Communications Decency Act: Regulation In Cyberspace David HembreeOctober 23, 1996 Dr. Willis Being one of millions of surfers throughout the Internet, I see that fundamental civil liberties are as important in cyberspace as they are in traditional contexts. Cyberspace defined in Webster’s Tenth Edition dictionary is the on-line worlds of networks. The right to speak and publish using a virtual pen has its roots in a long tradition dating back to the very founding of democracy in this country.
With the passage of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, Congress has prepared to turn the Internet from one of the greatest resources of cultural, social, and scientific information into the online equivalent of a children’s reading room. By invoking the overboard and vague term “indecent” as the standard by which electronic communication should be censored, Congress has insured that information providers seeking to avoid criminal prosecution will close the gates on anything but the most tame information and discussions. The Communications Decency Act calls for two years of jail time for anyone caught using “indecent” language over the net; as if reading profanities online affects us more dramatically than reading them on paper. Our First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press… .” The Act takes away this right. The Constitution-defying traitors creating these useless laws do not they understand the medium they ” re trying to control.
The Research paper on Communication In Business And Information Technology
Communication for Business and Information Technology Case Study. OLYMPIA PRODUCTIONS: Introduction: Olympia Productions is in itself a product of five independent entities, combining their resources to create an efficient and effective partnership. The transition from separate businesses to a singular partnership has been a new experience to every part of the partnership. The matter of using a ...
What they “claim” is that they are trying to protect our children from moral threatening content. This “protect our helpless children” ideology is bogus. If more government officials were more knowledgeable about online information they would realize the huge flaw the Communication Decency Act contains. We don’t need the government to patrol fruitlessly on the Internet when parents can simply install software like Net Nanny or Surf Watch. These programs block all “sensitive ” material from entering one’s modem line. What’s more, legislators have already passed effective laws against obscenity and child pornography.
We don’t need a redundant Act to accomplish what has already been written. Over 17 million Web pages float throughout cyberspace. Never before has information been so instant, and so global. And never before has our government been so spooked by the potential power “little people” have at their fingertips.
The ability for anyone to send pictures and words cheaply and quickly to potentially millions of others seems to terrify the government and control freaks. Thus, the Communications Decency Act destroys our own constitution rights and insults the dreams of Jefferson, Washington, Madison, Mill, Brandeis, and DeToqueville. It’s funny, now that we finally have a medium that truly allows us to exercise our First Amendment right, the government is trying to censor it. Forget them! Continue to engage in free speech on the net. It’s the only way to win the battle.
