Emile Durkheim main concern was social order, and how individual integrated to maintain it. The Division of Labor was one of Durkheim’s first major works. Society is a system of inter-related and inter-connected of not only individuals but also subgroups interacting with one another. Durkheim is interested on how this division of labor changes the way that individuals feel when they are part of society as a whole. As society advances it becomes more complex, and as it becomes more complex, it gets harder to maintain with the rise of conflict. According to Durkheim, this is why society has its division of labor, and in order to survive, society is broken down to certain specializations where people are more dependent on each other.
Durkheim believed that the division of labor begins when the social, economic and political boundaries dividing segments begin to break down and smaller segments come together. Within these segments, Durkheim describes another degree of integration which is broken down into two aspects; Mechanical Solidarity and Organic Solidarity. Within in these social solidarities, he identifies a system of social relations linking individuals to each other and to the society as a whole. Societies where solidarity is mechanical, are referred to a bonding of individuals based on common beliefs and values, which more tied by a kinship aspect.
“Mechanical Solidarity is based upon a strong collective conscience regulating the thought and actions of individuals located with structural units that are all alike” (Turner).
The Research paper on Sociology Durkheim Organic Solidarity
... this, a change is solidarity can change the causes behind why individuals in a society commit crimes. Durkheim’s organic solidarity ideas of division of labour and ... lead to disintegration, rather it leads to social solidarity based on interdependence. Most societies today demonstrate organic solidarity and as a result, the new ...
Individuals are bind together where they share a similar customs and morality. As a result of this type of social link, it is difficult to distinguish the individual’s values versus society’s value. Because people live in a community where each individual must work together to provide a well-being for another, they become far too dependent on each other.
This type of livelihood suppresses the individual conscience and in fact encourages the collective conscience. By having such a homogenous population, a system of belief is uniformly shared throughout, constructing a standardized attitude and actions amongst the people often rooted in religious laws. Social bonds are of responsibility rather than contract, therefore the division of labor is divided into tasks for collective reasons Contrary to Mechanical Solidarity, is Organic Solidarity. “Organic Societies reveal high degrees of interdependence among individuals and corporate units, with exchange, legal contracts, and norms regulating these interrelations.” (Turner).
Individuals become more dependent on others to perform separate economic functions which they are unable to carry out themselves. Rather than responsibilities based on the collective values, individual’s performance in the society is based on an occupational aspect.
The division of labor is more establish through a mutual economic interdependence. Hence, the relationship between man and society is framed by a contract. The people carry out specialized functions which regulates the performance in the society as a whole. This type of secular society, has a larger population than the type of a mechanical one, the collective conscience is significantly lower due to the fact the each individual have more of a freedom, which may then lead to an anomie; a social instability due to the deteriorating standards of norms and values. Anomie refers to the breakdown of social norms where these norms no longer control the activities of the members of society. Because Organic societies are much larger, it becomes more complex, there interactions amongst the people are no longer tied with social bonds and is impersonal.
The Essay on The Effects That Society Has On Individuals Are Negative
Society is, by definition, a group of people who live in the same area who tend to follow the same standards. Society influences people to follow their expectations, because it is thought of as the right way to live. Due to this influence, society has a negative impact on the individuals who are a part of it. Society forces conformity on others, has individuals acting selfish, and lowers self- ...
A way of solving this problem is strengthening associations with in the society, creating a stronger normative structure, hence regaining a collective conscience. As mentioned early, a mechanical society has a stronger collective conscience. Collective conscience is a system of symbols, particularly the norms; values and beliefs that humans create and use to organize their activities. Durkheim distinguishes four characteristics of collective conscience: volume, intensity, determinateness and content.
First, volume refers to the degree of emphasis of values and norms are set through the society. Second is the intensity, where the greater of the collective conscience, the stronger exertion of social beliefs and norms. Third is the determinateness, which refers to the resistance offered by collective beliefs and how willingly the give a way to change. And last is content, in regards to the dominant characteristic of the society, either religious content, or secular content which slowly transforms from religion to a more political or economical function. It is the strength of this collective conscience, which determines the level of social control in a society. How does collective conscience provide social control? Durkheim states that collective conscience is derived from religion.
Durkheim himself does not totally agree with the concept of religion, referring to that there is a god or a supernatural being. He, however, grants that religion, as an institution, provides a great level of social control through the conduct of morality. “Durkheim defined sociology as the science of ‘moral facts'” (Turner, 364).
Through morality, a society has its rules and structure where individual has a duty to abide by. According to Durkheim, morality consists of three elements: rules, attachments to groups, and voluntary constraint. Morality is essentially a system of rules for guiding the actions of people.
The Essay on Forms Of Social Control
Critical Thinking Assignment #1 The question posed for critical thinking #1 is aside from the threat of legal punishment, what controls people’s behavior? In our text book Criminology The Core, 4th Ed. by Larry Siegel, Beccaria argued that the threat of punishment controls crime. There have been many forms of social control ever since there has been a society. Small groups of people needed minimal ...
In addition to these guidelines, moral rules attach people into groups. Man does not associate with society as a whole; he on the other hand, has a closer relationship with several smaller groups: for example families, churches, and further more political associations. Morality provides self-control and a commitment to collectiveness. With the presence of moral rules, anomie, safe to say can be eliminated, and social control is strengthened. Another way that morality contributes to social control is voluntary constraint. The people are more disciplined.
However, this is does not always apply to any society. In a simpler or mechanical society, where collective conscience is high, “morality seems to operate automatically.” The natural growth of complexity seems to the deteriorate morality, where it must be implemented in order to maintain social control. Through moral education and strengthening values within associations, and as society advance, social control will be preserved.
