Nelson Pike wrote the article Divine Omniscience and Voluntary Action as an elaboration of Boethius’ Divine Foreknowledge and Freedom of the Will. Pike thought that Boethius had a valid, logical argument that was just not thought out fully. Boethius stated that perhaps there is a lack of free will if God already knows what is and will happen. However, in order for this argument to be valid, some assumptions need to be made. The first assumption is that God exists. Second is the view of God as omniscient.
God knows everything that has ever occurred, is occurring, or will occur. God is never wrong. Finally, is the view of God as perpetual, not eternal. This means that at any point in time, God exists. God has a temporal relationship with the universe, as opposed to having a timeless relationship. Pike uses these assumptions as the basis for his arguement.
To begin with, what God believes is the same as what God knows, whereas believing and knowing are two completely different things when in reference to anyone else. One can believe something yet have that belief be factually wrong. The same cannot be said for God. Next, if someone believed something three days ago, it is not possible to do something now that would change the belief of that person three days ago. It follows that if said person was God his belief three days ago could not be changed now. The same can be said about existance.
If someone existed three days ago, it is not possible to do something now that would make it such that that person did not exist three days ago. In other words, if God existed three days ago, nothing can happen now that would make God not have existed three days ago. One cannot do something that logically contradicts itself. For example, one is not able to inhale yet exhale at the same time. It is not possible to do something, yet not do that thing at the Now, if God exists, and God believes (knows) something three days ago, and it were possible to do something that was different than what God thought three days ago, there would First, that would mean that God was wrong. Since the assumption is that God is omniscient, it is not possible for God to be wrong.
The Essay on Existence Of God People World Exist
"If God did not exist, would it be necessary to invent him?" This question deals with the necessity of God himself. It asks us to imagine that there is no knowledge about any superhuman being, such as God. It makes me think about weather or not we would be inclined to want something like God. I am forced to think of how important God is in my own life, and how important God is in the rest of the ...
Second, if God is never wrong, there is no way to take action now that would change God’s belief three days ago so that it coresponds to today’s action, thereby making God correct in Third, the belief held three days ago was wrong. That entails that the person who held that belief could not have been God. But it was stated that God held that belief, therefore it is not possible to make it such that God did not exist three days ago when, in fact, God did. These contradictions lead towards the conclusion that it is not possible to do anything that God did not know about three days ago. If God already knew/knows what will happen, and if God is never wrong, then there cannot be any choices to be made concerning anything that can be done. This absence of choice equals the absence of free will. It is not as if one can out manuver God either.
One may decide to change his or her mind at the last possible moment about something, yet God already knows of those changes, and the outcomes derived from them, because God knows everything. This arguement does not claim that there is no free will, nor does it claim that there is free will but no God. The only purpose is to make clear the problems arising form thinking that God is omniscient and also thinking that free will exists. It seems to be logically incorrect to
