Censorship In Music
Censorship in music is a topic that has brought about much controversy in the past two
decades. There have been many different arguments on the topic, however the
question still remains as if it should be censored or it should not be censored.
Before you can form an opinion on this, you must hear both sides of the argument on
this much-debated topic. Some people believe that music should be censored so all
audiences can hear it without it containing any controversial lyrics. Others believe it
should not be censored and musical artists should be able to speak, sing, rap, or rhyme
freely without anyone censoring them.
“Whether a person finds a work obscene depends largely on his or her moral or religious
beliefs. These views change with each generation and further complicate the
censorship dilemma.” (Censorship by, Bradley Steffens page 97)
The quote above is very true. Religious or moral beliefs have a great influence on how a
person feels about censorship, and as generations pass on the common beliefs on it
may change. Right now, America is more uncensored than ever. However, things were
very different a few generations ago.
Some people believe music should be censored. They believe some of the language
musical artists use is vulgar, obscene, and crude. Also the fact that music is played on
medias such as radio and television, which are free to listen to by all audiences, and
The Term Paper on Banned and Censored Music
The discussion of whether or not the censorship of music is constitutionally sound has come about. This problem has been around since the beginning of music in one way or another. The fact of the matter is that there is technically no such thing as the censorship of music in the United States(Banned Music 1). Although that is supposedly the case, that statement can be very misleading. It is ...
there are many parents that would not wish for their kids to hear foul language. So on
radio and televison any controversial language is either silenced, edited out by a soft
sound, or some artists make two versions of their songs; one that is made for the
artist’s album, which is uncensored; and one for televsion and radio with any
controversial words change to be acceptable for all audiences. This does not include
cable television, which can be audited by parents since the parents must order and pay
for the channel to be viewed.
“Preventing or punishing speech is a clear violation of the First Amendment.”
(Censorship. Opposing Viewpoints by, Greehaven Press page 147).
This quote here is
the “battle cry” of many anti-censorship groups. When you really think about it, it is a
violation of the First Amendment, which says: “Congress shall make no law abridging
the freedom of speech or of the press”. The First Amendment guarantees the right to
freedom of speech, and censorship is violating peoples’ rights to say whatever they
want to say. It is sometimes difficult to understand when a child gets punished for
using foul language meanwhile the child’s parents have the right to critiscize and
petition the government whenever they feel the need to do so. Many musical artists
feel that when they are forced to change lyrics their rights are being violated. In some
artists’ songs they like to express their feelings towards somebody or something, and it
hurts them to be censored because the new words implemented are not from his or her
heart. They feel that they are being held down.
Due to the amendment made by our founding fathers I do not believe there will ever be
an answer to the question whether or not music should be censored. The way I see it,
it should not be censored. Many children often hear explicit language from older siblings
or parents at an early age. They believe that since someone they look up to uses those
The Essay on Bilingual Program: Children Language Development
This paper discussed on bilingual program that become one of the reasons parents choose schools for their children and its effect on children language development. As the impact of globalization English become a necessity for everyone in exploring and finding new things across the globe. Educational institutions see this as an opportunity to introduce bilingual program as a respond to the demand ...
words, they should too. Eventually, everyone will be exposed to language they do not
find acceptable. Foul language is not permitted on medias such as television or radio
because it is an all audience media. However, on albums the artist is allowed to use any
words he or she sees fit.
“The vexing question, of course, is, Who should decide what you read or view- the
church, the state or you?” (War of Words: The Censorship Debate by George Beahm
page xiii) In my opinion, the answer to that question is: you. Censorship on television
channels such as Nickelodeon , or PBS is understandable due to the fact that
mostly young children programming is broadcasted on those stations. However I find it
unnecessary to censor stations generally viewed by older audiences. It is now a
requirement by law for record companies to put stickers on tapes and compact discs
that say: “Parental Advisory. Explicit Lyrics”. The reason that law was passed was
because many angry mothers and fathers sued artists and/or record companies for
releasing albums that contained explicit lyrics, and now their child goes and repeats
their newly learned words to people such as their teachers, principals, and other friends
who then spread word around to their parents. I would tend to believe that many of
those parents used those same bad words in front of their children at one time or
another. They probably did not say it to their face, but the fact still remains that the
child heard his or her parents say those words, thus the child assumes it is normal to
say that word. Many parents also complain that the art on music albums’ covers and
insides. They argue saying that too is vulgar and should not be allowed.
I believe music should not be censored due to our First Amendment right. When a
parent hears foul language on their child’s stero or television, they should not complain
to the network or record company, they should complain to themselves. The
government is doing all they legally can to protect the childrens’ young ears from the
foul language that is out there. If a parent hears their child listening to foul language,
The Essay on Music Censorship 2
Music Censorship Music censorship has been an ongoing issue in the US for the last fifty years or so. In 1951 radio stations banned Dottie O’Brians “Four or Five Times” and Dean Martins “Wham Bam Thank You Ma’am” because they thought that they were suggestive. Also during the fifties and sixties attempts were mad to censor R&B music. In 1953 six counties in ...
they should not complain to anyone but themselves. If they do not wish for their child
to hear foul language they should have supervised their children more closely. If they
take their child to a record store and buy them a new tape or c.d., the parent should
have listened to the music by him or herself and scan for anything questionable. If they
don’t like the content, they can always return it to the store. This way they can be
positive that their child is listening to music that is acceptable in their eyes.
In conclusion, censorship in music is wrong in my opinion. Artists should be allowed to
say whatever they want. That is what our founding fathers based this country uopn:
freedom. The government is doing an excellent job in making the First Amendment
suitable for all. If parents have a problem with it, it is because they did not properly
supervise their children.
Bibliography
Beahm, George. War of Words, Ed. George Beahm. Kansas City, MO 1993
Greenhaven Press. Censorship. Opposing Viewpoints, Ed. Lisa Orr. San Diego, CA
Steffens, Bradley. Censorship. Ed. Lucent Books
