This essay will attempt to analyse and explain all the causes and factors that lead to the choice of Constantinople as eastern capital of the empire. From the very outset the reasons for such a catalytic “move”, which provided the impetus for the creation of a new era, will be examined as lucidly as possible. To conclude, having appraised the above, much light will be thrown on the choice of Constantinople, amongst other locations, as the eastern capital of the empire in terms of geographical position, religious and economical factors. Numerous were the reasons that gradually led to the movement of the empire to the East. Initially, Rome was very far from the regions of the shores of the Bosphorus and the river Euphrates and thus unable to confront effectively the empire’s most significant enemies (the Goths and the Persians) that had made their appearance from the 3 rd century. Additionally, Rome, a centre of paganism, with its memories of municipal traditions and “republican sentiment, with its aristocratic, educated and fiercely traditionalist senators “, had begun to annoy the Roman Emperor Constantine the Great (337-362).
He, himself, was a vigorous supporter of Christianity and especially after the prolonged period of his successful confrontation with Licinius (314-323), he was convinced that the future belonged to the Christians and for that reason, he decided to turn decisively towards the East, which was the main source and origin of the new religion. Furthermore, from the 3 rd century onwards, most of the emperors originated from provinces and did not share significant bonds with Rome. What Constantine visualise d instead of sacrifices to pagan deities and four emperors with irregular courts and capitals, was an empire with one emperor and one established capital, along with a splendid innovative church devoted to the glory of the one true God. He therefore regarded the foundation of a new city as the most important symbol of his deeper aim, the renewal of the empire.
The Essay on The Roman Empire Eastern Emperor
The remains of the Western Roman state had been ruled since 476 by Odovacar, as supposed viceroy in the West to Eastern Emperor Zeno. The latter was uncomfortable with this arrangement, as Odovacar had presented him with a fait accompli. At the same time, in the mid 480 s, Zeno was facing repeated invasions into Eastern Roman lands by the Ostrogoths under Theodoric. After the uprising against and ...
In 324, the old Greek trading city of Byzantium (modern Istanbul) was chosen by Constantine the Great as the ultimate spot for the new city that would form the headquarters of the empire in the East and was renamed after his own name, Constantinople (Constantin ou-polis).
It is a fact that among the fundamental criteria for choosing this specific location were its strategic geographical position between Europe and Asia, its strategic value for the command of the seas and of the main routes over-land from East to West and from North to South, as well as the right connection between the centre and the periphery of the Empire. Constantinople with its pure and tender climate was situated exactly at the threshold of Asia in a surrounding region at the eastern end of the Thracian peninsula, between the shores of the Bosphorus, Propontis (the Sea of Marmara) and the Keratius gulf (the Golden Horn) and occupied the most eastern end of this wide triangular region. This site not only united Europe and Asia but also created a bridge of communications between the Black Sea and all Southern Russia with the greater part of Europe and Asia, and even with distant America. Constantinople was surrounded by water on all sides apart from the west, which would be protected by walls. More specifically, its southern coast was doused by Propontis, while its north-eastern side was blessed by nature with a wide, deep and navigable harbour of approximately 5 miles in length, which constituted a magnificent natural port and a practically impregnable rampart, known from the ancient years as the Golden Horn.
Additionally, not only was Constantinople now closer to the Roman Empire’s enemies, but even an attack from the sea would be easier said than done as Propontis, was protected by two oblong straits (Bosphorus in the East and Ellispontos in the West).
The Term Paper on Alexander The Great Greek City Asia
ALEXANDER THE GREAT ALEXANDROS PHILIP POU MAKEDONON (356-323 BC). More than any other world conqueror, Alexander III of Macedon, or ancient Macedonia, deserves to be called the Great. Although he died before the age of 33, he conquered almost all the then known world and gave a new direction to history. Alexander was born in 356 BC at Pella, the capital of Macedon, a kingdom north of Hellas ( ...
Apart from its geographical location, Constantine the Great was intrigued by Constantinople’s position from an economical aspect as well, since it was situated in the crossroad between trading routes of major significance at the time. These routes, subdivided into the maritime and the territorial route, served as a link between the Black Sea and the Aegean and Mediterranean Seas and between Asia and Europe respectively. The city was also accessible to Egypt’s supplies of grain, which were necessitated in order to provide for the large population that would hopefully be attracted to this town. Additionally, Constantine the Great chose Constantinople following a tendency of the conquerors and rulers at that time, which was the establishment of cities at the places were they had won military victories. He took his decision with all the more enthusiasm and determination since it was in this region of Bosphorus that Constantine had won his last and historic victory over Licinius at Chrysopolis.
Yet there was indeed another essential reason for this choice. As Constantine was the first Roman emperor to adopt Christianity, Constantinople was to stand solely as a Christian city expressing his beliefs and convictions, “while the capital on the Tiber long remained the stronghold of the older faith .” Indeed Constantine succeeded in his ambition and Constantinople has been in every era, as the great ecclesiastical centre of Orthodoxy and of the whole of Christendom. What can be gleaned from all the above and should be born in mind at all times is that the founding of Constantinople was not merely a strategic choice of Constantine, due to the fact that it was organically interconnected to a wider program dedicated to the radical renaissance of the Roman Empire. In this program the idea of renaissance and renewal of the Empire did not invoke a simple transformation or even division of the Empire, but a complete reconsideration and rearrangement of its structures in order to implement the idea and hope of its salvation.
The Essay on Constantine The Great Christianity Emperor Licinius
... empire. Although Constantine used Licinius' war chest, which he had captured there, to meet the expenses of the new construction in Constantinople, ... program was quite extensive and included the construction of churches and paganism was excluded from the city. Constantine had the city ... represented on the imperial throne. Constantine can rightfully claim the title of 'Great', for he turned the history ...
Only within the context of this wider reformatory program, can the founding of Constantinople, as a New Rome, be understood. Constantinople emerged from this program and acquired all the elements of brilliance of Old Rome and became the new head of the empire as a renewed extension of the latest. To sum up, the choice of Constantinople as eastern capital of the empire was based on a mixture of numerous reasons and needs, concerning mainly the geographical, economical and religious potentials of the specific city. Its ideal geographical location, the prolific and promising economic conditions, along with the dominating element of Christianity constituted the most tailored area for the birth of a glorious empire. BIBLIOGRAPHY Baynes, N. H.
(1949) The Byzantine Empire, OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Hussey, J. M. (1957) The Byzantine world, The Anchor Press Ltd. Norwich, J. J. (1996) Β Υ Ζ Α Ν Τ Ι Ο , Ο ι π ρ ώ τ ο ι α ι ώ ν ε ς , Ε κ δ ό σ ε ι ς Κ Α Π Ο Ν Great, M.
(1993) The emperor Constantine, Weidenfeld & Nicolson Charlesworth, M. P. (1951) The Roman empire, OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS.
