However, these efforts to change the environmental situation have been cosmetic at best. This shortcoming is a result of some who remain adamant and apathetic to take up the responsibility of protecting the environment. As long as people recognise their roles and are responsible in protecting the environment, those efforts would remain concerted and maintained in the long run. Arguments| Alternative views| There are governments who recognise the impact of traditional sources of energy and are turning to cleaner and greener alternatives such as nuclear energy.
In 2008, Italy announced that within five years it planned to resume building nuclear energy plants out of a growing concern over the warming effects of carbon emissions from fossil fuels. | Despite adopting an alternative source of energy, i. e. nuclear energy, some governments are undermining other solutions to climate change by diverting urgently needed resources away from the true renewable and energy-efficient solutions that governments who are serious about climate change need to invest in. | Big businesses are also more receptive to the call to look after the environment.
Increasingly, there are companies who exercise corporate social responsibility (CSR) as they are reinvesting in their workforce, communities and the environment. One such company is Starbucks who is committed to supporting programmes that facilitate farmers’ access to carbon markets, allowing them to generate additional income while helping to prevent deforestation. | Some companies stray away from their responsibilities to the environment as they falsely believe that developing sustainably would reduce their profits. Established outside of political parties, (nongovernmental organisations) NGOs voluntarily are responsible for advocating public’s concerns and pressurising governments to do a better job. Conservation International has worked with the Cambodian government to create a one-million acre protected area and sponsored scientific research of coral reefs off Indonesia. | As dedicated as NGOs are in protecting the environment, a small minority are more radical in their approach.
The Essay on The Environment Should Be Protected Because and Only Because Human Livelihoods Depend Upon It
The environment should be protected because and only because human livelihoods depend upon it. The essay will treat the different problems that exist, nowadays, between environment and human beings, their difficulty to coexist, and mostly the ethical issues that result from it. Introduction “There is a sufficiency in the world for man’s need but nor for man’s greed”- Mohandas K. Gandhi. This ...
Adherents of radical environmentalism and ecological anarchism are involved in direct action campaigns to protect the environment. Some campaigns have employed controversial tactics including sabotage, blockades and arson. | 2. Concept/Issue: Responding to Global Warming Question: Do the rich and privileged hold a greater responsibility to tackle environmental problems? Answer: According to Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, protecting the environment would be a concern of the rich and privileged because of their emphasis on the quality of life.
Given this concern and their ability to afford the skills, technology and costs of protecting the environment, the rich and privileged are often placed with greater responsibility to protect the environment. Apart from the aforementioned reasons, their influential position in the world renders them even more responsible. Therefore, with their economic advantage and political clout, the rich and privileged do hold a greater responsibility to tackle the environmental problems. Arguments| Alternative views| It is the affluent and developed nations that are often to blame for the problems plaguing the environment.
It is the way the rich lives, and in particular the excesses of the very rich, that is doing most of the real damage. The Worldwatch Institute in its annual report, State of the World 2004, addressed the devastating toll on the Earth’s water supplies, natural resources, and ecosystems exacted by a plethora of disposable cameras, plastic garbage bags, and other cheaply made goods with built in product-obsolescence, and cheaply made manufactured goods that lead to a “throw away” mentality. | Other developing nations are fast becoming the major contributors to environmental problems.
The Term Paper on Nuclear Energy
You are watching the control panels and gages for rector two. Sitting comely you think about how easy your job is. It is a joke! All day you sit around and watch the gages for reactor number two just to make sure they maintain their settings. You don’t even need to look at the gages either because a computer automatically regulates them without you. Life is so good. Suddenly all the sirens go of ...
Increasingly, developing countries are catching up rapidly to the detriment of the environment, health, and happiness. For years, the streets of China’s major cities were characterized by a virtual sea of people on bicycles, and 25 years ago there were barely any private cars in China. By 2000, 5 million cars moved people and goods; the number is expected to reach 24 million by the end of next year. | Rich nations have the financial resources and the political clout in their own countries and in the international arena. | Poor countries also have an important responsibility towards the world.
Many environmental problems respect no national borders; environmental problems in one country can easily cross physical borders and affect not only the country of origin. | 3. Concept/Issue: Environment and Economy Question: Will economic development always be carried out at the expense of the environment? Answer: Since the 1980s, there has been a growing body of evidence to suggest that industrialisation is having an effect on the climate of the planet. Till today, industrialisation with its countless new machines and technologies continue to exacerbate the exploitation of the environment.
If this were to go on, economic development would always eclipse protection of the environment. However the picture is not as bleak as it seems. Increasingly today there is a growing awareness and effort on the part of governments to develop sustainably. As long as governments are moving away from traditional methods of development and are developing sustainably, economic development would not always be carried out at the expense of the environment. Arguments| Alternative views| Developed countries are unwilling to slow down economic growth for the environment.
The Term Paper on Nuclear Power Energy Electricity Percent
... countries and contribute to the overall welfare of those utilizing the nuclear energy sources. Benefits include: conservation of fossil fuels, lowered economic energy ... Using fossil fuels as energy sources has had deleterious effects on our environment and has caused global ... Also, radiation exposure due to waste produced from nuclear energy has reduced tremendously. Nuclear reactors work somewhat like ...
Despite the incidence of nuclear accidents, this gradual dependance on nuclear energy is dues to it being a more environmentally friendly alternative to the traditional sources such as coal and fossil fuel. However, given the risks involved with nuclear energy, it does not make for the best way to meet the increasing energy needs of Mankind. Apart from nuclear energy, there are other equally or more environmentally friendly alternatives that are able to meet this increasing energy needs. Arguments| Alternative views| Compared to fossil fuels, nuclear energy is clean.
Unlike coal, natural gas, and petroleum, it does not release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere in the process of generating electricity. At a time when there is growing concern about the link between carbon dioxide and other greenhouses gases on the one hand and the warming of our planet on the other, this advantage of nuclear power has begun to loom larger. | Nuclear energy is economical only under a very restricted analysis – by the time you have factored in the costs of construction, insurance, waste disposal and decommissioning, you need huge subsidies. nuclear waste can be safely stored away. The best long-term solution for the disposal of the UK’s nuclear waste should be to bury it deep in the ground, The Committee on Radioactive Waste Management (CoRWM), an advisory group has said. The final disposal facility, or facilities, would be located several hundred metres underground. The waste would be encased in tough materials and would use the surrounding rock as a barrier to prevent radioactive leakage into the environment. | There is no secure, risk-free way to store nuclear waste.
