All empires constantly evolve, declining and rising in status. Many empires have collapsed, only to start again under a different name. Like all empires, the three Muslim Empires, the Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals have faced this inevitable state. Although each individual empire is different, they each have similarities in their reasons for decline. Whether it is social, religious, economic, or political reasons, the empires, like many others, have fallen.
The Ottoman Empire, founded by Osman, had started in the northwestern corner of the Anatolian Peninsula. The empire expanded rapidly, only to weaken again. The first visible decline was the loss of territory at the Battle of Carlowitz in 1699. Many of their reasons of success have deteriorated over the years and actually caused the decline as well. The Ottoman’s military was very strong, especially the members of the Janissaries corps. Boys were recruited from the local Christian population to serve as guards but only the best ones became Janissaries. Soon, though, the position became hereditary, so there was no longer a need to be excellent to occupy a position. Also, the training of officials declined, and the elite formed a privileged group seeking wealth and power. Although the Ottoman system was religiously tolerant, non-Muslims were forced to pay a head tax because of their exemption from military service and were divided by religious faith into a number of “nations” that had its own leader and laws. Also, before the decline, the position of the sultan was hereditary and a son always succeeded his father. The heir to the throne gained experience by being assigned as governors of provinces. Later, the oldest surviving male inherited the throne and others were kept secluded which provided them with no governmental experience in case they succeeded the throne. The sultans became less involved in the government and allowed their ministers to exercise more power so he became the servant of the ruling class. The sultan controlled his bureaucracy through an imperial council conducted by the grand vezir. Later, the central bureaucracy lost its links with rural areas, local officials grew corrupt, and taxes rose. The decline of the empire was evident.
The Term Paper on Collapse Of An Empire Travel Journal
1. What was Justinian I’s role in the decline of the Byzantine Empire? First, his constant wars and the rebuilding of Constantinople after the Nika Riot caused serious financial problems for the empire. The reconstruction of the Hagia Sophia alone cost about 320,000 pounds of gold. Second, Justinian left the Byzantine army scattered across the empire. Many units were occupied fighting fierce ...
The Safavid Empire began in Azerbaijan. The empire continued to expand during Shah Abbas’s reign but after his death, the dynasty gradually lost its vigor. At first, Shah Ismail, the founder of the Safavid dynasty, tried to convert members of the Ottoman Empire into Shiites. This resulted in massacre of the Sunni Muslims in 1508. Alarmed, the Ottomans fought back and won a major battle. However, after a few years, Ismail regained the land. Many years later, the Ottomans attacked back and forced the new shah, Abbas, to sign a treaty. It was Abbas who led the Safavids to their highest point. The political and social structure was strong. Senior positions in the bureaucracy were by merit rather than by birth. Religious tolerance was practiced. Abbas hired foreigners from neighboring countries for positions in his government to avoid religious competition. The shahs also took a direct interest in the economy, playing an active part in trade and manufacturing. The artistic excellence was evident, ranging from the textiles to painting, but literature was lacking. Many Safavid poets wrote for Mughal emperors because of the greater financial rewards. Shah Abbas’s death in 1629, his successors lacked his talent and political skills. The power of the religious elements increased at court and society as well. Intellectual freedom curtailed under the pressure of religious orthodoxy. Women were forced into seclusion and were required to wear a veil.
The Mughals, one of India’s greatest empires, united all of India under one government with a common culture. Akbar, the greatest of the Mughal monarchs, like the other two empires, accepted the policy of religious tolerance. He allowed Hindus to serve at court and welcomed Christian views. Trade, manufacturing, and art flourished but the development of literature was held back because of the absence of printing. When Akbar died, his son, Jahangir, ruled. He was able and ambitious, strengthening central control over his empire in his early years. It was during his reign, however, that weakened the empire. One of his wives, Jahan, took advantage of her position to enrich her own family and arranged the marriage of her niece to her husband’s third son and successor, Shah Jahan. When Jahan succeeded the throne, he ordered the death of all his rivals to secure his own position. During his reign, he maintained the system established by earlier Mughal rulers and also expanded the boundaries of the empire but had inherited a nearly empty treasury because of Empress Nur Jahan’s spending. The majority of Jahan’s subjects lived in poverty while military campaigns and building projects compelled him to raise taxes. Later, during Aurangzeb’s reign, he attempted to eliminate India’s social evils. He forbade the custom of suttee, levying of taxes, gambling, and drinking. Since he was a devout Muslim, non-Muslims were driven from court. Because of Aurangzeb’s policies, Mughal power was threatened from both within and without. India was increasingly divided, which made it more vulnerable to attacks.
The Essay on Shah Jahan
Shah Jahan Shah Jahan, also known as Shahbuddin Mohammed Shah Jahan, was a Mughal Emperor who ruled in the Indian Subcontinent from 1628 to 1658. He was the fifth Mughal ruler, after Babur, Humayun, Akbar and Jahangir. Shah Jahan succeeded the throne after revolting against his father, Jahangir. The period of Shah Jahan's rule in India is regarded as the golden age of Indian architecture. He is ...
Delhi was sacked by the Persians in 1739 and the many actions of the British also hastened the decline, especially that of the economy. The British take over took money from the hands of local Indian landowners and gave it to the East India Company officials, hastened the destruction of healthy local industries, and confiscated the land of many peasants, killing one-third of the population in areas under British control.
Although all three of the empires had reached their highest point and were considered to be three great Muslim empires, all of them had started the process of decline. Aurangzeb’s actions can illustrate some of the reasons for decline. Without religious tolerance, the empire started having a number of revolts against the imperial authority. By forbidding customs of other religions and everything he considered evil, rebellious groups reasserted local authority, reducing the emperor’s power. After causing the weakness of his empire, Delhi was reduced to ashes by the Persians. During and after his rule, everything started to fall apart. This comes to show that one lousy ruler can be the reason for decline in any empire because in order for the empire to be successful, it must have a good ruler, wealth, a strong military, and religious tolerance.
The Term Paper on British Entrepreneurs And The Decline Of The British Economy
Was the British entrepreneur the most important single reason for the relative decline of the British economy in the late nineteenth century Despite a continued growth of production and wealth in absolute terms, the economy of "the first industrial nation" began to decelerate after 1870, in comparison with that of her closest competitors. This so called "decline" was caused by a number of factors ...
