A Critical Interpretation of Hans Kung’s Historical Analysis of the Development of the Hierarchical Church The beginnings of the Christian church are shrouded in mystery. With the lack of evidence about that time in history, it is hard to draw conclusions of any type. However, the historical analyst, Hans Kung, has written a book to shed some light on the subject. In this book, Kung discusses his opinion on the development of the early church, and its hierarchical structure. In the following paper, I will address two of the chapters of Kung’s book, “The Beginnings of the Early Church” and “The Early Catholic Church.” The points that I will focus on are: The makeup and persecution of the early church community and why it was that way, and how, according to Kung, the founders of Catholicism went against how Jesus wanted the church to be governed by establishing a hierarchy. The Christian church, according to Kung, began at Pentecost.
When the Holy Spirit came to the apostles and told them to go out and preach the teachings of Jesus it meant that the apostles could claim an identity separate from Judaism. The majority of the first Christians were Jews from Jerusalem that believed that Jesus was the Messiah promised to the Jews in the Hebrew Testament and they believed in the resurrection. “The earliest Christian community did not want in any way to part company with the Jewish community or nation, but to remain integrated into Judaism.” (P. 13).
The Essay on Confirmation: Early Christian Community
For people in the Early Christian Community who wanted to commit themselves as followers of Christ they first needed to receive the sacraments of initiation. Initiation into the Church took place in a single ceremony, which normally unfolded during the Easter Vigil service. In the early church, the three Sacraments of initiation—Baptism, Confirmation, and Eucharist—were celebrated in the same ...
The differences in the beliefs of the Jews and the Jewish-Christians naturally created a separation in the two groups. When the Christian disciples started going out and preaching their faith to people, the Roman Empire saw them as a threat to their power and decided that Christianity would have to be stopped. Because Christianity and Judaism were one, the two most effective ways to persecute the Christians was to execute their leaders, and to destroy the Jewish places of worship. After the Romans burned the Temple of Jerusalem for the second time, a council of Pharisees decided that the Christians were to be excommunicated from the Jewish temple.
If not for the early connection to the Jewish faith, the Christian religion would never have established as a major religion. The idea of having one God, called monotheism, was too radical at the time to attract people to it, especially during the Roman Empire when the Caesar was considered the God of the people and there were many gods, called polytheism, for every aspect of life. Thus, Roman persecutions, which inevitably came, were delayed because of the makeup of the community that made up the early Christian faith. The vast majority of the first Christians were “the poor, the oppressed, the wretched, the desperate, those who were discriminated against and outcast” (P.
12), so the Romans thought that they were not a threat until the numbers of Christians grew too large to ignore. By the time the persecutions began, the voice of Christianity had spread itself to all the ends of the Roman Empire. Christianity was no longer a small group of Jews with radical beliefs, Gentiles from all of the different countries had converted to Christianity and thereby bolstered the numbers of the Christians. The Roman persecutions, in the end, strengthened the Christian faith more than anything else could have, and therefore gave Christians a sense of religious identity. Only because the leaders of Christianity stood firm and outlasted the persecutions did Christianity spread so quickly throughout Europe and eventually gain the title of “The Great Church” (P. 27).
How, then was the “Great Church” going to be led? According to Kung, Jesus did not want the Christian church to be led by one person, or a small group of persons; rather, “Jesus radiated a democratic spirit in the best sense of the word. This was matched by a people of those who are free (no dominating institution, even a Grand Inquisition) and in principle equal (not a church characterized by class, caste, race, or office) ” (P. 7).
The Essay on The Christian Church
... Jewish faith directly aided Christianity to commence and develop. A clearer understanding of the Roman, Greek, and Jewish contributions to the Christian Church allows ... call themselves Christians yet, Jesus’ followers founded the beginning of the Church. Jesus used modified and logically understood Jewish scriptures to inform the people of ...
In the situation of the early church, the democratic spirit would have led to the demise of the Christian church before it even started.
Jesus must have had his ideas of how he thought the Church should be run. He demonstrated this when he named Peter “The Rock.” According to Kung, “the original community already clearly had a hierarchical structure, with apostles as pillars and Peter as a rock” (P. 7).
The establishment of a hierarchy within the early church could have been a temporary thing, once the church had enough followers to look after itself, it could have reverted to Jesus’s ystem of “democracy.” The Church, instead, did not change its governing techniques. After the Apostles, there were bishops, and then the hierarchy took over from there. As it is today, there are special offices of privilege, affluence, and prestige that make up the governing body of the Christian church.
The offices of Pope, Cardinal, Bishop, Priest and Deacon are all offices that are part of a complicated hierarchical structure that control the orthodoxy of the Christian teachings. If one of the goals of Christianity is to demonstrate living the way that Jesus would have, or ortho praxis, then the Church hierarchy should reconsider some of the laws in regard to the people that are allowed into positions of influence. The people that Jesus spent the majority of his time with were not the rich and powerful people of the Jewish community, it was exactly the opposite, Jesus spent his time with the poorest of the poor, the prostitutes, the unclean, women and children, and criminals. Jesus encouraged everyone to be involved in their own faith life, to preach the Kingdom of God to others. I think that the fact that the current Christian faith does not allow women into priesthood is something that Jesus would whole-heartedly disagree with. As it is now, I believe that the Christian hierarchy is extremely hypocritical in the way that they approach the “right” way to live.
The Essay on The Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter Day Saints
Many people have varying ideas about The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. It has been said that the Mormons are a cult out to destroy the beliefs of the other Christian churches. Some believe that they are not a true Christian church, that they hide their beliefs from investigators of their religion, and they keep important details of their religion secret until after you have become a ...
In the Old Testament, in the Gospels, and in all the teachings of the Christian faith, people are cautioned against materialism and to donate of all their material goods to the poor so that they can concentrate on the more important things in life. Currently, all of the positions of power in the Christian hierarchy are very prestigious and well-off positions to be in. If the church officials truly wanted to emulate the way that Jesus told his disciples to live, then the members of the church’s’ hierarchy would be living in homeless shelters tending to the needy, and they would be preaching in the same robes that they wore all the time, they would not be extravagant in the way they dressed or appeared in public. If anything, today’s church officials are more like Pharisees than anything in the way that they do not practice what they are telling others to, they merely say that so that they may fulfill the teaching aspect of their vocation. I believe that if the hierarchy truly believed in what they thought, there would be no extravagance in the lives of the church officials. Likewise, if the church truly believed in what Jesus taught, they would not be shunning the participation of women in the church; rather, they would be embracing all the people that truly wished to participate in the vocation of a priest or any position in the church for that matter.
In conclusion, the early Christian church had its problems in who was accepted into the new faith and why they were persecuted for it. This was because, during the height of the Roman Empire, any group of people that could be dangerous to Roman ideology would not be tolerated, and the Romans would attempt to put a stop to it. These persecutions of the Christians, however, strengthened, not weakened the Christian church to a point that there would be no way to disperse the community of believers. The main reason that the church stayed together like it did was because of the early establishment of a hierarchy, which, while Kung speculates, would not be the way that Jesus would have wanted the church to be governed, worked in establishing the Christian community into a world religion.
