The poor deserve to be poor because they are lazy; it is quite as simple as that. Of course, it is true that there are exceptions, but there is to every rule. However, in the case of the poor, as a group, they are all too often seen as groups deserving of sympathy. In fact, when a street peddler holds out his hand, some people feel too guilty to pass him by without giving him even a little bit of change. After all, he is so much worse off than they. The sociologists Karl Marx looked at life through an economists eyes but he had the heart of a philosopher.
His ideas about the ordering of society had much to do with economics as well as with morality and much of these may be found in the Marx-Engels reader. However, to get to the heart of the matter, Marxs and Engels Communist Manifesto provides the ultimate position on poverty. The reason why there are poor people, to Marx, is capitalism itself. This is true even though capitalism is supposedly part of a grand scheme where eventually communism would reign. In the mean time, with capitalism, business owners live well while workers are much like slaves, living a life of alienation. Marx and Engel said, in The Communist Manifesto: The bourgeoisie has stripped of its halo every occupation hitherto honored and looked up to with reverent awe. It has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid wage-laborers. Anyone can see this idea is as old as time.
Even today, doctors have been reduced to paid wage laborers, particularly with the advent of HMOs. The profession has been made corrupt by money. No longer can physicians practice, as they would like as they are tied into this system of beurocracy that is in todays world. Here, it is also seen that the essence of man is destroyed by a class war. One can no longer take pride in his or her own work as everything is reduced to a price. And that is what Marx saw as indicative of a system of government that did not value individual contribution. It is almost as if the workers are imprisoned and surely they have no choice.
... feudalism given way to industrial capitalism, so too would capitalism be overthrown. Analyzing 19 th-century capitalistic society, Marx and Engels perceived a class struggle ... the Industrial Revolution advanced, socialist critics blamed capitalism for creating a new class of poor, urban factory workers who labored under harsh ...
In society today, does the Wal Mart cashier or exotic dancer really have a choice? If they did, would they be participating in demeaning or demoralizing work, day after day, that does not allow them to reach their full human potential? Marx had written so extensively on the unfairness of capitalism that his motivation could only be that he cared a great deal about ethics and morality. What he saw going on around him was immoral and that prompted his writings, which appear largely economic. Underlying the talk about politics and money are very real concerns about the poorer factions. This comes through in much of his writings. While it is true that Marx had a Robin Hood type of philosophy, he would not have tolerated laziness. In fact, the point on which the Manifesto is based is that wage laborers were virtually slave laborers.
To Marx, this was wrong. Yet even in Marxs model, there is no room for laziness. He did not point to a bum on the street and feel sorry for him. Rather, he pointed to the people working long hours for low wages, people who were not lazy at all. To Marx, the lazy poor would deserve what they would get. Sadly his proposal for ultimate happiness is communism, which isnt like capitalism, though dependent on it for an economic base. But he didnt say that all poor people are lazy but he did see a class division based on distribution of power, which was something that they didn’t control.
Maybe Marx made a conscious decision in not going over the issue of laziness specifically, however it is apparent what he thought on the subject, but one can only imagine what he really thought.
Marx, Karl and Engels Friedrich. The Communist Manifesto, New York: Bantam books, 1992. Tucker, Robert C. The Marx-Engels Reader, New York: W.W. Norton &Co., 1978 Macionis, John. Sociology Eighth Edition, pg96-101, New Jersey: Kenyon College, Prentice Hall.
The rich, the middle class, and the poor; are described by the way we live and the amount of money one has. There are many different ways of describing what poverty is, whether it is by how you live, how much money you have, or in statistical terms. Poverty isnt always a bad thing it is just another way of living, another way of life. There are different kinds of poverty that you can measure. ...