Catcher in the Rye
J.D. Salinger’s novel, The Catcher in the Rye, should long be remembered as
an American classic. Although some may not consider it one of the most
eloquently written stories of its time, it certainly captures the reader’s
attention. Salinger is able to incorporate philosophical views throughout the
story in terms of Holden’s ethical code; at the same time, he keeps the reader
entranced with radical turns of events and Holden’s character.
As far as ethics is concerned, Holden has his fair share of bad moral
judgments. He demonstrates a very negative principle when he decides, “…
I’d get the hell out of Pency-right that same night and all. I mean not wait till
Wednesday or anything. I just didn’t want to hang around any more” (51).
In this simple action, Holden gives himself away as a man of little reasoning.
He shows that he has no desire to have his life run by authority, so he packs
up his belongings and leaves at will. A second show of disagreeable morals
is presented in the form of Holden’s drinking habit, “I ordered a Scotch and
soda, which is my favorite drink, next to frozen Daiquiris” (85).
itself does not constitute moral corruption, yet drinking at Holden’s young
age, does. Holden turns to liquor as a scapegoat, and has failed to see the
... be of concern regarding laws that enforce widely held moral beliefs as is the case with murder, but ... laws still have the effect of enforcing widely held moral beliefs, even if it was not the ... . Mill is indeed making a moral claim about a moral question (the moral content of law) but he ... lawyers to substitute their views on highly contestable moral and social issues for those of the democratically ...
error in his ways. Although the prior two offenses are large, perhaps the most
obvious flaw in character for Holden was his intention to entertain a
prostitute, “I kept hoping she’d be good-looking. I didn’t care too much,
though. I sort of wanted to get it over with” (93).
Whereas drinking is
considered deviant only because of Holden’s young age, the purchase of a
prostitute at any age cannot be condoned. For whatever reason, Holden did
not use sound judgment in deciding to engage in the company of a harlot.
Obviously, Holden needs some ethical guidance, but perhaps not all is lost
Throughout the novel, Holden finds a way to redeem his own
understanding of right and wrong. Though his intentions might have leaned
toward corruption, his final decision reveals a basis for good principles; “I’ll
pay you and all, but do you mind very much if we don’t do it” (96)? By
rebuking Sunny, the call girl, Holden shows that he can distinguish right from
wrong. He was able to fall back on his ideals and make a sound judgment.
Once again Holden presents virtuous ethics when he encounters two nuns, “
‘I thought if you were taking up a collection, I could make a small
contribution’ ” (109).
Seemingly out of nowhere Holden shows a sign of
good heart. Without the slightest bit of hesitation, Holden dishes out ten
dollars and another act of moral good. Though throughout the story, he
seemed to have been well on his way out of New York, Holden makes a very
rational decision in saying “ ‘I’m not going away anywhere. I changed my
mind’ ” (207).
Holden could ultimately be counted on to make the right
choice. Discerning right from wrong must have taken a great deal out of him,
but Holden was able to do it. Salinger brought together all forms of reasoning
Character Makes the Man One of the questions Thomas Hardy poses in ... all-important idea Hardy wants to convey: that character indeed is fate. Throughout the reader s experience with Michael Henchard, one can ... the end, Henchard s character merely overshadowed the power of chance. Character indeed is fate, as most readers will pick up from this ...
Another way Salinger grabbed the readers attention’s was by keeping
them absorbed in the plot, as well as, Holden’s character. An example of
Holden’s crazy actions that was demonstrated well was his attempt to hit
Stradlater, “All I know is I got up form the bed, … and then I tried to sock
him, with all my might, right smack in the toothbrush, so it would split his
goddam throat open” (43).
Although it may seem cynical, this type of action
keeps readers entertained and interested in the story. Knowing how crazy
Holden can become urges readers to want to follow his progress. Another
character trait that attracts the reader is Holden’s capability to lie, “Then I
really started chucking the old crap around” (56).
Salinger’s attempt to add
humor to the plot with Holden’s frequent lying worked to perfection. Holden
contributes so much more to the story outline by intertwining lie after lie. To
compliment Holden’s character, are the radical twists and turns or the novel
itself, “ ‘Here’s my idea… we could drive up to Massachusetts and
Vermont…’ ” (132).
If only Holden acted out half of what he thought up, the
story would be an adventure series. The twists that the story takes because of
Holden’s ideas capture the reader, and subdues them into submission of their
mind to the author. Without Holden as the main character, or Salinger as the
author, the story would not be the success it is.
To say that Salinger was successful in writing a story would be
disrespecting him. Only by acknowledging how he was able to bring together
both philosophical views as well as entertain can justice truly be done.