One could never really be happy with what life gives them. We will always seek for more, it is what makes us human. These two short stories “The necklace” and “A rose for Emily” written by Guy De Maupassant and William Faulkner, show how the more you are unhappy with your life, the more unfortunate you will be and unsatisfied. Despite the fact that the two authors have nothing to do with the other, both their stories emphasize the idea of how you should be satisfied with what you are given, and believe in fate even though it is against what you want it is the right way to live. Maupassant lived from 1850 to 1893, he was born in a family of minor aristocrats, and lived in a rented castle. His parents had an unhappy marriage, and that may have influenced him in writing about Mathild in a way that shows she does not have a fortunate life. He lived in France where society ruled everything. His story was written after he got sick with a bacterial disease, that might also be related to such misfortune occurring in the story. As for William Faulkner, born in Mississippi in 1897, he was descended from a long line of Southern governors and public figures. Faulkner was said to be the most famous writer of all contemporary writers of the South. Part of William’s mom’s character reflects in Ms. Emily as she was very independent and an artistic person as well. Hence that may have inspired him in building Ms. Emily’s character.
Firstly, it may not be obvious to the readers at first but when they read through it carefully, they come to realize that Ms. Emily’s character shows the readers that her perspective of life is just wrong. She pushed everyone away from her. The society and the people around her had respect for her, however at the same time they feared her. Falkner chose these specifications, attitude and interaction with others for Ms. Emily to clearly show how the way she looks at life, and how she lives it is the exact way to stay miserable and isolated throughout life. “After her father’s death she went out very little; after her sweetheart went away, people hardly saw her at all.” Similarly with Mathild in “the necklace”, all she does is criticize the life she is living. She focuses on what she does not have; which is the money, being wealthy, and belonging to a higher class, instead of being grateful to the wonderful loving husband she has, who dedicated his life for her and would sacrifice everything for her. Mathild isolates herself from the outer world by staying home the whole time and despises the way she was born in a poor family. Mauppasant specified these descriptions for Mathild to explain to the reader that unhappiness leads to an unfortunate life. “Her tastes were simple because she had never been able to afford any other, but she was as unhappy.” The two stories come together to emphasize the point that no matter what you given in life, you ought to be grateful for it. The authors are trying to send a message through their stories, stating that even though in life one would think they have few things in life, it will always mean so much to someone else. Satisfaction is the key to a happy life.
The Essay on Family and Life Story Work
?In this assignment I aim to discuss life story work: which can provide the care worker, and care receiver a better understanding of each other’s needs, and provide the care worker with information that can help support the care receiver in the best way. The carer needs to possess certain skills sensitivity, confidentiality, empathy, trustworthiness, and have commitment to seeing the story to the ...
As it has been shown, the authors have both written the two stories in the end of the eighteen hundreds where the society and the people focused more on how people looked, and whether or not they are of a high class rather than one’s personality, the external appearance mattered to them more than he internal appearance. In other words, they judged a book by its cover. For instance Ms. Emily was judged by the society, because back then if the woman was not married by the age of thirty, the people would look at her differently in a sad, pathetic way. Therefore Ms. Emily excluded herself from the outer world and from everybody’s talk. “At last they could pity Miss Emily. Being left alone, and a pauper, she had become humanized.” Likewise with Mathild, the class system dominated the country. People believed that to look elegant and to be seen and heard by everybody else you have to be of a very high class, and dressed in the finest clothes. Thus Mathild always felt that she had to be in the higher class to be noticed by the society. “She suffered endlessly, feeling herself born for every delicacy and luxury.” The authors attempt to teach the reader that allowing the society to define who they are will not make them a better person, for how will everybody else accept who they are, if they do not accept themselves?!
The Essay on Emily The Fallen Rose
Emily the Fallen Rose Setting is place and time, and often provides more than a mere backdrop for the action of a story. William Faulkner uses this device in his complex short story A Rose for Emily to give insight into the lonely world of Miss Emily Grierson. Faulkner portrays the townspeople and Emily in the southern town of Jefferson during the late 1800 s to early 1900 s. The town is more than ...
When someone thinks about a rose, all they picture is a perfect looking red rose with beautiful scent, and it symbolizes love, whereas in A Rose for Emily there was no beautiful love shared, mostly it was a story of a sad, lonely woman, who barely had anyone to share love with, so her life was more like a dead rose with thrones all over it that hurts when touched. Similarly in The Necklace, a necklace usually gives one an image of a rich, fancy dressed woman with a necklace around her neck filled with diamonds and crystals. However, the necklace Mathild put on for the party, just brought her misfortune and made her live a poor sad life for ten years full of hard work that made her look like an old woman with wrinkles around her body and face. “Madame Loisel came to know the ghastly life of abject poverty.” The authors used those titles for the short stories to point out to the fact that nothing can be judged by the name and looks. Beauty comes from the inside, so just because one does not have the looks or the money or they come from a high class, does not mean they should feel bad and have a miserable life.
Both Mathild and Ms. Emily focus on what they do not have, therefore the bad lives they ended up having is a result of their actions. The decisions they made thinking it will make their lives better, did the exact opposite thing, it worsened it, because they were not satisfied with who they were. Also Maupassant and Faulkner, wrote both the stories in the same era to emphasize the society’s opinion back at that time which gave them the urge to try to fit in. A person must be proud to be who she/he is, they owe to themselves. And as the great Ibrahim Lincoln once said: “I like to see a man proud of the place in which he lives. I like to see a man live so that his place will be proud of him.”
The Report on How Did the Life of Ancient Greek or Roman Woman Differ from the Life of a Woman in the West Today?
Classical Civilisation thepiggrinder How did the life of ancient Greek or Roman woman differ from the life of a woman in the west today? Women in the modern western culture of today enjoy many more rights than those of ancient Greek and Roman women. Woman in the modern culture of the west today have an unrestricted amount of freedom (often supported by law such as diversity and equality ...
