Ben Jonson These poems of Ben Jonson are immortal pieces of poetry. His love is not passionate but metaphysical in nature. My picture left in Scotland beautifully describes the physical and metaphysical nature of love in its very subtle manner. Is love the attraction of physical mould or a spiritual attainment? Since ages love is being raised in various philosophies and its greatness being ascribed in words and spirits both. But what makes love different is its silent absorption over the sandy edges of time reaching beyond the physical attraction and passion. The philosophical discussion regarding Ben Jonson being lover in his poems logically begins with questions concerning its nature.
This implies that love has a ‘nature’, a proposition that some may oppose arguing that love is conceptually irrational, in the sense that it cannot be described in rational or meaningful propositions. For such critics, who are presenting a metaphysical and epistemological argument, love may be an ejection of emotions that defy rational examination; on the other hand, some languages, do not even admit the concept, which negates the possibility of a philosophical examination. Presuming love has a nature; it should be, to some extent at least, describable within the concepts of language. But what is meant by an appropriate language of description may be as philosophically beguiling as love itself. Such considerations invoke the philosophy of language, of the relevance and appropriateness of meanings, but they also provide the analysis of ‘love’ with its first principles. Does it exist and if so, is it knowable, comprehensible, and describable? Love may be knowable and comprehensible to others, as understood in the phrases, “And cast my love behind “, as she cannot imbrace my mountaine belly and my rockie face”, but what ‘love’ means in these sentences may not be analyzed further: that is, the concept ‘love’ is irreducible-an axiomatic, or self-evident, state of affairs that warrants no further intellectual intrusion.
The Essay on Red Rose Love Nature Wordsworth
The first author is William Wordsworth with the poem "Lines Written in Early Spring"; he has a way of bringing out nature's great offerings. The following author will be Robert Burns with his poem "A Red, Red Rose." I heard a thousand blended notes, While in a grove I sat reclined, In that sweet mood when pleasant thoughts Bring sad thoughts to the mind (1-4) Wordsworth is describing how he is ...
If love does possesses ‘a nature’ which is identifiable by some means-a personal expression, a discernible pattern of behavior, or other activity, it can still be asked whether that nature can be properly understood by humanity. Love may have a nature, yet we may not possess the proper intellectual capacity to understand it-accordingly, we may gain glimpses perhaps of its essence-as Socrates argues in The Symposium, but its true nature being forever beyond humanity’s intellectual grasp. Accordingly, love may be partially described, or hinted at, in a dialectic or analytical exposition of the concept but never understood in itself.
Love may therefore become an epiphenomenal entity, generated by human action in loving, but never grasped by the mind or language. Love may be so described as a Platonic Form, belonging to the higher realm of transcendental concepts that mortals can barely conceive of in their purity, catching only glimpses of the Forms’ conceptual shadows that logic and reason unveil or disclose. Modern romantic love returns to version of the special love two people find in each other’s virtues-one soul and two bodies, as he poetically puts it. It is deemed to be of a higher status, ethically, aesthetically, and even metaphysically than the love that behaviourists or physicalists describe. Let me appreciate this timeless poet who has marvelously picked all the aspects of love in few lines of his poems. To penshurst majorily gives a reflection of this poet lover as an expressionist. Expressionist love is similar to behaviourism in that love is considered an expression of a state of affairs towards a beloved, which may be communicated through language (words, poetry, music) or behaviour (bringing flowers, giving up a kidney, diving into the proverbial burning building), but which is a reflection of an internal, emotional state, rather than an exhibition of physical responses to stimuli. Others in this vein may claim love to be a spiritual response, the recognition of a soul that completes one’s own soul, or complements or augments it. The spiritualist vision of love incorporates mystical as well as traditional romantic notions of love, but rejects the behaviorist or physicalist explanations.
The Essay on Human Nature Time Understand Environment
What is human nature? It is very simple. Human nature refers to the patterns of behavior that are typical of our species or our kind. Human undergoes change as all humans grow up they nature seems to change; the environment someone grow up in effects that persons nature. To fully understand human nature Dr. Marvin Harris takes us on trip to time, which makes sense because if we better understand ...
Those who consider love to be an aesthetic response would hold that love is knowable through the emotional and conscious feeling it provokes yet which cannot perhaps be captured in rational or descriptive language: it is instead to be captured, as far as that is possible, by metaphor or by music. The strong bent of nature is seen in the proportion which this topic of personal relations usurps in the conversation of society. The natural association of the sentiment of love with the heyday of the blood seems to require, that in order to portray it in vivid tints, which every youth and maid should confess to be true to their throbbing experience, one must not be too old. The delicious fancies of youth reject the least savour of a mature philosophy, as chilling with age and pedantry their purple bloom. According to the author, the lover of the penshurst, love is not merely for a change that we should not turn to it; not merely for the sights and sounds that it offers; not merely for the peace that it ensures; but for something more than all these, to be in it, to be one with it;to see the divine glory in all its beauty and perfection, splendour and ecstasy; to feel love and have the joy of its invisible presence. The poet as a lover has a great soul and his descriptions in the poem are immense.
Conclusively the soul may be trusted to the end. That which is as beautiful and attractive as these relations must be succeeded and supplanted only by what is more beautiful, and so on for ever. Bibliography 1) Helen C. White et al., eds, Seventeenth-Century Verse and Prose (New York: Macmillan, 1951).
2) W. T.
S. Thackara. The Perennial Philosophy. 1984 . Theosophical University Press. 3) Peter Desa Wiggins.
The Essay on Love In The Road Less Traveled
... is a circular process, Third - The definition includes self-love as love for the other, Fourth - The definition implies effort, and ... ... happiness and full-fillment"(page 105).Although Peck makes valid points that love is not the only thing to live for, First Corinthians ... hurt, the suffering, or the unhappiness."The only true end of love is spiritual growth or human evolution"(page 106). The Bible ...
Donne, Castiglione and the Poetry of Courtliness. Indiana University Press (January 2001)..
