Cloning: Why we shouldn’t be against it
Essay submitted by Marina
You have been told that you are unique. The belief that there is no one else like you in
the whole world made you feel special and proud. This belief may not be true in the
future.
The world was stunned by the news in late February 1997 that a British embryologist
named Ian Wilmut and his research team had successfully cloned a lamb named Dolly
from an adult sheep. Dolly was created by replacing the DNA of one sheep’s egg with
the DNA of another sheep’s udder. While plants and lower forms of animal life have been
successfully cloned for many years now, before Wilmut’s announcement it had been
thought by many to be unlikely that such a procedure could be performed on higher
mammals. The world media was immediately filled with heated discussions about the
ethical implications of cloning.
Some of the most powerful people in the world have felt compelled to act against this
threat. President Clinton swiftly imposed a ban on federal funding for human-cloning
research. Bills are in the works in both houses of Congress to outlaw human cloning
which it taken to be a fundamentally evil thing that must be stopped. But what is
exactly bad about it? From an ethical point of view , it is difficult to see exactly what is
wrong with cloning human beings. The people who are afraid of cloning tend to think
The Term Paper on Debate Of Human Cloning
Debate of human cloning In the past several decades, human cloning has turned from a laboratory dream to worldwide disputes. There are enough opinions supporting both bad and good consequences of human cloning. Human cloning sets a number of difficult questions about human independence, self-esteem, and individuality. Will human cloning be a huge step for man, or will it result in moral demise? ...
that someone will break into Napoleon’s Tomb, steal some DNA and make 2000
emperors. In reality, cloning would be probably used by infertile people who now use
donated sperm, eggs, or embryos. Do the potential harms outweigh the potential
benefits of cloning? From what we know now, they don’t. Therefore, we should not
rush to ban a potentially useful method of helping infertile, genetically at-risk, or single
people to become parents.
We can start by asking whether human beings have a right to reproduce. I say ” Yes”. I
have no moral right to tell other people they shouldn’t be able to have children, and I
don’t see that Bill Clinton has that right either. If humans have a right to reproduce,
what right does society have to limit the means? Essentially all reproduction is done
these days with medical help- at delivery, and even before. Truly natural human
reproduction would make pregnancy-related death the number.1 killer of adult women.
OF course, some forms of medical help are more invasive than others. With in vitro
fertilization, the sperm and egg are combined in the lab and surgically implanted in the
womb. Less than two decades ago, a similar concern was raised over the ethical issues
involved in ” test-tube babies”. Today, nearly 30,000 such babies have been born in the
United States alone. Many parents have been made happy. So what low or principle
says that one combination of genetic material in a flask is Ok, but another is not?
Nature clones people all the time, and rather frequently. Approximately 1 in 1000 birth
is of identical twins. However, despite how many or how few individual characteristics
twins have in common, they are different people. They have their own identities, their
own thoughts, and their own rights. They enter different occupations, get different
diseases, have different experiences with marriage, alcohol, community leadership, and
etc. They have different souls as would cloned individuals. Even if somebody did clone
2,000 Napoleons, they would be even more different from their parents than twins are
The Essay on Human Cloning Child People Clone
... In the future, we can clone people the similar way they cloned Dolly. To do so, human cloning should not be banned for ... a person because any cell would do. One parent contributes DNA, making the child almost an identical twin. He or she would ... to 20% chances to be conceived with a baby. If that embryo could be cloned and turned into three or four, the ...
from each other because the cloned child would be raised in a different historical
period. The argument that cloning robs individuals of their individuality therefore doesn’t
hold.
Perhaps the strongest ethical argument against cloning is that it could lead to a new ,
unfamiliar type of family relationship. We have no idea what it would be like to grow up
as the child of a parent who seems to know you from inside. Some psychological
characteristics may be biologically based and the parent will know in advance what
crises a cloned teenager will go through and how he or she will respond. It may produce
a good and loving relationship, because the parent may understand, to greater degree
than most parents, what the child is going through. ON the other hand, most children
want to have their own space. Still, just because a family relationship is new and
untried, is not a reason to condemn it automatically. IN the past . ,many types of
family relationships were considered harmful but later showed to cause no harm to the
children. Among these are joint custody after divorce, gay and lesbian parenting, and
interracial adoption. As with adoption, in-vitro fertilization, and use of donor sperm,
how the child will react to the news about his /her arrival in the world will depend to a
large extent on how the parents themselves feel about this mode of reproduction.
Parents and children may adjust to cloning far more easily than we might think, just as
it happened with in-vitro fertilization.
One recurring image in anti-cloning propaganda is of some evil dictator raising an army
of cloned warriors. But who is going to raise such an army. Clones start out life as
babies. It is much easier to recruit young adults than to take care of babies for 20
years. Remember that cloning isn’t the same as genetic engineering. We can’t make
supermen-we have to find him first and his bravery might- or might not – be genetically
determined.
Some of you might think that cloning is playing God. However, can you really say that
you know God’s intentions. There is substantial disagreement as to what is God’ s will.
The Research paper on Child Parent Conflict and Academic Performance
Education and family plays a major role in the psychological development of a child. Parent- child relationships are unique, but vary in complexity (Barber, 1994); however, the universal element among all relationships is conflict. Child-parent conflict is defined as a struggle, or trial of strength between a child (defined in my research paper as an individual under the age of 18) and their ...
But what I find interesting in this argument is something I read in article “Cloning: Will
They Soon Clone Human Beings?” by Garner Ted Armstrong who wrote: ” Anyone who
has truly proved God exists; that God isn’t only Creator, but Lifegiver, Designer,
Sustainer, and Ruler over all his creation, knows that the human family began with one
man, and that a wife, miraculously created form his own body and as unique and
original a creation as Adam himself, formed the first family. Though God’s miraculous
creation of Eve was far from cloning, it is interesting to note in passing that God’s own
Word says He used Adam’s rib-physical bone and tissue – to create Eve.”
Another argument against cloning is that it would be available only to the wealthy and
therefore would increase social inequality. What else is new? This is the story of
American health care. We need a better health care system, no a ban on new
technologies.
To summarize, human cloning and cloning research shouldn’t be made illegal by the U.S.
Federal Government because it may provide a way for completely sterile individuals to
reproduce, it may provide a way for homosexual couples to reproduce themselves, it
probably will provide a valuable basic research and possible spin off technologies related
to reproduction and development, our society has respected general right to control
ones body in regard to reproduction, and finally prohibiting it would violate the
fundamental freedom of scientific inquiring.
Will human cloning be done? Undoubtedly. The technique used in sheep cloning does
not require a highly sophisticated laboratory. Since the United States government
doesn’t support research on the human cloning, and the United Kingdom, France , and
The Term Paper on Cloning Research Human Money
... ideas are far fetch and misunderstood. Human Cloning is inevitable. The United States cannot stop cloning research and development, so they must have ... people talk about human cloning that tend to be negative. Most reaction is people shouldn't play god or interfere with ... funding provided through federal money this technology could be in our near future. Some scientists believe that cloning cells ...
Germany have banned cloning, the research making cloning possible may take place in
Asia, Eastern Europe, or the Near East. Much of it may take place in secret, and it will
occur regardless of any United States policy. According to the ….. approximately 80
% of Americans feel that cloning is wrong. However, the vast majority of people,
including those who rail against cloning research , owe their very lives to previous
medical discoveries. Don’t let the forces of ignorance and fear turn us back from the
research, and at this point, do not worry about Napolion’s Tomb . Only living cells can
be cloned.
