In this essay I will be describing the virtue of bravery. I will first define what Aristotle thinks virtue is, explain the virtue of bravery, and then finally reflect this virtue on my personal experience in the Shaw neighborhood. Aristotle breaks down virtue into four aspects which are: a state that decides in mean, consisting in a mean, the mean relative to us, which is defined by reference to reason (1107 a).
He also states that there are two kinds of virtue: one of thought or intellect and one of character or actions. He also states that virtue is a state of character and is achieved by habit.
Aristotle uses several examples to define a the bravery virtue. He say that as humans we fear all bad things such as, bad reputation, poverty, sickness, friendlessness, and death. However he says that these things do not concern a brave person. Fearing this things are not all neccesarily bad though.
Fearing something like a bad reputation is good and shows that you are decent and properly prone to shame, unlike if you do not fear this you have no feeling of disgrace. Someone who has no fear of this might be considered brave by some people. However there are some things that are wrong to fear such as poverty or sickness, things that are caused by ourselves, people who do not fear these things are not considered brave. Sometimes someone who is not fearful of things caused by ourselves may be considered brave when compared to someone who is cowardly in wartime or someone faced with losing money (1115 a 10-25).
The Essay on Why Good Things Happen to Bad People
In The Problem of Evil, Eleonore Stump, summarizes and debates three accounts to why there is evil in the world. She concludes with a solution rather similar to Hicks. Stump believed that evil exists due to free will. It was displayed in the Christian story of Adam & Eve. She believes that though Evil does exist, it is necessary for there to be a relationship between people and God. The good ...
Aristotle also comes to the conclusion that a brave person is only concerned with death in the finest conditions. These kind of deaths are found in war and circumstances when it is honored by cities and monarchs. Aristotle? s next step is to define a brave person? s state of character. He asks the question, What does a brave person find frightening? He answers with, a brave person is frightened by the same things any human can find irresistible, but the difference is that he will stand firm against it until the end, and he is not frightened by things which are are not irresistable. ? Hence whoever stands firm against the right things and fears the right things, for the right end, in the right way, at the right time, and is correspondingly confident is the brave person. ? (1115 b 15-20) Aristotle then explains that a brave person aims at what is fine.
What is fine to a brave person is bravery. Therefore the end is fine, since each thing is defined by its end. A brave person shows what bravery is by standing firm and through his actions. A brave person who goes to excess is one who is excessively fearless. They are excessively confident about frightening things, making them rash. Sometimes this person may be a boaster and a pretender to bravery.
A rash person will act that they are fearless and appear to have qualities of the brave person but they never stand firm against anything frightening. A rash person wishes for dangers to come, but when they do he cowers, but a brave person is eager in action and keeps quiet until then. A brave person that has deficiency is a coward. He fears the wrong things in the wrong way.
He has a deficiency in confidence and he is afraid of everything, while the brave person is hopeful which is one of the ends of confidence. ? Hence the coward, the rash person and the brave person are all concerned with the same things, but have different states related to them; the others are excessive or defective but the brave person has the intermediate and right state. ? (1115 a 5-7) Aristotle then distinquieshes between some misconception of what most people assume bravery is, when in all actuality these are not genuine bravery; bravery of citizens, experience and expertise, emotion, hopefulness, ignorance. He says that citizen? s bravery comes first because they stand firm against dangers with the aim to avoid legal problems or gaining honors. He also says the bravest seem to be, ? those who hold cowards in dishonour and do honour to brave people.
The Term Paper on Ethics In Frankenstein And Brave New World
Ethics in "Frankenstein" and "Brave New World" For most of human history, the ethical considerations of scientific inquiry would have been a moot point. Outside of the Bible and mythology, there was no thought of creating life from inert matter because scientists would not have felt it was possible to do so. In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, however, in the wake of landmark discoveries in ...
? (1116 a 20-23) He states that a lot of the time this class of people are compelled to be brave because of their superiors, when they should be brave when it is fine and not just when they are compelled. The second experience and expertise he explains is a so-called state of bravery because in the example of the soldier who say has been to war more than once, will be appear more brave than one who is going into battle for the first time. These same people are also the ones who are the ones with the most capable in attack and defence. This does not make them brave it just makes them strongest and physically superior. However these people are the first to become cowardly when the danger overstrains them, and them are more afraid of being killed than doing something shameful which is not of a brave person? s character.
The next state of so-called bravery he explains is emotion. He says that for those who act on emotion are considered are brave, such as the beast who attacks after it has been wounded. He uses a quote from Homer to illustrate the importance of emotion in the human experience, ? put strength in his emotion? , ? aroused strength and emotion? , ? keen strength in his nostril? , and? his blood boiled? . (1116 b 28-30) He also distiqueshes from his example of the animal who was wounded and the human experience by stating that brave people act because of what is fine and therefore their emotion cooperates with them, while beasts are not necessarily brave because distress and emotion drives them in an impulsive rush to meet danger. Finally he explains that emotion is just similar to bravery and that if you must fight to be brave, it must be because of what is fine. The next so-called state of bravery he explains is hopefulness.
The Term Paper on Brave New World People Society State
Dystopian Societies in Literature and in Life Ever since man began making tools, he has been in search of a better life. For some it is not just a better life they are after but a perfect life. These people are in search of a utopia. Philosophers and novelist have been teaching classes and writing books on how to reach a perfect society with no grief or turmoil. The philosopher Karl Marx wrote " ...
He says their bravery comes from a series of victories over many opponents which then makes them confident. He says that they are similar but their confident for the wrong reason being that they feel they are stronger and nothing could happen to them, and when things turn for the worse they run. The final state of so-called bravery is ignorance. They are similar to the hopefull people, however they lack their self-esteem. He says that the hopefull people will stand firm for some time while the ignorant people if deceived and them realize or suspect something is different they run. In the final description of bravery Aristotle relates bravery to confidence and fear, pleasure and pain.
He says that a person is brave if he is in a right state about these as appose to being in a state with inspiring confidence. He once again explains that it is bravery when someone stands against something painful because it is harder than to stand against something which is pleasant. However, in the end bravery seems to end and pleasant things as appose to what surrounds it until the end. I will end this part of the paper with a quote which I thinks sums up what Aristotle is saying, ? Hence it is not true that the active exercise of every virtue is pleasant; it is pleasant only in so far as we attain the end. ? (1117 b 19-17).