Although cloning experts claim that their work would help infertile couples, the experience with animal cloning has shown that scientifically, the experiment generates ethical concerns just as it is still replete with a lot of risks for the offspring. There are reasonable grounds that urge caution about this new advance in genetic engineering without being techno-phobic. (3) Already human cloning violates existing laws in some countries while in some other countries such as United Kingdom where human cloning is not yet banned legally, the government is contemplating legislating against it for reproductive purposes. Cloning for therapeutic reasons is allowed in UK on a limited scale. The outrage against human cloning is some places are such that in Italy the medical authorities are considering withdrawing Dr. Anthinori’s license if he insists on the practice. (3) In an Illinois Republican’s judgment, “It is critical that both state and federal lawmakers look carefully at upcoming legislation to ban cloning to ensure that scientific advances which may sure fatal diseases are protected.
(2) Congressmen observes, that no one really knows what discoveries might yet be made in treating debilitating diseases as the human cloning issue is aired and determined by congress. (2) Florida introduced the banning of cloning, but then quickly withdrew because it would have banned cloning of humans and the cloning of DNA. Many do not want cloning to be totally banned because it is important to innovative scientific research, which may spin off from the cloning technique. (2) Cloning for ultimate medical purposes should be contained to animals and agriculture, and not be extended to humans. Congress takes attention to carefully and cautiously takes part in crafting cloning legislation that precludes cloning humans. (2) President Clinton and a number of congressional members already have nixed human cloning.
The Essay on Sheep Cloning Human Ban Experiments
... act refer to The Gene Letter. Opponents to Human Cloning Ban Discussion in the Senate h Within the Senate, ... Advanced Cell Technology Incorporated, share other scientists' concerns that human cloning bans will affect their research in "p harming" (pharmaceuticals ... also stated it was considering a human cloning ban Australia. ) h Canada proposed the "Human Reproductive and Genetic Technologies Act" ...
“No longer can it be done, but should it be done? Are there potential outcomes for medicines that are worth exploring? What role, if any should the government play in regulating this new technology.” (2) Beyond ethical considerations, there are legitimate scientific grounds to urge caution in the practice of cloning. Cloning is still largely underdeveloped and honest scientists say the mechanisms of bringing about the clone are not fully understood yet. (3) Cloning by some if thought of as destructive. In which scientists clone a human embryo not to breed a baby, but to manufacture and extract certain human cells that can then be used in research and in life-saving and elective surgeries. (1).
