Article Review Crimes in cyberspace however fantastic they were became a natural thing today. Many people spend in cyberspace more time than in reality, in other words they live in virtual world. And as well as real one the cyberspace is liable to different types of crimes. The article I want to review deals with the computer crime. In the light of recent events and increase of computer crimes the topic is more than relevant. In what ways this article can be useful? First of all, as it is known ignorance cannot reprieve. That is why knowledge of existing forms of computer crimes, what can be estimated as one, and what punishment follows. Ronald B. Standler states The fundamental issue in most computer crime is the criminals’ lack of respect for the property or privacy of other people.
I hope that society will recognize the seriousness of computer crime and demand more severe punishment for such criminals. (Computer Crime) His article in evident, well-argued and informative way explains his position toward this question. It starts with introduction, which familiarize us with main aspects of the problem. I like the way author prepares audience for his point of view. He gives all necessary information on computer crimes in terse but understandable way. While reading the article you receive information, which then helps to understand nuances of jurisdiction. Ronald B. Standler skillfully alternates laws with life examples.
The Term Paper on Internet Crime Computer Criminal Crimes
INTERNET CRIMES (c) Belden Singh and Annette John The wired world anticipates the convenient alternative of on-line shopping and e- commerce or e-banking or e-insurance. Imaging science will dramatically improve digitised images, which will be a boom to virtual museums, galleries and telemedicine. Many retailers will become e-tailers. Behind this new dimension of rapid advances in technology is ...
It helps reader to become fully aware of current situation in this field. Article of Ronald B. Standler is designed in a way which confidently leads us through the heaps of definitions, descriptions and argumentations to the understanding of main thesis computer crimes demand more severe punishment. And here is the point where Im not totally convinced. Of course, Im totally agree that computer crime is the criminals’ lack of respect for the property or privacy of other people but it doesnt mean that all computer crimes must be punished as sever as robbery for example. For me it is very hard to compare hacker with simple criminal, yes, technically both of them are perpetrators but I think that punishment for crimes in cyberspace must differ from the ordinary ones.
People who are able to crack software are usually well educated in the sphere of Computer Science and IT. They are very weird because they live in secluded environment of their own kind. They have strange and usually odd scale of moral values and even more obscure ethic. According to Steven Mizrach computer underground may be divided into six groups: hackers, phreaks, virus writers, Pirates, cypherpunk, anarchists and cyberpunks as combination of all above mentioned. Steven Mizrach states, Every profession or trade tends to have an ethical code which suggests that it is capable of self-regulation of its members. The code demonstrates the shared core values necessary for people to practice within the professional community.
And it enables the public and the government to have some degree of trust for the profession. (Old and New Hacker Ethics) Accordingly to his statement we can assume that hackers and pirates also have some ethic and they really do. Hackers ethic is very intricate and sometimes reminds me the one of noble thieves. They codex have many paragraphs and is very intricate. They stated that information wanted to be free which means without restrictions (freedom of movement = no censorship), without control (freedom of change/evolution = no ownership or authorship, no intellectual property), or without monetary value (no cost.) (Old and New Hacker Ethics) The next important step in understanding of their ethics states that information must be shared among the people because everyone has the right to try this or that software product. Many of them still and distribute programs because they think that product is overpriced.) There are also a kind of piracy when software is distributed freely (through friends or Internet) In such cases the company doesnt lose money and doesnt gain them either. What kind of crime can be considered as ethical? Still, none of it I think, and such crimes deserve punishment only it ought to consider how specific the perpetrators are.
The Term Paper on Computer Crime Psychological Hackers Type Criminals
Psychological Profiling of Computer Crime The psychological analysis of computer criminals is a start for preventing further computer crime related activity. Learning to identify personal characteristics of hackers will help to measure the threat they " ll have on a computers security software. There are many classifications which hackers fit into that define their capabilities. With this data ...
As for the viruses, worms and malicious codes I want to cite Larry Rogers: Technology changes rapidly, as do the ways intruders take advantage of that technology. If you know the goal of computer security, you can better adapt to these inevitable technological changes. And you can better safeguard your computer resources against the inevitable intruder attacks, keeping what belongs to you yours until you say otherwise! (The Goal of Computer Security or What’s Yours is Yours Until You Say Otherwise) In other words, you know that cyberspace is not a safe environment and if you are interested to work in it you must safely protect your computer. Different kinds of attacks and burglaries, however destroying they are, still have positive effect people began to understand the importance of good protection. Maybe my position is imposed with the stereotypes based on the unprofessional point of view (Journalists often glorify or praise the criminal suspect, by admiring his programming “talent”, or even calling him a “genius”) but I have right on it. (Computer Crime) Though, I like the way Standler describes reports of computer crime Im fully agree that 90% of journalists doesnt have slightest notion about of what they are writing about.
As the result publicity receive attractive and enigmatic figure of criminal form cyberspace. As conclusion I want to say that no matter in what points I disagree with the author of this article, I support his idea about respect for the property or privacy of other people, both in real and virtual life.
Bibliography:
Larry Rogers, The Goal of Computer Security or What’s Yours is Yours Until You Say Otherwise!,2005. www.cert.org Steven Mizrach, Old and New Hacker Ethics Ronald B. Standler, Computer Crime, 1999-2002. .
The Essay on Computer Security 3
... year. Computer crime is not always just for profit, sometimes the goal is just destruction. One of the main solutions to computer security problems ... Computer security is the means by which the computer industry is combating computer crime. This topic was chosen because there is an ever- ... as much as possible. The last solution to the computer security problem that we are going to discuss is creating ...