In Book I of Nicomachea n Ethics, Aristotle states that the ultimate human goal or end is happiness. Aristotle describes the steps required for humans to obtain happiness. Aristotle states that activity is an important requirement of happiness. He states that a happy person cannot be inactive. He then goes on to say that living a life of virtue is something pleasurable in itself. The virtuous person takes pleasure in doing virtuous things.
The role of virtue is an important one for Aristotle. Without virtue, it seems one cannot obtain happiness. Virtue acts as a linking factor to happiness. Aristotle states that the human function is the life activity of the part of the soul that has reason. He extends this further by stating that some sort of activity of the past of the soul that has reason has to be according to virtue. This will create a good man.
For Aristotle, in order to be happy, humans must perform their function well in accordance with virtue. In Book II, Aristotle makes a distinction between two types of virtues; those which are considered ethical and those which are considered intellectual. Ethical virtues deal with actions of courage, generosity, and moderation. Intellectual virtues deal with wisdom and contemplation. Ethical virtues are created through habitual actions.
Aristotle says that humans are not born with a natural capacity for virtue. He believes that education and cultivation as youth by one’s parents are pivotal in setting up humans’ ability in making virtuous acts habitual. He feels that humans have to perform virtuous actions as much as possible and through this humans can make a step in becoming virtuous. Aristotle also states that ethical virtues have to be attended by pleasure. He believes that humans cannot be pained when committing a virtuous action.
The Essay on Aristotle’s Conception of Happiness
... ones that he had. ” (Aristotle 21) Aristotle’s conception of happiness supports the view of only the virtuous person can be said to ... mean towards obtaining happiness. Happiness is the fulfilling of human function, or the activity of the soul according to virtue. Happiness comes from the ... goods and one needs these externals goods to be happy. Aristotle states, “For a man is not very likely to be ...
If a human is pained by an action then it is not considered virtuous. Aristotle goes on to create a distinction between virtuous actions and virtuous character. In a sense, it is a relationship of seeming versus being. Seeming versus being where a virtuous act may seem to be virtuous when it in reality is not. Whereas, a virtuous character actually is virtuous and as a result, actions done by one of virtuous character result in those actions being considered virtuous.
An act is not considered virtuous unless it is done by a virtuous person. Aristotle supports this assertion by stating three criteria for an action to be virtuous. First, one has to know the act is virtuous. Second, one has to intend to do it for its own sake. Therefore, one is not expecting anything in return as a result of the action. Thirdly, the action has to be done by one who, when he acts he does so in a certain and firm manner.
Aristotle makes the conclusion that most humans do not actually act virtuously. They instead discuss and philosophize about these actions, but do not act on them. This, Aristotle said, is unacceptable because one will not actually accomplish anything by just talking about it. Following the distinctions of what equates to a virtuous character, Aristotle describes what aspect of the soul results in virtue. Aristotle states that there main aspects of the soul. One being that involving feelings.
Feelings are the raw human emotions which humans experience. The next aspect is being that which involves power. Power is humans’ disposition to certain feelings and their ability to be affected by them. The last aspect is that which involves habit. Aristotle concludes that the first two aspects cannot result in or involve virtue because the nature of feelings and power are not subject to praise or blame. They cannot be considered good or bad, because they are beyond our control.
The Essay on Aristotle And Virtue Happiness Man One
... be considered brave. According to Aristotle happiness is the result of being virtuous which is the result of fulfilling our purpose, reason, ... or exceed what is right in both passions and actions, while virtue finds and chooses that which is intermediate.' The question ... address books, but as fulfillment of our potential as human beings. Aristotle says that a thing (or person) achieves happiness when ...
They exist due to nature. The last aspect of habit is the one which results in virtue. Habits involve the way one responds to the previous two elements which are beyond human control. Habit is the aspect which does involve human control and responsibility. The way one responds to their feelings or power is habit. Habit allows for reason to influence human responses.
Habit therefore results in humans’ ability to be judged on performance, as whether good or bad. Virtue, as a result, is the habit that makes humans good people and makes humans perform their function well. Aristotle in Chapter 5 of Book II began to discuss what the human virtue consists of. He concluded that human virtue consists of a mean. A mean is relative to humans because of humans’ differences and the particular situations humans encounter. Aristotle states that hitting the mean is to have feelings at the right time, for the right things, towards the right people, and for the right purpose in the right manner.
He states “this is the mean and the best, and it is precisely this which belongs to virtue” (Line 24, Chapter 5, Book II).
Aristotle gives the example of bravery as an example of hitting the mean. He states that in relation to the feeling of fear, one extreme is having too much courage which results in rashness, while the other extreme is having too little courage which results in cowardliness. The mean therefore would be the right amount of courageousness, resulting in the virtue of bravery.
Aristotle also states that the mean is not an exact intermediate point and that sometimes the mean is closer to one extreme than another. Such as with bravery, the virtue of bravery is closer to that of rashness, because it takes more than average courageousness to act bravely. Aristotle then explains that the mean is relative to each person. There is no standard or correct amount, but instead a correct amount for each individual. After defining the mean, Aristotle states that obtaining the mean is virtually impossible and as a result hitting the mean is extremely rare.
The Essay on Aristotle concept of virtue
The concept of virtue by Aristotle can be attributed to the state of character which he believed lies between two broad extremes which are the excess and deficiency. He believed that virtues falls into two major categories which are the moral virtue and the intellectual virtue. He considered moral values to be associated with feelings, choosing and acting well while intellectual is being acquired. ...
Aristotle uses the example of Odysseus to show how sometimes the middle ground and / or mean cannot be reached. He says that by aiming at the mean success is more readily achieved. Calypso told Odysseus that while returning home he was to encounter two extreme problems. One is a whirlpool, another extreme being that of a six-headed monster.
Calypso told Odysseus that there was no middle ground, but to aim for it, and when he reached the two extremes to choose the lesser of the two which was the six-headed monster. Whereas, if he was to have chosen the whirlpool, everyone would have died instead of just six men as with the six-headed monster. This for Aristotle amounted to the conclusion that because the mean is almost impossible to reach, by just aiming for the mean and choosing the lesser of two extremes or evils then one would still benefit. Although, truly virtuous character results from hitting the mean, humans can still benefit by being able to make the best decisions possible in choosing the lesser of two evils.
The meaning of virtue is one which is complex. While Aristotle gives an interesting and somewhat substantial argument for what virtue is, it still lacks a concrete definition. In life, there are too many situations and circumstances to decide how humans’ actions should be automatically measured. To be virtuous is not as cut and dry as Aristotle makes it to be. To be virtuous is to have integrity, act unselfishly and to act to the best of one’s ability, at which point that person has been virtuous. To say that a truly virtuous action does not exist if not for a virtuous man doing them, is too basically say virtuous actions never occur.
This is simply not true. Many people commit virtuous acts all the time, but due to an inability to hit the mean they are not virtuous and therefore their action is not considered virtuous. This simply is not true. It seems that the action should define the act not the person. In a big way aiming at the mean makes people better, but it is not the only thing that exists.
In other words, by striving for perfection people often do very well and even their best. This can be considered virtuous. Virtuosity is not as a narrow goal as Aristotle spells it out to be. Aristotle in essence equates virtuosity with a grade of 100, but the majority of people do not receive 100’s all the time. They strive for 100’s, but in doing so they score 82. This is not 100, but it is still considered good and in a sense would be considered virtuous.
The Term Paper on Affirmative Act Action People White
We have seen in the United States that there have been many groups who have been in one way or form discriminated against. The very people who framed the Constitution of the United States are the same people who wrote the laws that discriminate against large segments of the population. The majority of these individuals were white males who literally held the power. This created a cultural dynamic ...
Concluding, in America today virtue exists on a scale of maybe 70-100, resulting in degrees of virtue, but all encompassing the status of virtue. If virtuosity was held to the strict standards of Aristotle, humans would never act virtuously. Although still a minority, people of virtuous character exist more than as would be spelled out by Aristotle. Aristotle was on the right path, but he made his argument too specific, and as a result made virtue something that it is not.
