Comparing Frankenstein with a modern horror movie Being initially developed as a ghost-story, Mary Shelleys Frankenstein included numerous issues varying from authors interpretations of the scientific and social theories to the description of general culture of the time. The story of Frankenstein was told by means of letters, and in the form of three narratives one inside the other, which attached to the story a certain degree of distancing. The logical result of the narrative distancing is a multiplicity of viewpoints regarding the main characters, Frankenstein and monster. Telling the story of Being, Mary Shelley utilizes many elements of the natural philosophy and chemistry of her time. Her novel represents an interesting non-expert testimony to the philosophical and scientific ideas of nineteenth century. The different accidents of life are not so changeable as the feelings of human nature. …now that I finished, the beauty of the dream vanished and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart, said Frankenstein, evaluating his new creation.
Although there were no given details regarding the bodies Frankenstein proposed to animate, once the first exprimental sample was completely formed, scientists collected the instruments of life about him so as to infuse a spark of being into the lifeless thing. The Being became alive and Frankenstein, in horror, ran out of the room. At that very moment, the Being meant nothing to scientist but experimental material and therefore, he had never given him a name or any identity. As far as he was concerned, the Being should have never been born. He was a major mistake of the scientist for which there was no need to apologize. Frankensteins experiments brought the issue of creatures fertility, spread and subsequent transformation into race, which could exterminate mankind.
The Essay on Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein 2
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is one of the most studied novels in the literary canon. The seemingly simple but highly complex story is set in Eighteenth century Europe, specifically in Geneva, the Swiss Alps, Ingolstadt, England and Scotland, and the northern ice (the Arctic). The major characters are Victor Frankenstein (the scientist), his creation (the monster), Robert Walton (narrator), ...
Thus, Frankenstein destroyed the incomplete female though he was aware of the Beings anger, and this way he unleashed series of murders of loved ones, including the Being himself. The image of death on a pyre was meant to emphasize the Being dignity. The majority of literary critics indicate that in her story Mary Shelley interconnected the central idea of Beings creation with contemporary views of the workings of Nature. Frankensteins theory about the nature of life is very similar to what can be found in scientific sources available to Mary Shelley and her contemporaries. Mary Shelley was a very educated person with excellent acquaintances among various intellectual circles. Initially the Being was created by Frankenstein in order to be beautiful, and to celebrate life. However, the Being fell from his creators grace and becomes a strange perversion of beauty.
Subsequently, he was cast away from his creators presence, and thus Mary Shelley emphasized that something created to be great and beautiful could be easily transformed into something loathsome and utterly different from its initial purpose. Continuing storys romantic patterns, Shelly brought to attention the idea of offspring rejection and thus revealed unambiguous themes of relationship between the Creator and people. The Being was left alone, and through the loneliness the monster experienced the most loathsome part of his existence, thus reinforcing the theme of happiness lying in close companions who complete the person. The pain caused by the attacks of the Being on close companions of Frankenstein illustrates the romantic idea that close companions are essential to life and the peace of the individual. In the story of Frankenstein, Shelley utilized the poetic power of nature as a force of foreshadowing. From the critical point of view, Victor was not the only character in the novel to have his feelings shadowed by nature.
The Essay on Frankenstein – Book Vs. Movie
Although in both movies and the book “Frankenstein” is portrayed as a monster there are many different perceptions about of him. In movies the monster will not stop at anything he was only out to hurt or destroy others as appose to the book where he tried to make friends and find someone to cherish and love. The book and movie both show different characteristics which the monster ...
When the sun had recovered its warmth, and the earth again began to look green I felt emotions of gentleness and pleasure . . . and I even raised my humid eyes with thankfulness towards the blessed sun which bestowed such joy upon me. Nature itself became a driving force for Victor in his scientific pursuit. Thus, on the night that Victor gave life to the Being, it was dark and dreary.
When Victor came back home on receiving word of Williams death, he noted, that night closed all around;and when I could hardly see the dark mountains, I felt still more gloomily. This picture appeared a vast and dim scene of evil, and I foresaw obscurely that I was destined to become the most wretched of human beings. Having portrayed the power of nature through scientific experiments and interference, Mary Shelley emphasized a true Romantic and utopian character of nineteenth-century literature. Creating a story of the monster and its maker, Mary Shelley unintentionally stimulated the appearance of numerous screenplays on the similar and interconnected topics. However, the old Dracula and Frankenstein movies provoke a mere cheap thrill in contemporary audience. Simultaneously with Mary Shelleys Frankenstein Hollywood produced Anne Rices Interview with the Vampire. Ironically, both movies have many similarities in ideas and screening.
For instance, both movies offer a scene of a man dancing with the corpse of a murdered woman, which actually does not symbolize anything but movies genre. However, screenplay writer and director N. Jordan indicated that the main idea was to make a movie without any reference to the cinematic horror tradition. The story of Interview with the Vampire is written from the point of view of the vampires, which are shocking, enthralling and disturbing. Lestat, one of the main characters, makes a makes a fierce impression, with blond hair, high cheekbones and a translucent, blue – veined paleness. Another important character is Louis, a reluctant vampire, the Being, initially created by Lestat, amoral predator for whom sex and hunger are inseparable things. Simultaneously, the vampire Being is tortured by guilt and compassion for his victims. and hunger are inseparable.
The Term Paper on An Analysis of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein
Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley was born in London in 1797 to radical philosopher, William Godwin, and Mary Wollstonecraft, author of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Wollstonecraft died 11 days after giving birth, and young Mary was educated in the intellectual circles of her father’s contemporaries. In 1814, at the age of seventeen, Mary met and fell in love with poet, Percy Bysshe ...
Louis remains racked by guilt and compassion for his victims. Frankenstein and Interview with Vampire are mutually linked in the concept of origin of life. According to Mary Shelleys scientific beliefs chemistry and electricity bring life into the Being, and in the vampires world blood and hunger for blood become origin of life, its continuation and sense of living. Blood flows freely throughout the movie: it drenches a womans dress, dries up on the lips of a little girl, and is squeezed from a rat into a crystal wineglass. Anne Rice emphasized the explicit connection between sex and blood through the longing for blood. Compared with sexy and esthetically fashionable vampirism of Interview with the Vampire, the story of Frankenstein look inelegant though more philosophical. If the former is about blood, the latter is about guts.
Even contrasting both movies one may notice that if Interview with the Vampire reveals ominous beauty, then Mary Shelleys Frankenstein is overloaded with an essential ugliness..
