Nationalism is based upon the idea that each individual will be loyal to their nation in which they construct. Nationalists support ‘organic communities’, whereby society is naturally divided, therefore each nation holds their own national identity. ‘Inevitably’ suggests that rivalry and conflict is certain. However, looking at the different branches of Nationalism, the inevitability of conflict varies. The Liberal Nationalists would not consider conflict as inevitable, which shows their naivety to the xenophobic ideas of Nationalism, as it promote a distinct ‘Them’ and ‘Us’ attitude, which Liberal Nationalists ignore. Their idea is to promote a Liberal Nation-State, whereby the State rules on behalf of the nation, and to promote individual freedom and protection of rights. They agree with ‘self-determination’ – first introduced by Woodrow Wilson, post WW1 – giving a ‘nation’ the right to become a State. Each independent Liberal Nation-State, will have the equal right to ‘self-determination’, therefore promoting an ordered peaceful world, suggesting conflict, with regards to Liberal Nationalist branch, is no inevitable, but unthinkable, as no nation would attempt to surpass others, leading to international peacefulness between each Liberal Nation-State.
The Term Paper on Nations And Nationalism Nation Modern State
... continuation of ethnic conflict and nationalism. However, the fracturing of former nation states, such as ... heroes elevated into national icons by nationalists. Smith describes this as the first ... elites' above the 'masses' of other nations, and promoted 'universal emancipation.' There have been various ... trade flows across frontiers'# from the liberals, and the identification of the proletariat ...
However, arguably, their naivety towards human nature within the Liberal Nation-States makes Liberal Nationalists unable to see potential conflict. The individual nations, albeit of the same branch of Nationalism, as Nationalism suggests, would have divided opinions with regard to various punishments, jurisdiction, rights and so on, therefore, leading to conflict, even though the Liberal Nationalists do not consider this ‘inevitable’. Conservative Nationalists believe nations emerge naturally. Their Nation-State objective is to promote order, stability and cohesion, not a social contract of Liberal Nationalists promoting peace and tolerance. They defend traditional institutions (i.e. the Monarchy and Parliament), thus promoting Patriotism, whereby loyalty to ones country will inevitably encourage loyalty to ones nation. They take action when our political institutions are under threat from change.
National identity and maintaining order and stability is of key interest, therefore, justifying their hatred towards Immigration, as it encourages the disruption of social order and blurs national identity; and ‘Supranationalism’ (EU), as it undermines the authoritative position of our political institutions. This therefore could lead to inevitable conflict, as Conservative Nationalism fears foreigners, linking it to racism and inevitable cultural and moral rivalry. They are intolerant, in comparison to Liberal Nationalists, and focus, not on peace, but the promotion of social order within the nation. Similarly, Expansionist Nationalists ‘inevitably breed rivalry and conflict’, purely because they are extremely militaristic and aggressive; rejecting the idea of self-determination or all states having equal rights to self-determination, which is what the Liberal Nationalists support. Their idea is based upon inequality between nations, that some are automatically superior in comparison to others.
They can be described as ‘Chauvinistic’ due to their belief of dominance of certain nations over others, examples being in Russia, with the superiority of the slavs. They enjoy conflict and War as they thrive off their military achievements, which by extension to them, demonstrates a nations achievements. Expansionist Nationalists are viewed as ‘militaristic’, as they strongly follow the ‘for or against’ attitude; you either support or reject their ideas, therefore, inevitably breeding conflict between opposing beliefs. ‘Inevitable’ is an awkward word to describe conflict, simply because, it suggests that conflict is expected, however, looking further into the different branches of an ideologies beliefs’ it is clear that they have varied opinions about the on set of conflict.
The Essay on Abuse Of Women Violence Nations Conflict
Violence Against women by the Republic of India Background of Violence against women: Violence against women has been going on ever since the start of civilization. Women have always been lower than man in every nation, country and city in the world and in every aspect of life. It is still okay for people living in other nations for them to beat women, and it still happens in nations that restrict ...
Liberal Nationalists would not predict conflict, yet alone it being considered ‘inevitable’, as they support peace and international cooperation between nations. However, Conservative and Expansionist Nationalists would argue otherwise. They enjoy conflict and basking in their previous military successes. They support order amongst society and see inequality between nations as normal, therefore inevitably breeding rivalry between the opposing and weaker nations, trying to prove themselves otherwise.
