Most people regard industrialization as a positive development capable of generating great wealth and revitalizing run-down areas. Mention industrialization today, and it brings to mind large factories organized with the latest technologies in mass producing. Along with these visions comes the promise of more jobs for the community, higher rates of pay, and financial stability. One can only think of the positive influences on a community that the opening of a new factory could bring, but during what some have deemed the Industrial Revolution, industrialization only meant using machines and new power sources to accomplish a task formerly done by human and animal power. Our modern day conception of industrialization can greatly influence our interpretation of historical industrialization and whether the progress it represented was positive.
In the late eighteenth century, a factory could be described as anything from genuinely large style plants situated in northeastern urban or urbanizing locales, to scores of comparatively smaller “country ” mills rooted in northern rural communities and buildings ranging from major free-standing structures to single floors of buildings. Unlike today’s concept of a factory which is just enormous buildings, modern technology, and numerous employees. In the 1800’s any sizable mechanized workplace was known as a factory, most of which were water-powered textile mills. Factory meant manufactory; it was a term contemporaries could properly apply to various arenas of production. Although most writers on America regard industrialization as closely linked to advances in capitalism, industrialization could not begin and grow without individual business owners who were willing to take a chance on something new.
The Term Paper on National building code
This part of the Code deals with safety from fire. It specifies the demarcation of fire zones, restrictions on construction of buildings in each fire zone, classification of buildings based on occupancy, types of building construction according to fire resistance of the structural and non-structural components and other restrictions and requirements necessary to minimise danger to life from fire, ...
It also involved a qualitatively sharpened focus on profit as the guiding goal of economic transactions. And it involved for the most part noble increments in free wage labor and in ranks of individuals who stood to such labor not as masters or patrons but as supervisors, employers, or capital investors. Some of the more wealthy storekeepers and farmers would invest in the woolen, cotton and paper factories, which was profitable for them, and also for the employees working in them. A lot of the employees were women and children doing the same things that they had been doing at home. This brought in income to help the families survive. But of course, this was not always viewed in a positive light. Progress usually always has consequences and not always positive ones.
The progress brought forth by the new factories indeed had its impact on cultural politics. As the factories hired more women and children as laborers, this increasingly caused problems within the family structure. Certainly, to follow one fault line of industrial employment, the disturbance stemming from extra-domestic authority imposed on families through outwork weighed far more heavily when workers entered the factories. For in practice country mills were known to intrude between parents and children on their payrolls, while mill girls not infrequently discovered painful dissidence between their roles as gainfully employed operatives and their identities as females in a society still imbued with patriarchy. Women were still considered on a lesser scale than men and although the larger factories paid better than the small ones, women were still paid less than men for doing the same job. Industrialization created a unique new category of people who were becoming more and more dependent on their factory jobs and the products produced.
Working in factories meant more self-discipline and less personal freedom for the workers and this system tended to depersonalize society and reduced workers to an impersonal status. There were rumors from outsiders of the harsh and unjust working conditions in the factories. Workers suffered long working hours and sometimes even abuse. Combined with the regimen of watchful discipline conditioning early factories, these tensions and constraints helped define the industrial order and turned factories into unsettled amalgams of opportunity and wearisome pressure. How- to raise the final consequence we will consider- did factory workers respond to this mix? How did they react to what they experienced? A lot of the workers accepted the working conditions for what they were, a known part of factory working standards. However, there were groups that turned defiant at times and put up a resistance to the working relations. Consequentially, these resistance groups eventually created the codes of values and behavior that became elements of the working-class culture.
The Term Paper on Impact Of Telecommuting On Workers, Employers, And Society
Abstract Telecommuting is a growing trend, not only in the United States, but also around the world. This trend towards telecommuting is affecting workers, employees, society, and technological needs and products. As popularity expands, people are becoming increasingly aware of the pros and cons associated with this style of work. Legal concerns regarding telecommuting are coming to the forefront ...
In conclusion, the sprouting of new factories was not all there was to the Industrial Revolution, but it was a major factor. These were some changing times. There were those who believed that society would benefit greatly from this industrialization, and others who feared that human life would become devalued in some way by it. In the end however, the benefits that industrialization and manufacture brought to the country far outweighed the downsides, and brought the nation into a whole new era.
