It can be argued that the Federalists were the first political party in the United States. Their goal was simple; to unite the states and form a strong central government. There were various attempts at uniting the states, the first of which was the Articles of Confederation. These articles were not effective due to the fact that they did not have the power to tax the States or the power to enforce a uniform commercial policy. This caused the government to basically go bankrupt, and when this occurred, it was evident that the Federalists had failed in their plan of union. Their next attempt, the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, was successful in uniting the States, but still lacked the necessary acceptance of the people. Due to the failure of the Articles, the people did not trust the Federalists who created them, and in effect, would not allow those same men to gain supreme power of the country by creating a strong central government.
The Federalists were not successful in handling the problems that faced this newly created nation because they lacked the power of a strong central government. The people of the United States were not satisfied with the way that the government was handling matters which pertained directly to them; which was without their consent. This is shown in the case of the Whiskey Rebellion (Document D).
The Whiskey Tax was implemented due to the fact that the federal government needed to raise money to pay off state debts. Hamiltons plan was to tax Jeffersons supporters; this way he would not lose any of his own supporters, and at the same time he would be raising the necessary funds with which he would pay off the states debts. The fact that the farmers took violent action against government officers, such as tax collectors and federal marshals, shows that this government was not as strong as it thought it was, in that the people still thought that violence was an acceptable measure in accomplishing your goals. The Treaty of New York with the Creeks (Document A) is another example of the government passing laws without the consent of the people.
The Essay on State Vs Federal Powers
The United States of America prides itself on it's democratic government, but the power of the federal government todays threatens American democracy. The Federal Government should grant states more powers to govern themselves. States' Rights, in United States history, advocated the strict limitation of the advantages of the federal government to those powers assigned to it in the Constitution of ...
People did not feel that this treaty was just, because ceasing their alliance with France, who helped them in the war, and starting a friendship with the Native Americans who fought against them in the war, was not a smart thing to do (Document C).
This treaty, as well as the Whiskey Rebellion, are examples of the Federalist government being selfish, and putting their own personal beliefs over those of the people. The men who ran the government were not kings; they were representatives; and the fact that they enacted laws which portrayed what they wanted, and not what the people for whom they were representing wanted, shows that this republic was not a strong government simply based on the fact that in a republic, power is supposed to come from the people; and the ideas of the people should therefore be the ideas which are acted upon by the government (Document E).
The fact that the government had to spend time fighting internally contributed greatly to its general weaknesses. The reason that fighting took place was because the government was run by two sets of people: the Republicans and the Federalists. These groups had conflicting opinions on many, if not all, of the issues that were discussed while they were in session.
One of their arguments was based on the Alien and Sedition Acts, which were created and passed by the largely Federalist government of the time. These acts gave the government power that was clearly unconstitutional, but since the Federalists were in charge and the acts benefited them, they were passed. The Republicans argument against these acts was explained in the Virginia Resolutions and the Kentucky Resolutions (Document I).
The Essay on Expansion Of Government Power
Expansion of Government Power During the Civil War and Reconstruction Contrary to what I believed in the past, the United States federal government retained and expanded their power and authority during the years of the Civil war along with the period of Reconstruction. Through drafts and monitored elections, they exercised this power during the Civil War. Then, as Reconstruction began, they ...
These resolutions explained that the power being given to the federal government by these acts was unconstitutional, and the power which was in fact constitutional, was constitutionally that of the states. Arguments such as this took a lot of time to complete, and in the end, they were counterproductive. The Federal government was not able to comply with the rules that they themselves made in writing the constitution; and if the government could not follow their own rules, they could not expect the people whom they are governing to follow them either.
Although the Federalist government was not efficient in handling most problems facing the nation, there were some areas in which they succeeded in fixing certain problems, which in turn helped the nation as a whole. One major problem of this time was based on the power of the State governments versus the power of the Federal government. One aspect of this situation was the problem of who has power in court trials. The way that they resolved this was with the Judiciary Act of 1789 (Document B) which made it so that all crimes which infringed on federal laws, would be heard in district courts, which were placed in each state, and all crimes which were not related to federal law, but rather to state law, would be held in the states courts. This was one Federalist act in which the nation did in fact benefit in the long run. The people of the United States believed that the Federalist government was not successful in handling the problems which it faced, and in turn the next government voted in was Republican. The reason behind this is that with different methods behind their actions, the Republicans were bound to accomplish more then the Federalists did.
While the Republicans were in power, there were many leaps and bounds that this nation went though, and most of them were for the better. It is clear that this government is more successful then it was under Federalist rule because for the thirty years after the Federalists lost their political power, the nation prospered more then it did when they did have the power.
The Essay on United States Government Power Americans
... this new government the powers of the different states would not be as powerful as the federal powers. This meant that states could no ... it as a strong central government. However, the anti-Federalists thought that a strong government would threaten state governments and the liberties of ... protect the rights of the people. Under this new government the nation would be able to grow and become stable. ...
