Considered perhaps the most important concerns in any presidential candidates political platform is that which addresses economic policy; and, this is certainly the case with regard to the current stance between George W. Bush and Al Gores candidacies. With Bush successfully appeasing his loyal followers and Gore effectively accommodating his, as well, the two presidential candidates believe that their own individual perceptions of economic policy are both exact and correct for continuing forward with the countrys prosperous future. We all know that Bushs line of attack has long been the attack on the tax situation, being so passionately committed to significantly lowering such monetary obligations as a means by which to spur economic growth This singular factor has been the primary target of most, if not all, presidential candidates since political policy was established. With each passing candidate comes the increased need to turn these promises into action. That has proven to be the principal complaint with Bushs stance on economic policy, being that his assertion of the need for lowered taxes is the same song and dance that has been heard for decades. Bush said of his tax policy, Im going to defend it and Im going to campaign on it.
The Essay on Fiscal Policy Government Economic Council
Fiscal Policy can be explained in many ways, for example. Fiscal policy is the use of the government budget to affect an economy. When the government decides on the taxes that it collects, the transfer payments it gives out, or the goods and services that it purchases, it is engaging in fiscal policy. The primary economic impact of any change in the government budget is felt by particular groups-a ...
Its a winning issue for me. Gores position with regards to economic policies has deviated very little from the policies he and Clinton have put into place over the past two terms, with the Vice President claiming to have been very much involved in shaping our current economic policies, certain he can effectively maintain such prosperity. Gore is convinced that what has worked throughout the past decade will also continue to set a precedent for the following presidential administration, given the fact that he has had such a significant influence upon these economic policies. Candidate Gore will continue with that which he believes has proven to serve the American people in the past. Beyond the issue of taxes, Bushs stance on economic policies has not been seen much, according to critics who contend that the presidential candidate is purposely side-stepping the question. While full of fury and intent, his speeches have been less than adequate when it comes to plainly stating his economic intentions if elected president. Perhaps energy could be better directed to pressuring Mr.
Bush into giving the public a few more clues about the ideas and policies he intends to offer. When Gore is pressed on his economic policies, he quickly points to what has taken place during the current administration, providing a list of accomplishments that he believes sufficiently backs up his political stance. From exchanging the largest budget deficit to the largest budget surplus, as well as lowering inflation and unemployment, Gore sees no reason to modify the economic policies he sees as having a significant positive impact upon the country. We do have the capacity to make our democracy work for our future and to solve our problems. We are steadily gaining in our ability to reclaim control of Americas destiny and this has all happened in the past six years. Bush has continued to put forth a positive campaign thus far, part of which means that he refrain from criticizing other candidates stance on economic policies.
The Term Paper on Eight Years Wasted, the Economic Failures of the Bush Administration
Eight years wasted. That is the description that befits the George W. Bush administration of the United States between 2001 and 2008. Nevertheless, this is not a case of unfair criticism of the Bush administration, as noted by Republican Senator John McCain who served in Bush’s era (Curl). According to McCain as he campaigned for the presidency in 2008, Bush spent a lot of the United States’ ...
However, he is opposed to the manner by which Gore addresses the tax situation, he could not help himself when he commented that Gore consistently maintains a Washington mind-set when it comes to campaign proposals. According to Bushs political direction, taxes have come to represent the nucleus of his entire campaign, rendering him victim of many raised eyes and doubtful glances. Indeed the concept sounds wonderfully attractive, yet it is the ultimate display of action, or lack thereof, that has many people skeptical of Bushs ability to follow through with his intentions. The difference that exists between George W. Bush and Al Gores economic policies stem from the fact that both men are approaching the presidential candidacy from quite opposite positions. Indeed, it is a typical stance of politicians to utilize the proposed lowering of taxes as the primary focus of economic policy; however, according to his critics, it appears this issue is all that Bush is able to adequately focus upon.
Its conservative to cut taxes. Its compassionate to give people more of their money back. Gore, on the other hand, has experience and achievement in his corner as a means by which to stand behind his position on economic policy. With the attitude of why fix it if its not broken, which I agree with a hundred percent, and also the fact that the policies have been tremendously successful, I tend to lean more towards Gores views and ideas than Bushs on the economic policy. Now we need to continue our prosperity and use the prosperity to move our country forward and upward, and to make our country not only better
