How did Stalin use industrialisation and collectivisation to consolidate his power in the 1930s? Stalin used both collectivisation and industrialisation to consolidate power in Russia during the 1930s. Both policies allowed him to gain control over the economy, and to discredit or eliminate his rivals within the Communist Party. Without these programs, there could have been no totalitarian rule in Russia. Even before launching his economic program in 1929, Stalin used the industrialisation debate of the 1920s to gain ascendancy over his rivals. Initially, he sided with Bukharin in supporting NEP as the path to industrialisation.
However, once Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev had been removed, he accused Bukharin of supporting capitalism, and recommended Russia implement a system of command socialism. In 1929, NEP was abolished, and replaced with a system of state-run agriculture and industry, organised via Five Year Plans. This system gave Stalin effective control over the entire economy, and thereby the Soviet people. The most effective means of increasing Stalin’s power was collectivisation. This involved the elimination of private ownership of agricultural land, and its replacement with a system of state-owned and collectively-owned farms.
The peasants who worked on these farms were under the control of the Party, which in turn was under the control of Stalin. Inadvertently, collectivisation also gave Stalin the opportunity to eliminate large numbers of ‘class enemies’ – the kulaks – and to steel Party members to wholesale murder. Seven million people starved to death during the collectivisation process. Countless more were sent to labour camps, where they met a similar fate. Industrialisation was also crucial in helping Stalin consolidate his power. He understood that he could not hope to rule without popular support.
The Term Paper on Joseph Stalin: The Iron Power
The communist domination had emerged from the reign of Joseph Stalin. He led the Soviet Union which was considered as the foundation of communist states and emulated by other aspiring communist countries. As a Russian dictator, Stalin’s aggressive rule became known to be as ruthless, fearless, and domineering. Many say that his leadership caused more damage than the benefits given to Soviet Union ...
Power can only be acquired and retained by delivering benefits to significant numbers of people. In Stalin’s case, industrialisation shifted millions of people from the countryside to the cities, where jobs were plentiful and living standards higher than on state-run farms. Many of these people – formerly illiterate peasants – benefited from Stalin’s rule. At the same time, skilled urban workers – particularly those who belonged to the Communist Party – were recruited into positions of responsibility, to run the newly established factories and government departments.
As the historian Allan Bullock put it, these people “represented the spearhead of the large-scale upward mobility of the sons and daughters of the working class moving into higher education, administrative and managerial jobs in the years 1928-31. ” And as the higher echelons of the Party were purged, the pace and extent of that upward mobility increased. All these people owed their jobs and status to Stalin, and became the bedrock of his power base. Stalin also used the perception of economic success to consolidate his support within the Party and among the people.
