The right of the state to take the life of a person convicted of certain crimes is deeply rooted in concepts of governmental sovereignty and has been recognized in England as the source of our Common Law and most other historic governmental systems around the world throughout history. In the beginning of the twenty-first century, many are beginning to doubt the wisdom of government sanctioned murder under the name of capital punishment in criminal justice system. There is debate over the morals and effectiveness of such a harsh and irreversible sentence. Most commonly, the death penalty is challenged as a violation of the Eighth Amendment, which says that the U.S. cannot use “cruel and unusual” punishment. The purpose of our entire criminal justice system is to protect the rights of life, liberty, and property for all its citizens. To do this, the punishment for crime must be harsh enough to deter potential criminals. Unfortunately, the death penalty may just be an easy escape for the criminal.
Criminals should have to face the enormity of the crimes they committed everyday of their lives – they need a punishment to fit their crime. If the society kills the killers, then the moral line between the killer and the society becomes blurred. The death penalty is state sponsored killing. Capital punishment should be stopped, because it is unjust, ineffective deterrent, and a broken system. First, capital punishment can not be justified. Capital punishment is a serious failure of humanity, immoral and an act of torture.
The Essay on Let The Punishment Fit The Crime 2
Justice should mean helping victims as well as punishing offenders. This story and our criminal justice system ignore the problem of restoring fairness for victim as a principle of justice. We set two primary foals for our criminal penalties. We want them to deter crime and we want them to rehabilitate criminals. In theory, these two goals should go together, since they amount to saying that we ...
Every human being deserves the dignity of life. This includes the most brutal of murderers. It is an indication of how little our government values human life. We do not condone torture or cruelty but it cannot be denied that some executions are botched and those executed suffer extended pain. Even those who die instantly suffer mental anguish leading up to the execution. Examples of torture and cruelty are documented in Florida within the last few years. In 1997, Pedro Medinas head caught fire while he was being electrocuted in Florida (Progressive 65).
State attorney general Bob Butterworth commented, People who wish to commit murder, they better not do it in the state of Florida, because we may have a problem with our electric chair (Progressive 65).
In 1999, that state had another botched execution in June, Allen Lee Davis started to bleed profusely from the nose and appeared to suffer extreme pain during electrocution. After the machine was turned off, he continued to breath. Witnesses say his chest rose and fell about ten times before he went still, reported the New York Times (Progressive 65).
Floridas legislative solution to these atrocities has been to offer an alternative method of execution in the form of lethal injection. Although the electric chair is gruesome, other methods of execution currently practiced in other areas of the United States- particularly hanging and the gas chamber- are capable of producing excruciating pain as well. Robert Murray was sentenced to death for two murders he committed with his brother in 1991 who is imprisoned in Arizona.
Murray expressed his own feelings in the following statement, They have given me two methods to consider: lethal injection and lethal gas. I often imagine myself in the gas chamber and try to guess at the difference between dying there and dying by lethal injection. But I just keep coming back to the outcome. I wanted to ask someones advice about which method I should choose, but dead is dead, there is much more to death by injection than just falling asleep, beginning with the long wait on death row, the terror of being taken to the death house, the helpless panic of being strapped to a table, and finally the sense of utter loss as the curtain is opened. (Murray 60) Sunil Dutta is a sergeant of the Los Angeles police department, expressed his own opinion about capital punishment, As a police officer, I often see the results of human depravity. I see incidents of such brutal behavior that my compassion dissolves like a candle flame swept by a tornado the practice of capital punishment, particularly by our justice system, reveals a serious failure in our humanity.
The Term Paper on The Death Penalty 3
... of States without the Death Penalty was 2. 8” (Introduction). Not only does the death penalty not deter crime but it is also very expensive. The death penalty costs ... California, Missouri, and Wyoming. The main source of execution for all states with the death penalty [with the exception of Nebraska is lethal injection. ...
We no longer burn witches or keep slaves or have monarchs dictate our lives. Capital punishment is similarly anachronistic. (Dutta 41) In addition to inhumanity, by providing death penalty- the society is playing as a god which is an immoral activity. Not only do the societies play the role of God by judging who will die and who will live, by supporting the death penalty we send out the dangerous message to impressionable minds that violence is a way to resolve problems. Secondly, capital punishment does not deter crime. It is not a deterrent because anyone that would be deterred by the death penalty would already have been deterred by life in prison, and people that are not deterred by that would not be stopped by any punishment.
This argument is typically supported by claims that those states which have implemented the death penalty recently have not had a reduction of violent crime. A stronger variant of this argument suggests that criminals who believe they will face the death penalty are more likely to use violence or murder to avoid capture, and that therefore the death penalty might theoretically even increase the rate of violent crime. January 17, 1997 on the 20th anniversary of the first execution in the United States, a University of Florida researchers study shows 90 percent of the nations top criminologists say killing people to deter violent crime is an immense waste of time and money (Hunter 125).
If somebody knew that if a person killed someone, the person would automatically be executed, they might choose not to kill. The fact is, it is not certain that all murderers will be executed. Some will be finding innocent, some sentences will be appealed, and some defendants will be found insane and not even go to jail.
The Term Paper on Death Penalty Murder In Disguise
Death Penalty: Murder in Disguise The American Heritage Dictionary defines capital punishment as "the penalty of death for the commission of crime." The death sentence has been applied since ancient times as punishment for crimes ranging from petty theft to murder. In 1976, U. S. states began creating a bifurcated trial procedure that would legally allow imposing the sentence of death. The states ...
The point is that right now murderers are not faced with the certainty of their deaths. In 1995, a total of 3,054 prisoners were sentenced to death, but of those only fifty-six were actually executed (Hunter 119).
It is hard to fear for death when there is a very small risk of actually dying. The death penalty does not deter murder because most murders are either “crimes of passion” or are planned by people who do not think they will be caught. Further, the system interferes with the international prosecution of criminals who commit serious crimes because countries which do not favor capital punishment in their own borders refuse to extradite criminals sought by the United States where there is a possibility of the death penalty if the fugitive is returned to this country. In addition to not being effective deterrent, the death penalty certainly does not give equal justice under the law. For it to be an effective deterrent, the death penalty must not be racially or economically biased.
The human cost of this racial injustice is incalculable. The decisions about who lives and who dies are being made along racial lines by a nearly all white group of prosecutors. The death penalty presents a stark symbol of the effects of racial discrimination. In may of 1994, the New York Times stated, A report to Congress in March found that of the 37 people whom the justice Department had sought to execute for drug-related murders since 1988, 33 of the 37 were black or Hispanic inmates, while three-fourths of those charged under this statute were white(Hunter 123).
A black murderer whose victim is white is the most likely to end up in the execution chamber, while a white murderer whose victim is black has the best chance of avoiding the executioner. Since the death penalty was restored in 1976, only six white people have been executed for murdering a black person, while 112 black people have been executed for murdering whites (Costanzo 174).
There are obviously signs of racism in the administration of the death penalty. It is very sad to see that this racism is still rooted in the society after all that has been done to get rid of it. The issue of class and economic status is also a big problem in death penalty cases. Probably the simplest way to escape the executioner is to be rich. Discrimination against the poor is especially blatant when it comes to deciding who lives and who dies. Although poor defendants on trial for murder are entitled to a lawyer, they are not necessarily entitled to a good lawyer.
The Essay on The Death Penalty 7
A number of people believe that the Death Penalty isnt necessary to deliver justice to the victims and their families, but on the other hand there are some who believe capitol punishment is primary to our justice system. In the United States capitol punishment is a controversy in of itself. On both sides there are people who pursue to validify there points like boxers proving their strength over ...
The poorly trained and poorly paid court-appointed lawyers usually represent poor defendants. In February of 1991, the New York Times reported, Most indigent defendants in capital cases are represented by inexperienced, ill-paid lawyers who do lackluster, routine work (Hunter 124).
No ….
