Hewlett-Packard/Compaq Merger In 2002, the (HP/Compaq) merger announcement was made by Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina and Compaq head Michael D. Capella’s. If in fact the merger goes through, it would be the largest merger in the computer industry history. Some may ask why this merger was so important to these companies. The truth of the matter is that both of these companies feel that this merger will benefit their company not only at the present time but in the future also. Along with a huge merger like this one, there are some pros and cons that affiliate with a huge merger like this one.
According to a reference article these are some of the reasons why some may support the merger and some reasons why some may oppose the merger: Why to support the merger: o The new HP will become the market leader in servers, storage, management software, printing and imaging, and PCs, improving our ability to offer the end-to-end solutions customers demand. o We will double our profitable and growing services business, enhance our R&D efforts, and extend our customer reach in 160 countries. o We will achieve annual cost savings of $2. 5 billion, adding $5 to $9 in present value to each HP share; and increase earnings per share by 13% during the first year following the merger. o By improving profitability in enterprise computing systems, in PCs and access devices, and in IT services, we will have the financial strength to extend our successful imaging and printing franchise into new multi-billion dollar categories like digital imaging and digital publishing. o The closer you look, the more you will see that the merger of HP and Compaq is the single best way to strengthen our businesses and improve our market position, deliver more of what our customers need, enhance opportunities for our employees, and increase the value of your investment.
The Term Paper on Ford Motor Company Customer Services Credit
By: Brenda Gonitzke Ford Motor Company began a manufacturing revolution with its mass productions assembly line in the early 1900's. Now the company is firmly entrenched in the status quo as the world's largest pickup truck maker and the number two producer of cars and trucks, behind General Motors. It makes vehicles with such brands as Aston Martin, Ford, Jaguar, Lincoln, Mercury, and Volvo. ...
Why to oppose the merger: o Acquiring market share does not translate to leadership, i. e. , demonstrated better business model, technology innovation or success at winning business from competitors. o Admission of no new significant technology / capabilities added to HP’s portfolio. Significant overlap creates cost synergies which are offset by revenue losses from rationalized products and service so Large stock transactions statistically more risky. Upon announcement of the proposed merger, Moody’s downgraded HP’s debt rating and put it on negative watch, S&P has also put HP on negative outlook o Bigger, but in an unattractive business, commodity computing.
Hardware as diminishing economies of scale and HP and Compaq already has significant scale. HP is doubling its exposure to a volatile business with declining margins, betting on cost savings in 2004 to achieve profitability o Integration planning is not integration. The impact is felt after closing. HP has outlined a plan for gradual integration over the next 18-24 months. Remember, this is a lifetime in technology and will be highly disruptive to business. As these companies decide to merge, one of the biggest challenges is cutting jobs.
At the time of the merger, 15, 000 jobs were lost. One of the next biggest challenges is to effectively get the 135, 000 employees to work together. Integration concerns such as how to combine the company’s two distinct cultures, have been on the top of their list of things that they had to work on as a result of this merger. Another problem is the concerns of some of the shareholders when it comes to fair profit splits. When they merge Hewlett-Packard’s shareholders would own approximately 64 percent of the company, while Compaq’s shareholders would own 36 percent when in truly they both should have had a 50/50 split to make it fair on all shareholders involved. Finally, there has been a big wave of domestic and cross-border corporate mergers and takeovers within the past few years.
The Essay on Organizational Culture, Business Strategy and HR Practices affect diverse teams‘ performance
The Later Findings: Organizational Culture, Business Strategy and HR Practices affect diverse teams‘ performance Effects of Organizational Culture and Business Strategies Effects of Organizational Culture and Business Strategies Diverse groups show a higher level of performance in a people-oriented culture Educationally diverse groups perform better within a growth-oriented business strategy ...
The term ‘corporate culture’ is sometimes described as issues like objectives, personal interests, behaviors etc. Many problems in cooperation and teamwork are blamed to culture differences. However, in a merger, ‘culture’ is more than making the people from both partners work together smoothly. The development of a new, shared culture is a critical factor for merger success.
References: web compaq merger. htm.
