though, he chose to continue on and he headed directly to Brundisium and the large number of troops. Octavius made his entrace into politics between April 44 and November 43 B.C. as a virtue of his adoption, as part of Roman custom. Octavius now assumed the name C. Julius Caesar Octavianus. He then just called himself ‘Caesar’, which came to represent his first major political reinvention. Brundisium troops joined Octavius’ cause and as he moved toward home his re- tinue grew in size.
In mid-April he was finally nearing Rome. Antony paid no attention to Octavius, perhaps dismissing the youth’s actions as some sort of side show. Toward the end of April, Octavius finally entered Rome but Antony continued to ignore him and even kept Octavius waiting during an arranged meeting in the gardens of Pompey. This exchange did not go well at all. Octavius moves to have his adoption officially recognized was blocked by Antony. He also prevented Octavius from standing for public office. As Octavius found favor with the crowd, the tensions with Antony grew.
As matters between these two came to a head, they finally exploded. They fought each other continuously and in the end Octavius came out on top. In 43 B.C. Octavius finally had the delayed ratifi- cation of his adoption, paid out the remainder of the legacy of Caesar, revoked amnesty for the Liberators and had them tried and convicted en masse and in absentee on a single day. Although this was a great feat for Octavius, it was far from over with Antony. Still to come would be the Triumvirate I, 43 -36 B.C. and shortly after would be the Triumvirate II also called the showdown with Antony, 36 – 30 B.C. In the end Octavian could not be defeated and he finally became Augustus, establishing a new order. January 13, 27 B.C., Octavian enters the senate and surrenders his position and retires to private life. This does not last very long before he returns to the battlefield and other duties he can be helpful in.
The Term Paper on The Relationship Between Mark Antony and Julius Caesar
Julius Caesar Commentary on the Relationship between Marc Antony and Julius Caesar Loyalty means faithfulness to one's friends, country, ideals, etc. What should one do when these loyalties conflict with one another? One would have to choose. A choice that can make or break a man, these choices broke many men in the play, Julius Caesar. One did not know who was friend or foe. Julius Caesar was a ...
Antonian went on to later kill himself and Augustus once again remained a super power and dominating figure especially in Rome. In my opinion Augustus was truly a great leader for what Rome was. He proved to be determined, brave, and also very committed. It was leaders like him that made a country strong and dominate. He defied the odds of his childhood and did the most with his life that he could. He made no excuses and never said, ‘I can’t’.
He simply sucked it up, and said, ‘Oh well’ and made it better the next time and that is what I call true leadership..