Lab report Heat of Reaction Introduction: The purpose of the lab was to through experiments calculate the heat of reaction and heat of formation, and see if we got a realistic result according to facts. We should see if Reaction 1 and 2 equalled 3 We created 3 reactions and then calculated their enthalpies. Work plan Substances: Material: Material: NaOH (s) 3 Beakers, 300 ml NaCl (aq) 0. 50 M Thermometer HCl (aq) 0.
25 M Balance Deionised water Work plan Since the lab was pretty time consuming we decided to Method: divide the lab into 2 lessons, one practical, where we should do all the actual lab-work, and one theoretical, were we should do all the calculations and evaluate our result. The laboratory part of the experiment takes place in 3 steps, or reactions. Reaction 1: We began by weighing a dry beaker. Then we filled it with 200 ml-deionised water, and recorded the temperature of the fluid.
After that was done we hydrated the water by adding 2. 027 grams of NaOH (s).
We mixed it thoroughly with the water, and as it reacted the temperature rose. We recorded the highest temperature. (See Calculations).
Reaction 2: We began in the same way as in reaction 1, by weighing the beaker, but instead of using deionised water we used 100 ml of 0.
25 M HCl (aq), and recorded it! s temperature. After that we added 0. 993 grams of NaOH (s).
The temperature rose and we recorded the highest temperature. Reaction 3: We weighed the 300 ml beaker and added 50 ml of 0.
The Term Paper on Boiling Tube Reaction Temperature Solution
PLANNING Investigating the Kinetics of the reaction between Iodide ions and Peroxodisulphate (VI) ions By the use of an Iodine clock reaction I hope to obtain the length of time taken for Iodine ions (in potassium iodide) to react fully with Peroxodisulphate ions (in potassium Peroxodisulphate). I will do three sets of experiments changing first the concentration of iodide ions, then the ...
50 M HCl (aq) to it, and recorded the temperature. After that we added 50 ml of 0. 50 M NaOH (aq).
The temperature rose, and we recorded the highest temperature. Calculations: Reaction 1: NaOH (s) “Na+ (aq) + OH- (aq) m (beaker): 138.
381 g. m (NaOH): 2. 027 g. = 0. 0506669693 moles V: 200 ml of water. c (beaker): 0.
2 x 4. 19 J/g c (water): 4. 19 J/g T 1: 20. 9! ~a T 2: 22.
7! ~a |T = T 1 – T 2 = 1. 8! ~a To find the enthalpy we have to use the equation: V x c (water) x |T, which equals the enthalpy in Joules. I put in my values (see above) in the equation: V x c (water) x |T = 200 x 4. 19 x 1. 8 = 1508. 4 J This is only the heat taken up by the water.
Of course the beaker will take up some heat too. To find this we have to use this equation: c (beaker) x m (beaker) x |T, this too, equals the enthalpy in joules. I put in my values in the equation: (0. 2 x 4. 19) x 138. 381 x 1.
8 = 208. 7339004 J To get the total heat of reaction I have to plus these values together like this: 1508. 4 + 208. 7339004 = 1717. 1339 J Since this heat is released, the |H is negative. |H is in this case -1717.
1339 J. Reaction 2: NaOH (s) + H+ (aq) + Cl- (aq) ” Na+ (aq) + Cl- (aq) + H 2 O m (beaker): 137. 702 g. m (NaOH): 0. 993 g. = 0.
0248210659 moles. V: 100 ml of 0. 25 M HCl (aq) c (beaker): 0. 2 x 4. 19 J/g c (HCl (aq) ): 4. 19 J/g T 1: 20.
9! ~a T 2: 25. 0! ~a |T = T 1 – T 2 = 4. 1! ~a To find the enthalpy for this reaction, I just do the same as I did in reaction 1. Total equation: (V x c (HCl (aq) ) x |T) + (c (beaker) x m (beaker) x |T) I put in my values: (100 x 4.
19 x 4. 1) + (0. 2 x 4. 19 x 137.
702 x 4. 1) = (1717. 9) + (473. 1165316) = 2191. 016532 J Just as in reaction 1, heat is released. |H is therefore negative.
|H = – 2191. 016532 J Reaction 3: Na+ (aq) + OH- (aq) + H+ (aq) + Cl- (aq) ” Na+ (aq) +Cl- (aq) + H 2 O m (beaker): 141. 304 g. V (NaOH): 50 ml, 0. 5 M V (HCl): 50 ml, 0. 5 M V total 100 ml c (beaker): 0.
The Term Paper on Formal Report – Kinetics Of Reaction: The Iodine Clock Reaction
In everyday life, several reactions are encountered, but still knowledge on how fast these occur and the factors affecting it were still insufficient. This study aimed to determine the different factors affecting the rate of reaction and how these factors affected it. An experiment named iodine clock reaction was done to answer the questions raised. In this study the reaction of iodide ion and ...
2 x 4. 19 J/g c (NaOH+HCl): 4. 19 J/g T 1: 20. 8 T 2: 23. 9 |T = T 1 – T 2 = 3. 1! ~a I do the same as in reaction 1 and 2.
Total equation: (V x c (NaOH+HCl) x |T) + (c (beaker) x m (beaker) x |T) I put in my values: (100 x 4. 19 x 3. 1) + (0. 2 x 4. 19 x 141. 304 x 3.
1) = (1298. 9) + (367. 0795312) = 1665. 979531 J Just like reaction 1 and 2, does reaction 3 release heat, and its |H is therefore negative. |H = – 1665. 979531 J Calculating the heat of formation: The heat of formation is the heat of reaction divided by the number of moles we used, or the enthalpy change when one mole of a compound is formed from its element.
In reaction 1 we used 0. 0506669693 moles of NaOH The heat of reaction in this experiment was -1717. 1339 J To convert this into heat of formation we need to divide it by the number of moles of NaOH used, like this: -1717. 1339/0. 0506669693 = – 33890. 59823 J = – 33.
8906 kJ In reaction 2 we used 0. 0248210659 moles of NaOH. Since we used the sodium hydroxide to neutralize the hydrochloric acid, it! s not certain that this is the number of moles used in the reaction. We need to determine which substance is the limiting one. To do this I need to calculate the number of HCl moles in the hydrochloric acid. n = c x v I put in my values n = 0.
25 x 0. 1 = 0. 025 moles There is about 0. 025 moles of each substance, but we have a little more of the hydrochloric acid, which means that NaOH is the limiting substance and the substance we should use for the calculation. To calculate the heat of formation, I! ll do the same as I did for the first reaction. – 2191.
016532 / 0. 0248210659 = – 88272. 45954 J = – 88. 27245954 kJ In reaction 3 the is the same number of moles of both of the substances.
n = c x v I put in my values for reaction 3 n = 0. 50 x 0. 05 = 0. 025 moles To get the heat of formation I divide the heat of reaction with the number of moles. 1665. 979531 / 0.
025 = 66639. 18125 J = 66. 63918125 kJ To get the equation which we were to use to check the correctness we had to reverse reaction number one and add it to number two so 2 “C 1 = 3 To see if my answers are correct, I check them in this way: To get the total heat of formation you have to take reaction 2 (- 87. 6 kJ) minus reaction 1 (- 33. 9 kJ) equals reaction 3, like this: |H 2 – |H 1 = |H 3 – 88. 27245954 “C (- 33.
The Essay on What Is A Chemical Reaction?
Tell which of the following are chemical changes: (a) fermenting sugar, (b) winding a clock spring, (c) burning wood, (d) evaporating ether, (e) cooking meat, (f) dissolving sugar, (g) mixing sand and salt, and (h) rusting iron. When a chemical change occurs it changes the chemical composition of the original substances and through bonding form a new substance. Fermenting sugar, burning wood, ...
89059823) = – 54. 38186131 kJ The answer should be equal to “C 66. 63916 kJ. This means that we are about 12.
3 kJ away from real answer. Discussion: I think our result is acceptable, but pretty far from accurate. I think that when perform a lab like this, there are many different sources of errors, which are hard to eliminate. Heat will always be lost to the surroundings for example.
Something that I think we could maybe have done better job at recording the starting temperature. We just left the thermometer in for about one minute. Maybe we should have left it there longer and we might have gotten an even better result. But at least we used a digital one, instead of a normal one, that must have given us a better result. Other than that, I can! t really think of anything we could have done wrong, or something that we could have done in a better way. Could there be any errors in the calculations? The specific heat content of water is 4.
19 J/g. We where supposed to use the same value for the hydrochloric acid, but is that really 100 % correct? It there a better value you could use to get a better result? I don! t think this is a really important lab, I don! t think this is something that you do very often since heat of formation is so well documented in books. But the lab really helped me to understand the different between heat of reaction and heat of formation, and how to calculate these.