John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau were the founding fathers of the psychology of children. Locke was an environmentalist, while Rousseau was a naturalist. They had opposing viewpoints. They both believed in different things when it came to developing minds of children. John Locke was an environmentalist. He believed a child’s mind develops largely on the environment accordance with his / her experience of the world, and through learning.
He brings forth the concept of tabula rasa, or blank slate; this blank slate is a child’s mind that eventually fills up with learning and experience. According to Locke, there are four things of environment that mold a child’s mind. The first is associations. This is where one thought is usually associated with another – for example, when a child is placed in a crib he may start crying, because being in the crib would be mean that he couldn’t be with his mother.
The second one is repetition. These are habitual practices that we do over and over – to the point where, if we don’t do it, things will seem out of place. The third is imitation. Children often like to imitate others, like repeating the same utterance their caregiver may have recently said. Or, for example, if child A starts playing with an aggressive child B, child A might end up becoming more aggressive as well. This is through influence and modeling.
The fourth is rewards and punishment. For example, a child may yearn to receive good grades because this would gain approval and praise from their parents. A child may not want bad grades, because this would end in disappointment of the parents. These views held by Locke are of the behavioral / environmentalist perspective. Jean Jacques Rousseau, on the other hand, was a naturalist.
The Essay on Is An Open Mind A Good Thing
Is an open mind a good thing It is fashionable today to have an "open mind" and to subscribe to pluralist theories. It is no longer acceptable to have and defend your own viewpoint. They tell us that every culture and every opinion and every idea has merit in and of itself and that no one has the right to argue that. They tell us that if we impose our own ideas and culture and viewpoints upon ...
He agreed with Locke in that children are quite different from adults. However, he did not believe they were like blank sheets of paper waiting to be written on. Instead, he believed that children have a unique, natural way in which their mind develops. He believed that there should be placed more emphasis on natural development, rather than a parent trying to mold their child in a “correct” way for example. Rousseau argues that children should learn on their own. The healthiest development was not societal influence, but nature.
According to Rousseau, there are 4 states of development: infancy (neonate-2 years old), childhood (2-12), late childhood (12-15), and adolescence. Throughout these stages, things happen naturally. For example, in adolescence, a teenager may begin to be aware of their sexuality. Or, for example, in infancy; almost everything goes in the mouth and the child begins to familiarize its surroundings through this. Rousseau and Locke’s theories of child development were quite different from each other. Whereas Locke believed that society had tremendous influence on a child’s development, Rousseau was against this and believed that nature contributed to child development..
