelling since it could save hundreds of millions of dollars in facilities and personnel costs. Similar to Poste’s point, the writer of the second article, Allen also agrees with the idea of finding new ways to replace animal testing. He suggests the scientists to use transgenic mice with genes knocked out, inserted, or imported from the human genome.
It can give better result since the present of human genome in the animal. On the contrary, both articles have their own differences. In the article “Animal Testing A Necessary Research Tool, for Now”, the writer strongly believes that animal testing saves lives; however the writer in the second article says that the result got from the testing is not applicable to humans. Poste writes that animal testing is needed and important for human and animal health. He adds that it also plays important role in medical advance.
Many things have been discovered which give benefit to human such as the production of lifesaving drugs, vaccines, surgical procedures and improved diagnosis of disease. In contrast, Allen gives an example to show that the testing is not applicable to human. In an experiment, some men are injected with tiny doses of TGN1412; the same doses given to some animals. Those animals do not have any ill effects but for the men, they writhe on the floor after a couple of minutes being injected.
Lastly, the difference between these two articles is the first article has brought small amount of data and examples compared to the second article. Poste only includes several examples from some sources such as from The Arizona Republic and Animal Liberation Front whereas Allen includes many examples from many sources such as from The Health and Environmental Science Institute, University of Massachusetts, Frederick Banting and Charles Best’s Diabetic Dog.
The Term Paper on Animal Test Animals Tests Testing
And Justice for All These things are happening in laboratories around the world according to Elshtain: The wings of 74 mallard ducks are snapped to see whether crippled birds can survive in the wild. (They can t. ) Infant monkeys are deafened to study their social behavior, or turned into amphetamine addicts to see what happens to their stress level. Monkeys are separated from their mothers, kept ...
In conclusion, the two articles have two similarities and two differences. The similarities are both of the authors discuss the same issue and both of them agree to the idea of finding new ways to replace animal testing. The difference is Poste believes that animal testing saves lives whereas Allen says that the result got from the testing is not applicable to human. On the other hand, the first article has brought small amount of data and examples compared to the second article.
Without any doubts, animal testing does has its own advantages and disadvantages. It depends on us whether to agree or disagree with it. Some people might say that while humans are cured, animals are slaughtered. They acknowledge that animals also have feeling, consciousness and rights. The other people might say that we can get lots of benefits if animal texting is continuously done.
