Philosophers, historians, authors, and politicians have spent centuries pondering the relationship between citizens and their government. It is a question that has as many considerations as there are forms of government and it is rarely answered satisfactorily. A relatively modern theorist, author Henry Thoreau, introduced an idea of man as an individual, rather than a subject, by thoroughly describing the way a citizen should live many of his works. He indirectly supplements the arguments he presents in his essay Civil Disobedience through a comprehensive selection of adages found in his other works. In particular, the phrases “A simple and independent mind does not toil at the bidding of any prince” and “To be awake is to be alive. I have never met a man who is quite awake” support many of the arguments in Civil Disobedience because they help to explicate the complex ideas Thoreau presents.
The phrase “A simple and independent mind does not toil at the bidding of any prince” regards the responsibilities of a man to his own consciousness it is a duty that can not be revoked by any form of tyrant. Rather than hinting at a type of anarchy, this statement merely describes each mans duty to performing justice in all his actions. This does not refer to any “mans duty to devote himself to the eradication of any, even the most enormous wrong; he may still properly have other concerns to engage him; but it is his duty, at least, to wash his hands of it, and, if he gives it no thought longer, not to give it practically his support” (681).
The Term Paper on Humanity In One Man Duty Person
... to a man's duty, namely, his duty regarding these animals; but directly considered, such a duty is always only his duty to himself. Concerning Man's Duty to ... of beautiful though lifeless things in nature is contrary to man's duty to himself. For such a propensity weakens or destroys ... what proportions, in comparison with one another, it may be man's duty to himself to make them his aim, are matters ...
The term “simple” does not refer to an underdeveloped sense of morality; it describes a state of mind in which the concept of justice is so defined that contradictions cannot exist.
To toil, as it is presented in this quotation means to sacrifice ideals for the sake of conformity or law. The only real power the State holds over any individual is the promise of brute force; it “never intentionally confronts a mans sense, intellectual or moral, but only his body, his senses” (687).
Therefore, many acts the State requires will be unjust they can and will force a man to slave for the sake of an ordeal he does not believe in. As Thoreau notes in Civil Disobedience, “a wise man will only be useful as a man” (678).
In essence, Thoreau believes that a man who toils at any ruling institutions bidding simply because it bid him to do so sacrifices his own facilities as a human being. He then becomes nothing more than a man put “on a level with wood and earth and stones Command[ing] no more respect than men of straw, or a lump of dirt” (678).
Another quotation that helps to explicate Thoreau Civil Disobedience is “To be awake is to be alive. I have never yet met a man who was quite awake.” In this phrase, Thoreau uses the term “awake” as an euphemism for being fully aware of ones concept of right and fully in control of ones moral and physical existence. Understandably, people who are consistently awake, in this sense of the word, are hard to find: “There are nine hundred and ninety-nine patrons of virtue to one virtuous man” (680).
Also, the fact that Thoreau has “never met a man who was quite awake” implies that fully conscious individuals have difficulty existing in modern society. In fact, Thoreau believes that “no man with a genius for legislation has appeared in America. They are rare in the history of the world” (692).
Perhaps, by the word “awake,” and its equation with “alive,” Thoreau is also referring to the ability to fulfill his own mission: “I came into this world, not chiefly to make this a good place to live in, but to live in it, be it good or bad” (683).
The Essay on Thoreau Vs King Civil Reader Men
Civil disobedience, standing up for what you believe in, and willingly being able to suffer the consequences for that cause are ideas that both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. hold dearly and express persuasively in their respectable pieces, Civil Disobedience, and Letter From Birmingham Jail. Although the two stylistically coincide in many elements, the have their share of ...
Although this concept is not a particularly unique one, it is nearly impossible to fulfill completely but to fulfill it partially is useless. As a living being, one must “cast your whole vote, not a strip of paper merely, but your whole influence” (684).
To truly be alive, one must be consciously satisfied with every passing moment.
Through his conscientious support of every facet of his philosophy, Thoreau effectively proves his statements regarding citizenship and government. He remains consistent to nearly every idea he presents and therefore surrounds them with a seriousness that cannot be ignored. Thoreau, Henry. “Civil Disobedience.” Elements of Argument: A text and Reader. Ed.
Annette T. Rothenberg. 6 th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2000. 463-466..
