An old, sick beggar. A sight that brings out the pity in almost any human being. How can it not? A beggar who does not have enough food to eat, no shelter against the rain clothes that are not warm enough. All these things are enough to drive someone crazy.
Picture this: you have at least one warm meal every day, you have clothes that can keep you warm in any winter, you have a home to go every night. A beggar has none of these. Imagine you being deprived of even the simplest of your possessions. Wouldn t you fell unwanted, powerless and scared.
Well beggars feel this way every day. There are many different approaches people have towards beggars. Scientists have one, economists and historians another and artists a different one yet. A biologist will look at the beggar and think of all the bacteria and the viruses on the beggar s clothes. It is the job of a biologist to analyse these factors rather than deal with social problems a beggar can create.
I do not want to say that biologists are insensitive towards beggars, they are just trained to overcome the appalling nature of diseases and sickness and to fight them. However another type of scientist, a psychiatrist will look a beggar from a different perspective. He or she will want to talk to the beggar and try to analyse the social aspect of the beggar. Why did that person become a beggar? Or how is he or she coping with the reality of being a beggar? These are the types of questions a psychiatrist might ask. These are the probable views from a scientific point of view. However there are views that totally differ from those of scientist.
The Term Paper on How Could a Scientist Defend the View That Science Has Failed Mankind in View of the Large Number of Problems Created?
How could a scientist defend the view that science has failed mankind in view of the large number of problems created? Science has created problems for mankind. Science is a blessing all right, but it is not an unmixed blessing. Science has made life easier and more comfortable. Science has made it possible for us to communicate with each other readily and quickly and it has made travel easy and ...
An economist might look at the beggar and think of the state of the country s economy. From an economist s point of view a beggar is a burden to the society. They only take and do not give anything in return. However this might not be the case since a beggar does not take much from the economy. What does a beggar need? Some food, water and maybe an old coat that was about to be thrown away any way.
Another opinion about beggars might come from another social scientist, a historian. He or she might look at a beggar and remember a time of war when many people were affected. He or she might find similarities between the beggar and the poverty in war time. Social scientist are not the only one who might have opinions about beggars. Artists and sculptors can have their own perception about beggars. An artist is walking down the street.
At a corner he or she sees a beggar lying on the street. The artist might be fascinated by the contrast of colour of the beggar s clothing or by the shapes and shadows that appear on the crooked body of the beggar. He or she might want to use this contrast in their future paintings. A sculptor might also have a idea about the beggar. For example he or she might be intrigued by the way the beggar matches with the sidewalk. This balance of shapes and curves might create a sculpture that will be the world s greatest work of art.
And what was the original inspiration of the sculptor? An old sick beggar. Similarly a poet could be waiting for a train one morning and he or she might see an old beggar waking up cold, lonely and scared. A poem might come to the poet s mind about the hardships of life, the misfortune of some and great fortune of others. About the unfairness of life, about the harsh reality of today s world. From all of the above we can see that many different people have many different perceptions and views about beggars. However beggars are not the only concept that creates different opinions in different areas of study.
Things like laws, politics and other social aspects of life have many different interpretations in the different fields of study. There are many different ways people interpret everything and anything. Even common objects like a chair or a window might mean something totally different to a scientist and an artist. Out of the many possibilities of judgements people can choose from there are usually two main one that appear: the beauty and the ugliness of an object or a person. Pure scientist usually see the dark and ugly side of life as opposed to artist and creative people.
The Essay on Contributions Of Artists And Scientists To Society
Any society is developed by the contributions of its members. Two main contributions are those of artists and those of scientists. Both types of contributions share some common qualities; however, they differ in many other aspects. The contributions of artists and those of scientists share some similarities. First of all, they are indispensable and they require time and effort. Without them, life ...
This might be because the scientists generally understand the “real way’ in which the world works. They know how diseases affect many people, how the destructive force of weapons can cripple cultures forever. Social scientists have a similar outlook towards life. They usually understand the problems of the world and they are more in touch with them. This makes them more aware of the difficulties of life so they are not usually happy and cheerful. People of the creative have are however most of time the opposite.
Artists and poets usually interpret the world in their own way and then give us their opinion about something. For example an artist see the sunset at the sea and he or she paints a wonderful picture that is both soothing and beautiful. Similarly a poet can hear the chirping of the birds in the forest and write a love poem to reflect on this wonderful sound. Most of the art that is appreciated and liked by the general public is very relaxed and pleasant to look upon. It is rarely dark, sarcastic and pessimistic. There are of course exceptions to the rules but they are few.
Although there are many different ways in which the world can be interpreted usually people split into two groups: good and bad, black and white. This shows the human outlook on the world. People like to be a part of a larger group because we are developed mammals who need company just like the chimpanzees, lions and all the other mammals out there. We also like opposition, something to fight against. That is why there is a separation of tastes. Yet even if we choose different paths of knowledge and perception we are all alike in that we are humans..
