Do you agree with the view that, in the years 1838-48, attempts to enact the Charter failed because the Chartists’ political campaigns were undermined by Chartist violence? It can be perceived that violence undermined the Chartist’s political campaigns, eventually leading to the fail of the Charter induction. Multiple occurrences of violent acts broke out across the country that led to destruction of property and damages, often resulting in the loss of respectable support. Many also interpret that general leadership, the government and economy also impacted Chartism, ultimately resulting in the failure of its principles. Analysing the sources 4, 5 and 6 it is clear that their political campaigns were undermined by Chartist violence but leadership was more significant in undermining the Chartists’ political campaigns. One factor that significantly impacted the political campaigns of the Chartists and ultimately led to the failed induction of the Charter is Leadership. A difference in opinion and varied ways of governing would prove to create problems for the Chartist movement and lead to its eventual failure. Source 4, Crime and Punishment in England from John Briggs published in 1996, analyses the damage of violence but how leadership problems would lead to these events occurring. It is the least reliable of the three sources as it has less factual detail than the others. It states ‘the immediate consequence was the loss of respectable support’ this is a result if their followers were to lose sight and resort to physical force. It is made apparent that this was a problem for radical reformers and justifies that their leadership would inevitably create such events and causes them to create future obstructions.
The Essay on Political Leadership
Political Leadership and the Problem of the Charismatic Power Author(s): Carl J. Friedrich Source: The Journal of Politics, Vol. 23, No. 1, (Feb. , 1961), pp. 3-24 Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Southern Political Science Association Stable URL: http://www. jstor. org/stable/2127069 Accessed: 04/08/2008 17:34 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of ...
Source 5 is from The life of Thomas Cooper, written by himself published in 1872 indicates contradictions in the motivations of Chartist supporters. It is the most applicable source as it is an account from an actual Chartist member. It states ‘I told them that this strike for the Charter would bring ruin’, this indicates the contradictive notions of Chartist leadership as thousands were motivated by alternative means. Thomas Cooper indicates here that those involved were actually the enemies of freedom and were not in support of Chartism but against it. Source 6, The Age of Improvement from Asa Briggs published in 1959 indicates how Chartism lost much of its vitality. It provides factual information with no such extra detail that provides an element of biased. It states ‘its appeal was being undermined by personal and political differences among the leaders’, this clearly agrees with that of Source 5 that there were contradictions in leadership which then led supporters to begin differing and reaffirming their loyalties. All 3 sources clearly show how Leadership led to the undermining of the Chartist’s political campaigns as due to it, support was lost and often split creating multiple problems that impacted the movement considerably. Another factor that can be seen to undermine Chartist’s political campaigns was violence.
All 3 sources do indicate an element of violence but to differing extents. Source 4 explains the negative impacts of violence and how it would lose credible support for the Chartists. It however, doesn’t say that these violent events actually occurred and speaks hypothetically stating the potential consequences and not the actual ones. Source 5 highlights the actual violent acts that occurred and condemns those involved in this, being identified as Chartists. Leader, Thomas Cooper contradicts previous leadership by saying they are now going against and being the enemies of freedom. Source 6 doesn’t really indicate violence as the other two sources do but does mention the intervention of the police within the fiasco of Kennington Common. It still only mentions a small crowd and no actual acts of violence. Violent acts did have an impact as they directed the focus away from popular opinion and applying the pressure through organised demonstrations. It is clear though that these violent occurrences were due to poor leadership and severe contradictions between leaders that led to split support and considerable loss of followers. False leadership created these violent outbursts which also led to other factors being implemented such as government additions and the economy. The government gave much opposition towards Chartism and often did not consider it worthy of recognition.
The Essay on Sharing Leadership Patrol Lead
Sharing Leadership Song: She " ll Be Coming 'Round the Mountain She " ll be coming 'round the mountain when she comes, 'Whoo, Hoo' Driving six white horses... 'Whoa Back' We " ll all go out to meet her... 'Hi Babe' We " ll kill the old red rooster... 'Hack, Hack' We " ll all have chicken 'n dumplings... 'Yum, Yum' We " ll wear our bright red woo lies... 'Scratch, Scratch'-The subject of this ...
Source 4 is the only source out of the 3 to include the government as it states ‘a gift to the government of perfect justification for repressive action’ this can be linked with violence as it explains how this would impact the Chartism success, ultimately helping the government in dissolving them as opposition completely. It would show that repressing action leads to violence and does not work for the greater good only having negative impacts on society and the country in general. The economy is also a factor that ultimately contributed to why the Chartists’ political campaigns were undermined. In Source 6 it explains how the Anti-Corn Law League and the revival of trade unionism worked against Chartism and that they helped undermine the personal and political difference among the leaders. However it states ‘The economic crisis of 1847-48 gave it a final lease of life’, this initially suggests a positive for Chartism but due to the fiasco of Kennington Common it was doomed to fail and in no way help the Chartist movement. The economy factor can be linked with leadership as the split decisions and contradictions between leaders combined with elements like the revival of trade unionism which had negative implications on Chartism. Identifying all of the sources and analysing their contents, a verdict can be reached that leadership was the main reason to why the Chartists’ political campaigns were undermined which effectively led to the failed attempts at enacting the Charter.
The Essay on South Africa Mandela Violence Government
Nelson Mandela and his New Nation From 1900 to 1901 the British Army conquered Dutch settlers known as Boers in the Boer War and South Africa became a of the whites in South Africa are Boers. In 1948 the National Party started apartheid, which meant only British colony. The Boers beca the main voting support for the dominant National Party; over 50% of the whites could vote, and that blacks had to ...
Multiple split decisions, contradictions and lack of communication created problems for Chartism which then led to outbursts of violence and a significant loss of support. Leadership was the most significant reason but violence, the government and the economy also contributed to some extent.
