Introduction Their [Russias and Americas] starting-point is different, and their courses are not the same; yet each of them seems marked by the will of Heaven to sway the destinies of half the globe, Alexis de Torqueville, late 19th century. De Torquevilles prophecy came true by the 1940s when the two super powers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, had come head to head, swaying the destinies of half the globe and more. (de Torqueville, chapter 18) The United States had recently participated in the second World War resulting in an Allied and American victory. Europe, however, was devastated, economically, politically, and socially. The United States [stood] at this time at the pinnacle of world power. It [was] a solemn moment for American democracy, former Britain Prime Minister Winston Churchill stated in a speech delivered at Westminster College in 1946. (Churchill, page 1) At that time, American and Russian tensions had evolved into a full-throttle push into the Cold War.
The Cold War refers to the tensions that arose between Russia and America that became a strategic and political struggle that developed after World War II. It lasted for 35 years and it was the battle that determined the fate of democracy and communism. The never-back down attitudes pushed into a stand-off between the two super powers. (Cold War: The Cause, par 1) To intensify to the hostility, the Soviet Union had taken a policy that shutting out any other nations from the Unions internal affairs metaphorically known as the Iron Curtain. What emerged was a war that entailed much greater activism and a correspondingly larger commitment of resources to foreign policy than the United States had previously undertaken in peacetime. (Ford, page 1) The United States was asked to form policies in to deal with its doppelganger’s atomic power and communistic government.
The Term Paper on Welfare State: An Introduction To Social Policy
Modern welfare state development is generally considered to lead to social security or benefits payments, social housing provision, health provision, social work and educational services. Together these services are known as the ‘big five’ but these services tend to develop over time and have differed in quantity, availability and quality. Provision and development can change due to ...
The Cold War significantly changed the way foreign policy is administered today. The United States was forced to make strategic plans to help other countries regain economic stability, contain communism, and not end up in a ruinous global nuclear war. The war was what pushed America from the Monroe Doctrines limited jurisdiction to Truman’s National Security Council’s reponse to the endangering communsim and warfare with NSC 68, Containment’s and the Marshall Plans economic intervention in volatile nations, and Dulles’ “brinkmanship.” Three policies and two ideologies formed the backbone to what became the outline for foreign policy in America through the Cold War era and eventually setting a exemplar reflected in present politics. Today, many of the policies shaped in the wake of the Cold War are applicable to Americas attitude toward and intervention in other nations. Secretary of State John Foster Dulles (1954), leader of State Departments Foreign Services George Kennan, and other political figures had created a precedent in American history. The Competing Ideology of America In the proceedings and height of the Cold War, the American approach to the Soviet Union was an unsteady one. Realism and moralism took center stage in the debates of policy and are present in todays policies. Realists envisioned the United States to be motivated by consistent and well-defined national interests, whereas moralists wanted the nations values to reside in democracy, human rights, tolerance, and so forth. (Spanier, page 293) Realists had the upper hand in controlling the United States foreign policy in the Cold War era. However it was the fusion of the two ideas that truly formed the blue print for that troubled era and for today.
The Essay on Epochal War State Nation States
Still riding the Trojan horse The Shield of Achilles: War, Law and the Course of History by Philip Bobbitt 960 pp, Allen Lane This is a book of extraordinary ambition. It could well have been called A General Theory of War, Peace and History. For that is what it proffers, at least for political history over the last half-millennium as perceived through European and American eyes. And it has a ...
NSC 68 The Marshall Plan. Secretary of State George C. Marshall delivered a speech at Harvard University in 1947 that laid the foundations for what was to become the Marshall Plan. The Marshall Plan was the response to the faltering economies in Western Europe. It provided economic assistance to all European nations that would agree to United States to intervention. This plan was based upon Moralism ideology.
George Kennan was a large proponent of the Marshall Plan. He supported it because he believed that the pressure of poor economies make nations turn to communism as an answer. (Containment through Economics, par10) He was correct. The Marshall Plan was not only effective in maintaining good trade but it also undermined the spread of communism. Within years of the plans establishment communism in the countries that agreed to the intervention had declined and American trade thrived. (Brinkley, page 972) Containment. President Truman was a proponent of military aid to the satellite nations of the Soviet Union and thus containing the communist threat. The fusion of Kennans proposal, in similarity to the Marshall Plan, and Trumans plan was at the heart of the theory of containment.
Containment was a policy which was under the influence of realism, an ideology that Kennan was quick to adopt in his dealings with the Soviet Union. The goal of containment was simple: prevent the spread of communism. In application it made nations completely dependant on the United States for reconstruction and stability, and called for European economic integration. According to Kennan, politics and economics were directly related, aiding the death of communism by promoting healthy economies, like the Marshall Plan. By expanding upon the Marshall Plan, the United States helped economically and militarily to aid in the stabilization of Western Europe and other nations in need. (Containment through Economics, par 1-5) Dulles Plans.
John Foster Dulles responded to the threat of nuclear attacks during the Cold War with a collaboration of proposals known as massive retaliation. He wanted to have military superiority to crush communism. In January of 1954, Dulles declared that in the future the American response to aggression would be at places and with means of our own choosing. Dulles aggressive attitude toward the Soviet Union so much so that it was interpreted as hostile. Brinkmanship was one of the most famous of the proposals. He asked for the United States to push the Soviet Union to the brink of war and then eventually it would collapse under pressure. You have to take chances for peace, just as you must take chances in war… The ability to get the verge with out getting into war is the necessary art… If you try to run away from it, if you get scared to go to the brink, you are lost…
The Essay on Marshal Plan Marshall Aid European
On June 5, 1947, Secretary of State George C. Marshall spoke at Harvard University and outlined what would become known as the Marshall Plan. Europe (still devastated by World War II) had just survived one of the worst winters on record. The nations of Europe had nothing to sell for hard currency, and the democratic socialist governments in most countries were unwilling to adopt proposals for ...
We walked to the brink and we looked it in the face. We took strong action, Dulles remarked. Kennan’s proposals and Dulles’ proposals were directly in opposition to each other. Surprisingly, Dulles was not a realist. He was a moralist. He was for the protection of democracy and human rights, even though his reactions ….
