Death Penalty While you are sleeping, at 3: 00 in the morning, your house is broken into. The violators find your daughter, viciously rape and murder her, as they hold you back making you helpless, and there is nothing you can do about it. Would you want capitol punishment for these violators, or just another slap on the wrist? One lady in California said “I want them to pay.” Just a few months after this, this very thing happened to her. The Death Penalty is one of the most controversial laws in the United States today.
Rather it should be carried out or not is the question, and no matter what is said, shouts come from extremists on both sides of the issue. Many extremists on the opposite side of the issue say that there is an extreme cost in caring out the death penalty. When in actuality, yes there is. But that cost does not even compare to the thousands of dollars spent caring for an inmate in a prison, each year. The “Wrong Man” argument is most likely the biggest argument brought up. There is no bringing back a corps.
Very true, but today with DNA testing, courts can prove either yes he or she did or did not commit the crime they were convicted for. Because of this 85 people have been set free in the last 25 years. Since the Death Penalty was brought back into law in 1976, there are only 13 states that do not carry out this practice. Them being Alaska, Maine, Minnesota, Vermont, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Massachusetts, North Dakota, West Virginia, Iowa, Michigan, Rhode Island, Wisconsin, all of which have a higher crime rate per kappa than those states with the Death Penalty in practice.
The Essay on Death Penalty 35
This paper will fallow the process of a capital trial from arrest to execution. It will discus the aspects of federal and state law, trial, appeal, and executions. It will go into further detail on arraignment and the trail details of defense and sentencing. The federal law on capital punishment begins with the constitution, which states in the eighth amendment of the bill of rights that, no ...
Thus, going to show, that people who do not have to fear losing their own life are more likely to take the life of another. Another issue that the Anti-Death Penalty side brings up is that it is racist and that it is more likely to see a black man on death row than a white man. Where as social science research has found no consistent evidence proving such. And 56% of the people executed were white and only 35% black. Yes! There are more blacks on death row than whites, but it is not racist that those black men and women decided to rape or murder the night they did their crimes. It is not racist that they didn’t get away with their crimes.
It is not racist, it is LAW! Respect for human life and the morality of the whole issue is often brought up as well. They say that it is immoral. But as Alex Kozinski, or the U. S. 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals stated “Most of the us continue to believe that those who show utter contempt for human life by committing remorseless, premeditated murder justly forfeit the right to their own life.” Those who are sentenced to death have time to prepare for death. They may make a will and a last statement, and realize what they have done.
While the victims never do get that chance. Never get the chance to tell their loved ones good bye, or come to peace with differences they had. Their life is over. So I do not believe that killing those who do such terrible crimes to humanity is immoral, however the crimes they committed are. The Bible even advocates death for such crimes as murder, kidnapping, and witchcraft.
Do you want to argue with the Bible, because that is exactly what Anti-Death Penalty extremists are doing. So, back to the question at hand. Your daughter, sister, close friend, mother, has just been raped and viciously murdered. Now, that it is a little closer to home. Do you want them to pay for the crimes they committed or be set free for it to happen to someone else. Just think about that..
