Everyday we are bombarded with various forms of stimuli. We see many people, we hear cars drive by, we feel the cool breeze, etc, but how can we prove that we are really experiencing these stimuli? That is the question that Rene Descartes asked some three hundred fifty years ago, is there anything real in this world? Descartes concluded that at least his mind existed because he was thinking, which led to him saying Cogito ergo sum which means I think therefore I am. In this essay I will briefly discuss Descartes theory, and discuss alternative opinions to his theory. Around 1641 Descartes convinced himself that nothing really existed no sky, no earth, no minds, no bodies, (Hospers 71) so would this make him nonexistent? No it wouldnt because he doubts and how can there be doubt if there isnt anybody to do the doubting. Now that he proved that the mind existed then he could doubt everything else, such as what we saw, heard, tasted, felt, and smelled. Descartes supposed that there was a demon that was spending all of its time deceiving him and everyone else. The demon would plant illusions in his and everybodys head to make us believe that we are seeing, touching, tasting, hearing, and smelling, it may even be deceiving us into thinking that we have a body.
But he cant deceive me into believing that I exist when I dont for there must be a me to be deceived. But perhaps he deceives me about everything else. (Hospers 72) One of the most frustrating things about Descartes theory is that there is no true way to find out if one is being deceived. In the movie The Matrix everyone was walking around in a world that was completely manufactured by super intelligent robots. The only thing that was real was everyones mind That movie agrees with Descartes and says at least the mind exist. Descartes seemed to have a perverse faith to believe a demon is the root of all of the false perception.
The Essay on Mind Brain Identity Theory
Mental processes are physical is equivalent to what is coined The Identity Theory. Smart's theses is that mental events are identical to brain processes. The definition of neurophysiological is to say the science of neurons dealing with living matter such as the brain. Smart discounts Cartesian Dualism that depicts the mind as a separate entity than the physical body. In addition, Smart's theory ...
If only our mind existed then where is our mind? If we are living in a fake reality our minds could be sitting in a tank somewhere or something to that effect. If that were the case then we wouldnt have to look to a demon for our perception fallacies, our own mind could be the root of our false reality. If Descartes believed that a demon was the culprit then how fantastical could it be to think that we are creating this ourselves. If our world is fake then one could guess that our mind dwells in a place that is for lack of a better word boring, because there isnt anything to stimulate it like music, art, food, etc, so the mind would be forced to make it up. That may explain the difference in perception among people, or even how some may come in conflict with others. Another theory is that everyone is part if one big mind, we are all created by a huge mind, almost like a book, and we are the characters.
Descartes demon could also be part of this theory as the writer of this so-called book we call life. We have no mind we are just pawns moving as the writer sees fit, if we were to doubt it would be a result of us just following the script, so a mind would not be necessary, in such circumstances. This adds to the frustration because it is impossible to truly prove any of these theories, there are little things that are seem proven, but are only on a philosophical basis. There is the off chance that we are all being paranoid and everything is real, there is no problem with everything being real. We can really be smelling the flowers, tasting the foods, seeing a play, touching that table, and hearing that song. Why is that so far fetched why cant they exist, Descartes would say that I was being deceived still yet again.
If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck, then why does it have to be a deception, it was a lot easier being a duck. I feel that Descartes was complicating matters by questioning the existence of everything, because if only ones mind exists then one is inclined to wonder where does this mind exist if we are living in this false reality. Descartes felt that we were being deceived, but how can we be deceived if we cant prove that we are being deceived, if you told me that you won the lottery of 25million then I would be able to find out that I was being deceived, but if there is no way that we can find out that we living in a land of deception. Then in essence the deception would become real, for example if I could never find out that you were deceiving me in regards to you winning the lottery then as far as Im concerned it might as well be true. Descartes would argue that the deceptions of the demon are perfect because he is deceiving through all of the senses and his deceptions cant be detected. So this makes it senseless to dispute the truth in the world because you cant unplug yourself from the world to see if there is a demon deceiving everybody. Not questioning what is taken as common knowledge has been the bane of man for countless centuries, because with every question new light is shed on reality and new understanding is created.
The Term Paper on Perception Of Reality
Each of the three authors, Lewis Carroll, Samuel Beckett, and C.S. Lewis are able to create their own perception of reality through the manipulation of characters and use of literary devices. However, reality is an individual concept and thus each author has a distinct perception of it that becomes apparent in his writing: in Carroll’s Alice’s Adventure in Wonderland, Alice goes beyond ...
But Descartes questioned the unquestionable there is exactly no true way to tell what is real and what isnt, but he felt that he could. I feel that he did the equivalent of taking the cowards way out by presenting a topic that cant be proven or disproved so no matter what stance he takes he cant be called wrong just disputed.
Bibliography:
Works cited Hospers, John An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis Routledge London (1997) Http:// www.artifolio.com/pete/reality/RMTML/R14.html Http://www.orst.edu.instruct/phil302/philosophers/ descartes.html http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaverla/Launchpad/1 350/essays/cogito.html Daily, C Descartes Cogito Ergo Sum Houghton Mifflin Chicago (1996).
