With the recent corporate scandals involving such companies as Enron and Martha Stewart, the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has once again made its way to the forefront of contemporary management ideologies. However, CSR itself is not a new concept. In fact, societies as far back as the Ancient Mesopotamian’s (circa 1700 BC) incorporated CSR in their businesses. “King Hammurabi introduced a code in which builders, innkeepers or farmers were put to death if their negligence caused the deaths of others, or major inconvenience to local citizens.” With each new “Enron” managers of similar corporations are suddenly placed in the spotlight, causing plans to be put into action to create a more socially responsible company.
Look in an annual report put out by any corporation and you will generally find an entire section, often called a “CSR Report,” detailing how that corporation is continually striving to improve their CSR. So the question arises, are present corporations more or less socially responsible than the corporations of the past? Has implementing good CSR become a necessity for managers of today’s corporations? Milton Hershey is a prime example of someone who wholeheartedly believed in the concept of CSR. Upon building his chocolate manufacturing plant in Pennsylvania, Hershey built a school to support orphaned children, which still stands as the largest pre-K through 12 th grade school in the United States. During the Depression, Hershey kept men employed with the construction of hotels, office buildings, and a sports arena. It was said of Milton Hershey that “[h]is personal convictions about the obligations of wealth and the quality of life in the town he founded have made the company, community, and school a living legacy” (Wolfe, web).
The Review on Does CSR Help or Hinder a Company’s Performance?
This literature review explores the state of the art in corporate social innovation research. It briefly outlines the main themes in the corporate social responsibility (CSR) debate organizational legitimacy, moral choices, stakeholder interaction, sustainable development radical and user driven innovation. The paper then reviews the major objects of corporate social innovation singling out and ...
Milton Hershey’s legacy is of someone that understood the way a corporation should give back to its community and employees. We can wonder, what were Hershey’s motives behind integrating such a degree of CSR into his company’s ideologies? The answer to this lies in the time period in which Hershey lived. In those days there did not exist the technology we take for granted today, namely the internet. With the advent of this technology, companies today are scrambling to see who can toot their own horn the loudest about how socially responsible they are. CSR has become a tool of PR spin-doctors within corporations, who realize it has become a superficial cornerstone of contemporary business ideologies. Not only do companies create entire reports on the topic of CSR in their organization for their annual reports, these reports have taken the form of sections on their corporate web-sites.
Any major corporation worth its salt has a web-site, which is available at the touch of a button for anyone to see. Milton Hershey did not have a web-site; he did not have the internet. Milton Hershey and corporations of his time were intrinsically motivated to implement CSR into their businesses because it was the right thing to do. One point to make is that while corporations of the past were sincere about being socially responsible, it can not be said that all of them, or even most of them practiced CSR. In fact, more corporations today have worked CSR into their businesses. Mostly any large corporation has picked up on the ideas of CSR and realized that most consumers tend to frown upon companies that are not socially responsible and choose instead to purchase goods from companies with a more CSR-minded business structure.
The Essay on Sony Corporation Company Products Equipment
Sony Corporation-Company Information Sony was founded in Tokyo in 1946 by engineer Masaru Ibu ka and Akio Morita, a physicist. They started the company with 20 employees repairing electrical equipment and attempting to build their own products. The company's success started in 1946 when Sony launched Japan's first transistor and the first "all-transistor" radio in 1955. In the more than 50 years ...
But are these CSR practices just sugarcoating these corporations? Enron, before their recent scandal caused by CEO Kenneth Lay, was at the forefront of CSR. This makes one wonder, could it all be a window dressing? How could a corporation such as Enron, which placed such emphasis on being socially responsible to its community (which involved its shareholders and employees), turn out to be one of the most corrupt corporations in history? The roots were bad. No matter how beautiful a tree’s plumage and flowers – no matter how strong its branches – if the roots are rotten the tree will die. In Enron’s case, Kenneth Lay’s morality leaves something to be desired, even though his employees were taught all along to buy into this whole CSR thing. Senior management can put into action all the plans in the world to implement better CSR within their corporations, but if they themselves do not practice social responsibility there is no hope for their company to become more socially responsible. For example, say a large automotive manufacturer has recently decided to become more socially-conscious, but its plant manager has continually ordered the waste oil of that day to be dumped into the river behind the plant.
Since the executives have no idea this has been happening, they do not provide the manager with any increased budget to properly dispose of the waste oil. Not wanting to lose his job he turns the other cheek as his employees continue to dispose of the oil as before. Who’s responsible here? Is it the plant manager’s responsibility to tell the executives what he’s been doing with the oil and that he would require more money to properly dispose of it, or is it the executives fault for not thoroughly inspecting their plant’s processes? My point is that without the proper implementation, an actual transformation in the way a company is run, CSR means nothing. It is not my intention or purpose to dispel the notion that there are companies in existence that really and genuinely care about their employees, their shareholders, and their community and the environment. In fact I have had the pleasure of working for one of these types of corporations for the past few summers. Last summer, while working for this company, which manufactures and exports solar heating systems for pools, I was given the task of creating a portion of the web-site devoted to the company’s various involvements in the community.
The Essay on 401 K Plans Company Stock Employees
401 (k) Plans There are many economic issues facing the nation today. While some are extremely important in determining how the economy is balanced, others are not. Although this is true, that does not necessarily make these lesser important issues obsolete. Take, for example, the recent issue of corporate leaders matching contributors to the 401 (k) plan with company stock, instead of with cash. ...
The very nature of that industry involves being environmentally responsible, and yet the President of the company still felt it necessary to create some type of CSR report that potential customers could observe. This particular company has been involved in several programs within the community, including continually raising funds for the American Cancer Society and Find-A-Cure (for children with Muscular Dystrophy), and has donated several of their solar pool heating systems to summer camps like Paul Newman’s Hole In The Wall Gang and an inner-city recreation center for a school in Washington, D. C… Why would this company, whose sole product is built around helping the environment, need to involve themselves in such community-oriented activities? Being the largest manufacturer and distributor of solar pool heating systems in the world, this company has a social obligation to share its wealth and support its community. Much like the way the United States’ foreign policy dictates that, being a worldwide superpower, it is our obligation to assist others in need.
Many of the larger corporations today have successfully reformed their organizational structures to incorporate CSR into their ideologies. For example Xerox Corp. , one of the “best places to work” in the U. S. , has had great success in motivating their employees and increasing productivity levels. By taking their employees’ personal needs into account, they have created a desirable workplace environment, and as a result Xerox employees are willing to work harder and stay longer with the company, increasing productivity and cutting down on training costs for new employees.
Xerox has also taken action to help the environment, and has created a program to minimize or eliminate waste from their factories. The company has also made it possible for all of their machines to be recycled and reused – which besides helping the environment has helped their bottom line by saving them tens of millions of dollars in the past 15 years. Xerox is a good example of a transformation from within the company, which can be seen in changes made to the company such as the environment-friendly programs and the way it supports its employees. So, are companies in present times more or less socially responsible than past corporations? In the past, corporations – while few and far in between – CSR seems to have been a genuine decision based on the top-level management / executives of that company in order to fulfill their social obligation to the community and to their employees. Today, while there are many companies that have successfully reformed their corporations through the implementation of CSR, we are constantly reminded of the often superficiality which CSR policies can bring to a company. Many times a corporation will say they are working to become a socially responsible corporation to put on a good face for the public eye, while in reality no real changes have been put into action.
The Business plan on Management Ability Business Company Corporations
With the growing number of corporations taking over small businesses, and the belief that becoming a proprietor is associated with being wealthy, one must decide which type of business to become involved with. There are several differences between these two types of business. A corporation is a business organization having a continuous existence independent of its members (owners) and power and ...
One could argue that present corporations are more socially responsible due to the current treatment of employees, however the way I see it that treatment is because of labor laws that have been put into effect in the past few decades that all corporations are forced to follow. Therefore, I believe that companies were more socially responsible in the past than they are today.
