During the Classical Age of Greece, two powerful city-states emerged, each governed by a different system. Athens was run by democracy, whereas, Sparta, a military state, was governed by oligarchy. Athens’ democracy served its people better. Since all had a say in the government and everyone was included in a state was ruled by many.
In Sparta, the state was controlled by a select few, kings and ephor’s, who had absolute power. In Athens plenty of time was spent on architecture, to ensure that Athens would forever leave behind a cultural legacy, whereas in Sparta it was believed that there was no need to build extravagant buildings, therefore leaving very little of a cultural legacy. Finally, Athenian slaves were treated very well, often paid, and had a chance to buy their freedom, unlike Sparta, where slaves were treated as though they were not people, and could be killed for any reason at all. In Sparta slaves lead cruel lives.
The number of slaves in Sparta outnumbered the amount of citizens, making Spartans constantly paranoid of a helot revolt. In order to prevent this fear, ‘the ephor’s declared war on them every year. In spite of these precautions, the Spartans frequently had to suppress helot revolts’ (Davis 90).
The Spartans felt this was an efficient way to keep the numbers of slaves down, and to further subdue the slaves hopes of one day being free.
Since slaves were treated horribly by the Spartans they were constantly trying to escape. In Sparta a slave could be killed simply because of being suspicion of that slave being a rebel or planning to escape. In Athens most slaves were loved, respected, and often paid for their labours. They were given the opportunity to pay for their freedom.
The Essay on Athen Vs Sparta City State
Athens and Sparta were both well-developed city-states, but each had their own ways of living. Athens seemed to be a little more organized than Sparta. However, Sparta was mostly based on a strong military. Athens is clearly a better city-state to live in, in comparison to Sparta, because of its politics, economics, and culture. Unlike Sparta, Athens was a democracy, which means it was ruled by ...
Unlike Sparta, slaves in Athens were ‘protected from harm by legislation’ (Davis 94).
Slaves were much more happy in Athens since they were not constantly in fear for their lives. In Athens slaves also had several opportunities for normal jobs, for example, a slave could be an artist an. Slaves in Athens, ‘often worked alongside citizens and metics in both unskilled and highly skilled jobs’ (Davis 95).
On the most part, slaves in Athens were happy and content, however one-fifth of the slave population was forced to live and work in the silver mines. Since slaves in Athens received better treatment and the ability for them to have jobs other than normal labours, slaves had a better life than the slaves of Sparta.
Another dividing point between these two city-states was their architecture. In Sparta it was believed that life should be kept simple. This belief that ‘to successfully control their empire and defend it against their enemies, they must sacrifice their comfort and culture for a more rigid and disciplined army camp’ (Davis 89).
As a result Spartans left behind very little architecture and even less of a cultural legacy. Most of what can be found of Sparta now are rocks in fields. In Athens there was a great love of architecture.
An example of this is the Parthenon, ‘an achievement of unmatched harmony and classical beauty’ (Davis 86).
The Parthenon is one of the most recognized building in Greece. This temple was dedicated to Athena and often used in religious celebrations such as the Panathenaea. Athens strove for a cultural legacy and admired the beauty with in their city. Pericles, a great leader, was aware of this when he said, ‘Mighty indeed are the marks and monuments of our empire which we have left.
Comparative Essay On Athens And Sparta Society
Compare and contrast society in Athens and Sparta. Which was the stronger society? One of the greatest city states of all time was the city state of Athens from which we take many of our modern ways. Their government was a full democracy in which they had an assembly made of all male citizens over 25 years old, a council of five hundred who proposed laws to the assembly, a court, where there were ...
Future ages will wonder at us, as the present age wonders at us now’ (Davis 93).
Pericles knew that the wonderful architecture of Athens would always be admired and wondered at, leaving behind a cultural legacy that would be remembered as a strong city-state and for their culture far longer than Sparta’s. This contrast in ideals can be best seen in the different systems of government of Athens and Sparta. In Sparta the system of government was an oligarchy. In this form of government power belonged to the selected few. The most powerful men in Sparta were the ephor’s.
They were, ‘elected annually, they had command over all. The ephor’s controlled education and both public and private moral conduct. They enforced laws through a secret police force’ (Davis 90).
Since the ephor’s had the real influence, the citizens of Sparta had very little power. They had to obey mindlessly what they were told to do by the ephor’s. Their ideal was complete devotion to the state.
In Athens the system of government was a democracy. In this form of government power belonged to the many. In Athenian democracy it was believed that, power is in the hands not of a minority, but of the whole people. When it is a question of settling private disputes, everyone is equal before the law; when it is a question of putting one person before another in positions of public responsibility, what counts is not membership of a particular class, but the actual ability which the man possesses (Davis 92).
In democracy, almost everyone was given a chance to rise to power, it didn’t matter what class one belonged to and what was most important was one’s willingness to fulfill the positions to the best of their ability.
Also, politics in Athens was almost like a religion, they believed ‘that a man who takes no interest in politics is a man who minds his own business; we say that he has no business here at all’ (Davis 92).
They had a strong belief that everyone should participate in politics since it often effected everyone in the city-state. Because of Athens democracy, most everyone (male citizens) had a chance to rise to power. Everyone got a say in what was to happen, or what law was to be passed. Since there was involvement by the Athenian citizens in their government and politics, democracy better served the Greek people than the Spartan oligarchy.
The Essay on Athens Sparta Differences Government
Sparta & Athens Sparta and Athens so close yet so different. Since the being of these two great city~states everyone has been fascinated by the similarities, but more by the differences. This essay will tell more about the differences than the similarities. I'll start with the similarities. Sparta and Athens are alike in few ways one was is in there class of social groups. Sparta has citizens ...
Sparta believed that oligarchy served its military state better, that rule by the few was more productive than rule by the many. Athens was governed by a democracy, a system which included all classes regardless of wealth and was ruled by the several. In Athens’ government, all had a say, and all classes were included, while in Sparta, the state was ruled by a select few who had the absolute power. In Athens people strove to leave a cultural legacy, using architecture, whereas in Sparta it was believed that there was no real need to build or make anything extravagant, they did not strive for a cultural legacy. Finally, in Athens most slaves were treated very well, and thought to be quite happy and content with their lives, unlike Sparta, where slaves were treated like animals, and constantly revolted in hopes of achieving their freedom.
Democracy left open many opportunities for people living under its rule, serving its people far better than the oligarchy of Sparta. Davis, M. Dale. Civilizations in History. Canada: Oxford University Press, 1986.
