One of the themes which happens to be the biggest one is burning books because they conflict with each other and the ideas of society. The firemen don’t fight fires, they start them when they find books. Recollections and thoughts, writings and teachings from the greatest minds in history go up inflames because the government doesn’t want people to fill their heads with it and develop an individual intelligence. The government is afraid of the books because they stimulate people’s minds to think for themselves and away from the main track that the general public was expected to follow. The government covered up the problems of the world that still wore on, like war, and didn’t let the people see it or have it affect them. They heard about it and that was all.
In general, people’s lives became better, but it was of no consequence because they didn’t know what it was like to have things not go well and as planned. A candy cane is much sweeter after you think about eating oil. Another reason they burn books is because they don’t agree and they aren’t real. The government figures that there is no use in people thinking about things that don’t exist, especially when each book’s ideas conflict. I think that conflicting ideas helps us think for ourselves because we are forced to make decisions.
Making a decision is a lot better when you have more food for thought to work with. Also, it would be boring not to have conflicting ideas. So many things that we value and we can be proud of in terms of the accomplishments of the human race went up inflames in the book. Everything from Socrates, Newton, the Bible, Thoreau, Hans Christian Anderson and Shakespeare was wiped out because they didn’t go together fluently with each other and the ideas of society at that time.
Book Review: International Conflict Resolution
The first chapter of the book talks about the peace-making and de-escalation strategies. It discusses the theoretical approaches of statism, pluralism and populism in reference to the international conflict. The author of the book convinces the reader that effective conflict resolution should make use of convincing power and positive sanctions. Therefore, he argues that win-win solutions are ...
Even if ideas changed, those writings could never be recovered, the ashes never reconstructed. I think the book was a good book for making you realize how important books really are. I hope this book never becomes a reality, and that it continues to be read so that other people can see how lucky we are to have them.
