Can Computers understand? 1) Thinking is the hallmark of understanding. 2) Only special machines can think. 3) If something can think it can understand. 4) Only special machines that can think can understand. 5) ‘Mental’s tates and their resulting actions are products of the center of activity (brain).
6) To understand, thoughts must be produced by the brain. 7) A computer’s mental states and events are controlled by a program. 8) The program is not a product of the computer. 9) A computer does not produce ‘thoughts’ in its brain. 10) A computer cannot understand. John Searle addresses the point of the ability of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to understand, in Mind Brains, and Programs.
His main argument is that because AI’s are computers and computers have no thoughts of their own, they cannot understand. Any actions being performed to simulate behavior are confined by the programs available to the computer. He presents the example of a man linking Chinese characters and appearing to know the language, but in reality the man is just following the instructions given to him (the program).
This example serves well to explain how although a computer can look like it understands a story, it can do no more than ‘go through the motions.’ Of course such a definitive standpoint on an issue as controversial as the capacity of an AI to understand will draw many critics. The criticism of his theory that I find to be the most credible is The Other Mind Reply offered by Yale University.
The Essay on Computer Program Programming Programmer Programmers
Is computer programming a career I would like to pursue Chapter 1 What is computer programming A program is basically a set of directions to a given destination. Say your friend asks you, "where do u Live." You reply, "Down the street until the first right, go right there and it is the second house on the left." You have just given a program and you are the programmer for giving those directions. ...
This line of thinking asks: if behavior is what we can determine the presence of cognition through, and an AI passes a behavioral test, why don’t we attribute cognition to it? I myself do not believe in the philosophy of AI understanding, because to support either side on this issue one must have a belief for or against the ability of man to create another being capable of thought. I do not believe that any machine based creature we may ever create has the ability to think. Thought is something that is independently done and cannot be given to another, or more accurately, programmed in. Regardless of however many tests that may be passed simulating thought and understanding, a programmed being is not capable of thought and understanding.
